APPENDIX D:
Guidance on Technological Interventions
EHRs were primarily designed to manage individual patients rather than groups of patients. However, over time EHRs have increasingly added functionality for population-level quality reporting and management and some degree of care planning and care coordination, especially to support value-based care tracking and reporting. Practices should evaluate your EHR capabilities against specifically designed population management applications. While these applications require interface with the EHR, they generally offer additional functionality. While EHR solutions are integrated with EHR data, they still usually require import of data from outside sources to be optimally useful. Managed care organizations may provide care coordination and population management applications, but usually only for their own enrolled patients. EHR-based solutions may also pose challenges where groups of practices using different EHR solutions are collaborating in value-based care contracts.
In value-based care arrangements, practices are responsible for attributed patients who may have never been seen. Since these patients do not have records in the EHR, practices need to consider how they can manage these patients to engage them into care at the practice in the absence – at least initially – of the patients having records within the EHR. If your practice is using freestanding applications for this, they need the capacity to handle these attributed patients who have not been registered as patients.
FIGURE 25: CORE POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONALITY REQUIREMENTS
Figure 25 includes the technical functionalities required to support population management for pediatrics. These requirements can guide the evaluation of existing solutions or guide the development of requirements in evaluating potential new applications. The table also indicates the data sources required to enable the functionality.
# |
Functionality |
Population Health Management Requirement Description |
Data Acquisition Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Care guidelines |
Identify care gaps for all people with behavioral health conditions against care protocol. Care guidelines may be presentable to the clinical provider or support team at point of care through the EHR, in visit workflow as pre-visit prep or team huddle, through registries as above, and aspirationally as prompts to patients and caregivers. |
Commercial EHR-embedded guidelines provided by the vendor or customized by the practice. External source guidelines (clinical guidelines). Reference sites made available electronically. |
2 |
Registries |
Ability to produce registries (list or cohort of patients) organized to facilitate population management (e.g., children in age ranges relevant to measures and/or clinical standards, children sharing designated high risk criteria, such as medical, behavioral, social needs). Considerations for recognizing connection to the birthing person also include linking to registries of recently postpartum patients and pregnant patients in late third trimester or postpartum without delivery information, possibly due to delivery occurring at outside hospital system or birthing center. These registries should contemplate inclusion of functionality to trigger automated pre-defined action(s) and/or human-initiated action(s) for all or a defined subset of patients comprising the registry. A final consideration is the ability to manage children in the context of their families, requiring the ability to relate children to siblings for management purposes. Suggested HIT assets that can be leveraged to achieve this function include: EHR: Generate a list of patients who meet the criteria for inclusion in the population of focus. Track using an external database. Consider merging patients from an external data source, such as a payor, to have a complete roster. Population health management tool: |
EHR: Clinical data; scheduling data for appointments (e.g., how the WCVs are distinguished from other appointments or postpartum visits); pediatric-specific data (e.g., growth parameters, immunization data); immunization data; and screening data (see below). External data sources, such as: prenatal records, reference labs, specialty care, immunization registries, school health records, and social service providers’ data.. |
3 |
Clinical decision support (CDS) |
Care gaps should be displayed based on what is due with insight into previous results to support clinicians' ability to make decisions at the point of care for the provider and care team members supporting non-point of care management. Care guidelines may be presentable as clinical decision support to the clinical provider or support team at point of care, in visit workflow as pre-visit prep or team huddle, through registries as above, and as aspirational prompts to patients and caregivers. While her-based prompts are usually thought of as ideal, team-based care presents an opportunity for CDS to be presented to other members of the care team through other channels. The Five Rights Framework Clinical Decision Support: More Than Just ‘Alerts’ Tipsheet—September 2014 (cms.gov)is useful guidance to help health centers support decision-making across a wide range of the care delivery lifecycle, broader teams, and technology other than the EHR to look beyond office visits and providers. This is especially important to avoid alert fatigue and burnout. |
Internal EHR data. External source clinical data. Claims data (clinical lag should be noted). Electronic guideline specifications. Patient-contributed data. |
4 |
Care dashboards and reports |
