POPULATIONS OF FOCUS

People with Behavioral Health Conditions Guide

Version 1 - April 2024

©️ 2024 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

This guide provides step-by-step guidance for improving population-based care for people with behavioral health conditions with the goal of supporting substantive cultural, technological, and process changes that enhance and deepen integrated behavioral healthcare, focusing on increasing depression screening and follow-up for adolescents and adults, and depression remission or response for adolescents and adults.

This guide was designed as part of the Population Health Management Initiative (PHMI), a California collaboration of the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Kaiser Permanente and Community Health Centers. Much of the content is relevant and adaptable to primary care practices of all kinds working to improve the health of the populations they serve.

Improving the health of individuals and populations is only possible with adequate behavioral healthcare. Research indicates behavioral health factors moderate all components of the quadruple aim: patient experience, health outcomes, healthcare costs, and the experience of those providing care. Conservative estimates demonstrate 40% of the Medicaid population has a mental health and/or substance use disorder.[1] California Health Home data indicate that approximately 40% to 50% of Medi-Cal patients have behavioral health needs. Mental health and addictive disorders are among the top 10 most frequent diagnostic conditions among Medi-Cal beneficiaries whose health challenges lead them to be in the top 5% of healthcare costs. Additionally, data demonstrate that psychosocial problems, a primary cause of frustration for primary care providers in safety net settings, drive 70% of all medical visits.

Primary care systems are the de facto mental health system in the United States, with more than 80% of psychotropics prescribed by primary care providers. Separating behavioral health from primary care has many challenges, including a 10% follow-through rate when patients are referred off-site for behavioral healthcare. Further, research in California indicates six in 10 patients would rather discuss behavioral health issues with a professional at their primary care facility than with one located off-site.[2]

These factors and other robust research on healthcare outcomes have driven the growth of integration of behavioral health services with primary care. Currently, all federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in California have some level of integrated behavioral health services. The largest barrier to robust integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH) services and improvements in population behavioral health for most health organizations is the wide gap between behavioral health (BH) needs and available resources. The BH provider shortage is severe[3][4] and most practices are understaffed to meet the practice’s population health needs. Additionally, the clinician workforce does not reflect the population serviced by most safety net organizations. The workforce is overwhelmingly white and monolingual English-speaking: psychologists are 88% white,[5] licensed marriage and family therapists are 79% white;[6] licensed clinical social workers somewhat more diverse at 58% white.[7]

Integrating behavioral health and primary care has been shown to increase access to services by providing BH services[8] in a lower stigma environment and addressing childcare and transportation barriers with a “one-stop shop” model. IBH research demonstrates significant improvements in patient experience,[9] health outcomes[10] and health equity.[11]

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), depression is a major contributor to mortality, morbidity, disability and economic costs in the United States. In 2021, 8.3% (21 million) of adults in the U.S. experienced at least one major depressive episode; 5.73% (14.5 million) experienced a major depressive episode with severe impairment.[12] Approximately 50% of those diagnosed with depression in the United States are also diagnosed with anxiety.[13]

Depression and other behavioral health conditions can often go undetected and unaddressed in primary care.[14] Black and Hispanic or Latino/a and, when they do, the services are of poorer quality compared to that of white patients.[15][16]

Developing, implementing and continually improving integrated care delivery within your practice is critically important; multidisciplinary, team-based care can increase equitable access to behavioral healthcare, improve patient health outcomes, enhance quality of life, and improve job satisfaction of medical providers and staff.

This guide is designed to help your practice enhance and deepen integrated behavioral healthcare and screen for and manage depression. It includes guidance on how to approach the activities of population health management in trauma-informed ways. In addition to the body of this guide, find more strategies in the resource on Trauma-Informed Population Health Management.

This guide provides practices with detailed guidance, examples, resources and tools to effectively screen for and manage depression and engage patients in integrated behavioral health services. The guide is designed to be helpful as part of an organized quality improvement strategy, with the goal of supporting substantive cultural, technological and process changes that improve population-based care and improve equitable outcomes.

The guide lists several key activities by section:

  • Foundational activities: The core activities that all practices must implement to enhance integrated care delivery and engage adult patients in depression screening and treatment to achieve depression remission.
  • Going deeper activities: More advanced activities that build off the foundational activities and help ensure your practice can achieve equitable improvement in depression screening and engage adolescents in depression screening and treatment.
  • On the horizon activities: Additional activities focused on improving care delivery with people with severely impacting mental illness.

Sequencing activities: We recommend practices consider planning and attempting to implement the activities in the sequence provided in this guide. At the same time, we recognize that different practices may follow a different path toward prioritizing and implementing these activities. Furthermore, there is overlap between activities; many activities build off of or form the building blocks of other activities.

Testing and implementing: For each activity, we provide guidance on how to plan, test and implement the activity, along with links to other resources, technology considerations and examples. Consider testing different versions of the action steps and roles on a small scale before wide scale spread throughout your practice.

Maintaining the progress: For many activities, we have also provided tips for periodically reviewing and making improvements to key workflows even after initially implementing the change. Ongoing review and continual improvement are important for your practice to maintain your progress in population health management and to help you stay nimble in adapting to changing patient demographics, new clinical best practices, new payment policies, workforce changes and other changes at your practice.

If you implement the key activities in this guide, you should be able to achieve the following foundational competencies.

For behavioral health, your practice will be able to consistently:

  1. Engage patients served by your practice to validate any of your proposed process improvements and to propose alternative methods to improve quality in your focus area.
  2. Analyze core quality measures to identify disparities and improvement opportunities for achieving universal depression screening among all attributed adolescents and adults.
  3. Integrate behavioral health follow-up services as needed (e.g., for positive depression screens).
  4. Identify and engage behavioral health partners.
  5. Create a health-related social needs screening process that informs patients’ treatment plans.
  6. Assess current capabilities and develop a plan for ongoing improvement in data utilization, care team workflows and efficiency that includes sustainable health information technology (HIT) strategies and continuous staff training in technology.

This guide also includes sections on measurement, equity, social health and behavioral health integration and an appendix that includes helpful tools and resources. We have included information about California Medi-Cal-covered benefits and services that were up to date at the time of publishing, but benefits and billing guidance change over time. Nothing in this guide should be considered formal guidance, and anyone using this guide should check with the appropriate authorities on benefits and billing guidance.

This is a living document and will change based on continued learning on this topic and may include additional activities, examples, resources and sections in the future.

Improving the health of a population impacts everyone in a practice. Critical roles needed to engage in the work outlined in this guide and support practice change, include:

  • Chief behavioral health officers (CBHOs), chief medical officers (CMOs) and other clinical leaders.
  • Operation leaders, such as chief operating officers (COOs) and practice managers.
  • Quality improvement leadership, like a director of quality improvement (QI), to support cultural changes.
  • Coaches or practice facilitators who are partnered with teams to help identify areas for improvement and support change through change management strategies.

Putting the Key Activities in Context

Person-centered population-based care

Each of the key activities advance one or more of the seven person-centered population-based care change concepts:

  1. Operationalize clinical guidelines.
  2. Implement condition-specific registries.
  3. Proactive patient outreach and engagement.
  4. Pre-visit planning and care gap reduction.
  5. Care coordination.
  6. Behavioral health integration.
  7. Address social needs.

FIGURE 1: PHMI IMPLEMENTATION MODEL

Implementationmodel Light

The measures covered in this guide consist of Healthcare Effective Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures designated as core and supplemental measures by PHMI. These measures can be considered outcome measures because there is ample evidence that improved timely screening rates and follow-up care improves overall population health outcomes for depression. All measures use standard HEDIS definitions and are aligned with California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Ca (CalAIM) and Alternative Payment Methodology (APM 2.0). For information about these measures, reference the PHMI Data Quality and Reporting Guide

PHMI selected a few core and supplemental measures of focus for this population, though practices can track others that feel important and relevant. This guide provides detailed guidance to improve your practice’s results on the following two core and supplemental measures for people with behavioral health conditions:

  1. Depression Screening and Follow-Up for Adolescents and Adults (core measure).
  2. Depression Remission or Response for Adolescents and Adults (supplemental measure).