Pediatrics dashboard: Population view by eligible study with sorting and filtering capability based on characteristics to be defined by the practice with the ability for the care team and case managers to document the actions completed; ability to see care gaps at a patient level and population level according to health center-prioritized care guidelines. Note that, to automate these reports, it is necessary to apply standardized data collection strategies against electronically specified protocols. |
Same as above (e.g., EHR data and external data sources, data from other sources of care). Claims data. |
5 |
Quality reports |
Same as above by quality measures, as opposed to care guidelines; ability to track HEDIS as well as customized measures and UDS. |
Quality measure specifications. Same as above (e.g., EHR data and external data sources, data from other sources of care). Claims data. |
6 |
Risk stratification |
The ability to categorize risk for patients and develop lists according to risk classification (e.g., tie to registry). Can be imported as externally generated risk score or calculated internally according to proprietary or customized risk algorithm. |
Data acquisition platform ingestion (already curated high-risk list ingested and utilized downstream in the journey). and/or Additional internal and external data sources to populate defined risk model. |
7 |
Inreach and engagement |
Allow for outreach to support pre-visit planning or post-visit care needs, such as assessments. Technology channels include population registry outputs; patient-facing applications, such patient portal; freestanding text messaging; and self-assessment or self-management applications. |
Same as above (e.g., clinical, EHR, etc.). Claims. |
8 |
Care management |
Allow for management of specific and unique care needs for high-risk patients. Care management requires the ability for multiple members of the care team to contribute to and rack elements of the plan. Challenges with freestanding care management applications include access to data from other sources of care, including the ability to track referrals, and workflow burden of staff utilizing multiple applications. Ability of the care management application to draw from and write back to the EHR is desirable but difficult to achieve. |
Care management protocols and appointment data (internal and external). Clinical data from external service providers. |
FIGURE 26: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR RECOMMENDED SCREENING FOR FOUNDATIONAL KEY ACTIVITIES
This table identifies strategies for using digital tools to complete appropriate screeners as recommended by clinical guidelines. Using technology to facilitate screening may streamline the workflow and preserve patient confidentiality where necessary.
ID |
Focus Area |
Completion of Digital Screeners |
Data Acquisition Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Depression screening |
In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.* |
Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores. |
2 |
Anxiety screening |
In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.* |
Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores. |
3 |
Unhealthy substance user screening |
In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.* |
Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores. |
4 |
Social needs screening |
In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.* |
Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores. |
*A workflow for identifying emergent behavioral health risks and a workflow for preserving patient confidentiality should be codified.
FIGURE 27: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR PATIENT OUTREACH AND PRE-VISIT PLANNING FOR FOUNDATIONAL KEY ACTIVITIES
This table outlines the use of technology to facilitate specific activities and potential technology solutions that can optimize the uptake and efficiency of in-office visits.
ID |
Technology Focus |
Patient Inreach and Pre-Visit Planning |
Data Acquisition Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Portal-based communication |
|
EHR interface and integration. |
2 |
AI-enabled chatbots |
Identifying issues that need to be addressed before an office visit that can be converted to telehealth visits. |
Population health and EHR incorporation of screening scores and responses. |
3 |
Text messaging |
Appointment reminders. |
EHR interface and integration. |
FIGURE 28: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCED PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND VIRTUAL CARE FOR GOING DEEPER ACTIVITIES
The table identifies technology solutions to engage patients asynchronously from office visits for a variety of use cases to enhance care and patient experience.
ID |
Focus Area |
Patient Engagement and Mobile Technology |
Data Acquisition Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
AI-enabled Chatbots |
|
HR interface and integration. |
2 |
Remote medical devices |
|
EHR and population health integration. |
FIGURE 29: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY FOR ON THE HORIZON ACTIVITIES
The table describes technology strategies that can enhance care delivery by using artificial intelligence and advanced technology tools.
ID |
Focus Area |
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Innovation |
Data Acquisition Dependency |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Predictive analytics |
|
EHR integration, population health, and patient engagement application integration. |
2 |
Artificial intelligence-enabled diagnostics |
Advanced diagnostic tools that can use imaging, audio files, and EHR data to suggest diagnoses and care management plans. |
EHR integration and population health integration |