Core HEDIS Measures for PHMI


PHMI Population of Focus

Measure

People with Behavioral Health Conditions

Depression Screening and Follow-Up for Adolescents and Adults

Percentage of people aged 12 and older who were screened for depression using a standard screening tool and, if positive, received follow-up care within 30 days.

Supplemental HEDIS Measures for PHMI


PHMI Population of Focus

Measure

People with Behavioral Health Conditions

Depression Remission or Response for Adolescents and Adults

Percentage of people 12 years and older with a diagnosis of depression, and an elevated PHQ-9 score who had evidence of response or remission within four to eight months of the elevated score.

The core and supplemental measures are part of a larger measurement strategy and learning system, as outlined in Appendix A: Sample Idealized System Diagram: Weaving Your Measurement Strategy and Learning System into Practice Operations. Key Activity 1: Convene an IBH Implementation Team outlines how your practice can develop a robust measurement system to support this work. In addition to quality assurance and monitoring, measures are also used during practice operations alongside other data for learning to:

  • Guide the actions of the IBH implementation team as they use a systematic approach to decreasing inequities and support implementing key activities across the practice.
  • Support the care team’s efforts to advance population health and reduce care gaps through daily, weekly and monthly workflows, as well as continuous identification of opportunities for improvement.

The PHMI Clinical Guidelines Advisory Group (CGAG) was established to create a standardized approach to review, adopt and promote established clinical guidelines in the PHMI cohort. For people with behavioral health conditions, guidance includes depression screening and follow-up. For more information, see the PHMI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Key Medi-Cal Populations of Focus.

FIGURE 2: CLINICAL GUIDELINES: DEPRESSION SCREENING AND FOLLOW-UP FOR ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS


Guideline source


PHMI measure

Depression Screening and Follow-Up for Adolescents and Adults

Guideline language

Complete a depression screening annually for persons 12 years of age and older. A specific screening questionnaire is not endorsed.

Although USPSTF does not specify frequency, the group endorsed the recommendation to screen annually.


Definitions

Depression screening: A patient screened for clinical depression using a standardized assessment instrument that has been normalized and validated for the appropriate patient population (e.g., adolescents aged under 17 years or adults aged 18 years and older).

Depression follow-up: A patient screened for depression with a positive result using a standard assessment instrument as above and who received follow-up care on or up to 30 days after the date of the first positive screen (31 total days). Any of the following on or up to 30 days after the first positive screen:

  • An outpatient, telephone, e-visit or virtual check-in follow-up visit with a diagnosis of depression or other behavioral health condition. 
  • A depression case management encounter that documents assessment for symptoms of depression or a diagnosis of depression or other behavioral health condition.
  • A behavioral health encounter, including assessment, therapy, collaborative care or medication management. 
  • A dispensed antidepressant medication.

OR

  • Documentation of additional depression screening on a full-length instrument indicating either no depression or no symptoms that require follow-up (e.g., a negative screen) on the same day as a positive screen on a brief screening instrument (e.g., brief screens include Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Beck Depression Inventory Fast-Screen (BDI-FS), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Short Form). For example, if there is a positive screen resulting from a PHQ-2 score, documentation of a negative finding from a PHQ-9 performed on the same day qualifies as evidence of follow-up.

Many key activities in this guide include considerations for utilizing the intervention to improve equitable health outcomes and reduce the effects of racism, bias and discrimination. Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities Within the Population of Focus describes key action steps for how to make an intentional and explicit effort to identify inequities, understand root causes and reduce those inequities.

This guide also offers resources for going deeper into organizational and ecosystem-level work to advance equitable outcomes through Key Activity 18: Strengthening Community Partnerships and Key Activity 19: Strengthening a Culture of Equity. For going deeper into organizational and ecosystem-level work to advance equitable outcomes, practices can look to the PHMI Equity Framework and Approach for additional guidance.

Evidence continues to accumulate that demonstrates the many ways in which social needs impact behavioral health outcomes, so it is important for practices to consider their role in supporting their patients’ social health. For many key activities in this guide, we have highlighted considerations related to social needs at the individual level or population level, such as expanding access to integrated behavioral healthcare that meets patients where they are. A foundational activity is Key Activity 7: Use Social Needs Screening to Inform Patient Treatment Plans, which can help practices better understand and support patient- and population-level needs. Practices can help patients make connections to resources in the community to address issues such as nutrition, childcare, legal and health education needs. For Medi-Cal patients and families with high levels of social need, such as those experiencing homelessness, referrals to Enhanced Care Management and community support programs are available.

For going deeper in this area, practices can utilize Key Activity 17: Continue to Develop Referral Relationships and Pathways for common social needs and Key Activity 18: Strengthen Community Partnerships to build upon the strengths, infrastructure and resources available in the community. More information about this dual patient- and population- level approach is available in the PHMI Social Health Framework and Approach.

Foundational Key Activities

Core activities that all practices must implement to enhance integrated care delivery and engage adult patients in depression screening and treatment.

KEY ACTIVITY #1:

Convene an IBH Implementation Team


 

This key activity involves all seven elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; implement condition-specific registries; proactive patient outreach and engagement; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction; care coordination; behavioral health integration; address social needs.

Overview

This activity provides guidance for developing, launching and sustaining an integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH) implementation team. This is the team within your practice that will be responsible for planning and implementing the foundational key activities in this guide and overseeing related quality improvement and equity efforts, as outlined in Appendix A: Sample Idealized System Diagram: Weaving Your Measurement Strategy and Learning System into Practice Operations. For the purposes of this guide, we will refer to it as the IBH implementation team, but your practice may decide on a different name for this team to acknowledge where you are in your integration journey, such as “integration group” or “IBH task force.”

Without a focused team, adequate senior leadership support, authority and decision-making capacity, documented goals and a timeline, IBH services often remain inadequate to improve population behavioral health. IBH services sufficient to improve population health require sustained attention and effort to integrate at the leadership, operational and clinical levels. IBH services need consistent refinement to meet the emerging behavioral health needs of patients; this requires deep commitment from an engaged, high-functioning and focused group, internal advocacy with other leaders, and creative collaboration.

This team is responsible for ensuring that all foundational key activities in this guide, including those related to screening for social needs, are implemented. When identifying potential members of this implementation team, the practice can identify a diverse group of staff who are reflective of the community served and who represent the lived experience of patients. In addition to implementing Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities Within the Population of Focus, the team should apply an equity lens to every step outlined in this guide to help ensure that any improvements are equitably spread among the patient population.

Relevant health information technology (HIT) capabilities to support this activity include care guidelines, registries, clinical decision support, care dashboards and reports (including social needs data), quality reports, outreach and engagement, and care management and care coordination. See Appendix D: Guidance on technological Interventions.

To enable team coordination, thought must be given to how access relevant technology and how data capture can be distributed, consistent, and integrated into workflows and how data is accessible across team members. Where possible, it is desirable to avoid duplication of data entry, siloing of information in standalone applications and databases, and the need to work in multiple applications requiring separate logins.

Action steps and roles

1. Demonstrate senior leadership ownership for and commitment to centering, implementing and refining IBH.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Chief medical officer, behavioral health leadership (e.g., BH lead, chief behavioral health officer, BH director, BH providers), clinic managers or COO.

In the context of BH integration, senior leaders are responsible for serving as high-level champions for IBH. A key role is to remove barriers of the IBH implementation team as they arise and help facilitate the change process in the organization. See Key Activity 2: Enhance the Culture of Integrated Behavioral Healthcare.

Championing IBH may include:

  • Clearing the path for improvement.
  • Creating and leveraging opportunities for IBH, including interpreting policy and billing landscapes.
  • Devoting resources to create a BH chief and IBH implementation team.
  • Protecting resources for IBH.
  • Supporting and championing the vision for IBH drafted by the IBH implementation team.

There may be further foundation building work needed at your practice in order for you to succeed at some of the key activities listed in this guide. The Population Health Management Capabilities Assessment Tool (PhmCAT) is a multidomain assessment that is used to understand current population health management capabilities of primary care practices. This self-administered tool can help your practice identify opportunities and priorities for improvement. If your practice has not scored high in the domains of leadership and culture, the business case for population health management, technology and data infrastructure, or empanelment and access, consider implementing the activities listed in the four guides on Building the Foundation in parallel to working on IBH.

2. Identify leadership and key members for the IBH implementation team.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Senior leadership.

The IBH implementation team should include those empowered to make changes in workflows, policies and staff assignments. They should be respected influencers in the organization (early adopters) who can also guide the change management process. They should also include those with expertise in working with patients around behavioral health concerns.

  • Appoint a champion or lead person (e.g., behavioral health integration champion) to oversee the implementation and coordination of the team.
  • Identify key actors who will be the core members of the IBH implementation team. Potential members include:
    • Behavioral health providers.
    • Nurses.
    • Panel managers.
    • Clinicians.
    • Social workers.
    • Community health workers and other community outreach staff.
    • A member of the information technology (IT) or electronic health record (EHR) team (as part of the expanded team).
    • Billing manager or similar (as part of the expanded team, especially initially).
    • Patient service representatives, front office staff and reception staff.
    • HR personnel (as part of the expanded team).

Invite identified people to become part of the IBH implementation team and ensure that they have designated time for their participation. Lead with humility and curiosity and ensure that each team member is open to learning about the needs and strengths of people with behavioral health conditions.

3. Launch the IBH implementation team and set it up for success.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: BH lead.

This work includes:

  • The first step for the IBH implementation team will be to develop a preliminary charter outlining the aims, responsibilities and timeline of this work. This includes but may not be limited to: enabling, aligning, leveraging and supporting the planning and implementation of all foundational key activities in this implementation guide so that the practice meets the foundational competencies.
  • Defining roles and responsibilities, including the anticipated commitment (in hours) on a monthly basis.
  • Establishing a meeting structure, file structure and communications structure to support relationship-centered, effective work.
  • Dedicating time and effort to forming, storming, norming and performing as a team. The resource: Team Communication and Working Styles Template is one tool that team members can complete and share with other teammates to accelerate this process.
  • Understanding baseline data related to outcomes of interest (e.g., number of positive depression screens resulting in a IBH appt or percentage of patients screened for substance use disorders (SUD) last year, etc.), along with data related to known and perceived barriers to these outcomes.
  • Prioritizing elements within the scope of work, informed by baseline data and identified population needs.

 

4. Develop a simple yet robust measurement strategy and learning system to guide your improvement efforts.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel managers with behavioral health specialist (especially initially).

A learning system enables a group of people to come together to share and learn about a particular topic, to build knowledge, and to speed up improved outcomes. A simple yet robust measurement strategy and learning system:

  • Contains a balanced set of measures looking at outcomes, processes and possibly unintended secondary effects (e.g., increased cycle time and impact on team well-being).
  • Incorporates the patient perspective and the perspective of staff (front desk and others), care team members and management.
  • Allows the team to determine if the process or system has improved, stayed the same or worsened.
  • Helps guide improvement efforts and informs practice operations. See Appendix A: Sample Idealized System Diagram: Weaving Your Measurement Strategy and Learning System into Practice Operations for a sample system diagram for how your measurement strategy can be used to support practice operations.

Your practice should track the core and supplemental measures for depression screening, follow-up and remission. These can be considered outcome measures because there is ample evidence that improved timely screening and monitoring will improve overall population health outcomes for behavioral health needs.

In addition to the core and supplemental measures, practices should track process measures and balancing measures. Appendix C: Developing a Robust Measurement Strategy describes and defines the key milestones in the development of a robust measurement strategy, including definitions for each of these terms.

Suggested process measures:

  • Percent of 12-and-over patients who had a depression screen in the last 12 months.
  • Percent of positive screening results in the reporting month that have documentation of follow up.
  • Note on tracking these process measures: The PHQ-2 will meet the expectation of screening, with the expectation that positive PHQ-2 screens lead to PHQ-9 administration. The administration of PHQ-9 as a screen will also meet the expectation.

Suggested balancing measures:

  • Number of patients who screened positive on anxiety, depression, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) or SUD screening and who were referred to IBH.
  • Number of patients who were referred and who saw BH within two weeks.
  • One or more measures related to patient satisfaction.
  • One or more measures related to staff satisfaction.

Practices can also look at other metrics to understand the progress of specific improvement initiatives over time. This may include:

  • Progress on the Population Health Management Capabilities Assessment Tool (PhmCAT).
  • Progress towards foundational competencies listed in this implementation guide. For example, “Yes or No: Did your practice achieve the following foundational competency ‘Analyze core quality measures to identify disparities and improvement opportunities for achieving universal depression screening among all attributed adolescents and adults’?”
  • Any other care gaps, clinical guidelines or measures your practice feels are important to prioritize.

 

Applying an equity lens

To correct pervasive health inequities for people of color and other populations who experience historical marginalization, practices can stratify their data based on race, ethnicity and language (REAL), sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), and other patient characteristics (e.g., social needs, etc.), reflect on the data, and consider specific strategies to address them. Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach Address Inequities within the Population of Focus provides a brief overview of known inequities for mental healthcare and how to begin to address them.

Putting it all together

We recommend that your practice records your measurement strategy in one place. This resource: Measurement Strategy Tracker contains all the fields we believe are most useful, and it can be customized to meet your practice’s needs.

5. Plan and hold regularly scheduled meetings of the IBH implementation team to make adjustments based on data from the team’s measurement strategy and feedback loops.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team lead or clinical coordinator or other individual tasked with coordinating the work of the team.

  • Hold time on team members' calendars for standing meetings. Consider meeting twice monthly to start with. The frequency, duration and focus of these meetings may change as you consider additional populations or subpopulations and additional sites or locations and as the nature of the work changes.
  • Develop a system to efficiently report on all work streams and track follow-up items. The resource: Action Plan Template is one tool that can be used to focus your team around the foundational competencies and define responsibility for action steps to be taken for each project your team has prioritized to work on.
  • Review data and feedback at least monthly to celebrate team successes and adapt efforts as needed. Adaptation could include any or all of the following:
    • Amending the charter.
    • Modifying meetings or meeting structures.
    • Changing the team composition (e.g., adding or removing members).
    • Refining key activities to better meet the needs of patients and staff, improve outcomes, or reduce inequities.
    • Modifying the measurement strategy and/or feedback loops to better understand what is and isn’t happening.
    • On an annual basis, the team’s charter and core membership should be reviewed. As the goals of the IBH implementation team are met, the team could disband, meet less frequently (e.g., twice per year), or fold this meeting into a similar standing meeting that occurs separately.

Resources

Health Center Quality Measurement Systems Toolkit

Health Alliance of Northern California created a summary crosswalk of measurement sets, which provides an overview of alignment between measurement systems. It includes in-depth information on each Uniform Data System (UDS) or Quality Incentive Pool (QIP) clinical measure for depression screening and depression remission, which are contained in a spreadsheet. The document also shares suggested clinical interventions and community interventions for depression screening and appropriate follow-up in rural northern California.

KEY ACTIVITY #2:

Enhance the Culture of Integrated Behavioral Healthcare


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: behavioral health integration.

Overview

Promoting a culture of integrated care delivery begins by establishing a clear vision of whole-person care and its implications, ensuring that all clinic staff understand their respective roles in supporting care of the whole person, and addressing the physical, social and behavioral needs of the clinic’s patient population. Although there are a number of models and strategies of IBH for which an evidence base has been developed, there is no single model that is a fit for every organization. Practices should not let their concept of an ideal model get in the way of implementing something that works within their own setting. It’s important for the practice to be continually moving toward an integrated whole-health system with both primary care and behavioral health services. Most organizations continually evolve integrated care services over time, modifying their integration strategies as they gain experience or the availability of resources changes.

Integration of behavioral health and primary care is still relatively new, starting in the early 2000s. Developing integrated care is not as straightforward as simply hiring a behavioral health provider to the practice. It is an ongoing process of culture change and transforming care delivery to support whole-person care. Integration requires more than clinical integration; it requires integration of behavioral health leaders into senior or executive leadership, integration of operational processes related to behavioral health, and intentional power sharing among the care team with purposeful design of workflows. These efforts collectively contribute to an enhanced organizational culture that incorporates the perspectives of multiple professions working together to support patients and families in their care.

Working as a multidisciplinary team in an integrated way provides opportunities for the team to understand a wide range of drivers for health outcomes. Ideally, integration helps the care team make care recommendations that better accommodate patient experience and engage more meaningfully with the interconnectedness between physical health, emotional health and social needs.

IBH enables the care team to tend to whole-person care, making every effort to desilo interventions and interactions with patients. This approach enables essential screening and monitoring of behavioral health needs and the delivery of comprehensive care, with care coordination and collaboration among an integrated care team. For example, a behavioral health specialist reviews the pre-visit plan, notes that the patient is due for diabetes screening, provides grief counseling and offers to link the patient to the medical assistant who then uses a standing order to provide necessary screens (e.g., foot check, etc.). Benefits of integrated behavioral health extend beyond the patient to care team members, as well. Professionals working in integrated settings report increased skills and greater satisfaction with their work as they feel better able to meaningfully respond to patient needs.

IBH services will vary considerably in capacity between practices. Practices in more rural areas typically have much larger IBH departments with significant BH case management and psychiatry resources, while those in urban areas often have smaller IBH departments and nascent case management and psychiatry. This is typically due to the differences in BH resources in the surrounding community; when communities have insufficient BH resources and county systems are constricted, rural practices often build departments to meet all or most of their patient’s BH needs. When communities are rich with BH resources, urban practices often rely more on outside referrals for BH care. In this way, each practice’s IBH vision will be informed by community BH resources as well as the patient population’s needs.

Integrated behavioral health enables patients to gain support in the primary care setting, expanding access to care for groups underserved by community-based behavioral health care. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)’s integration academy provides further discussion of the role of behavioral health integration in reducing inequities by reducing fragmentation, stigma, and healthcare utilization and quality of care and health outcomes, especially for people with depression, anxiety, diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure.

Integrated care allows a team to take a whole-person care approach and begin to understand more fully the root causes of poor health outcomes, potentially leading to improved outcomes in the patient population. Unmet social needs are often a contributor to various behavioral health conditions (see Key Activity 10: Develop a Social Needs Screening Process that Informs Patient Treatment Plans). A culture of integrated healthcare enables the care team to identify unmet needs and help patients connect to community resources. Furthermore, patients who might be hesitant to endorse needs on a social needs screening form may be more likely to disclose these needs in a session with care team members who come off as empathic and nonjudgmental, prompting referrals and connections. Integration of behavioral health screening and counseling, coupled with screening for social needs, can lead to a comprehensive care plan that aligns care to support individuals’ holistic needs and build on their strengths.

Relevant health information technology (HIT) capabilities to support this activity include pre-visit planning tools; care guidelines; registries; clinical decision support; care dashboards and reports, including behavioral health screenings and social needs data; quality reports; outreach and engagement; and care management and care coordination. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

To enable team coordination, thought must be given to how access relevant technology and how data capture can be distributed, consistent and integrated into workflows and how data is accessible across team members. Where possible, it is desirable to avoid duplication of data entry, siloing of information in standalone applications and databases, and the need to work in multiple applications requiring separate login.

Action steps and roles

1. Co-create a shared updated vision for IBH in the practice.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team with senior leaders.

This is an opportunity to evaluate current IBH services, both strengths and shortcomings, and collaborate to establish a shared vision, aims, and strategies for enhanced integrated care. Because integrated behavioral health often means different things to different team members and leaders, this is also a time to align understanding about goals and strategies.

One technique for creating a shared vision is to use patient Journeymapping.[17] It can be especially illuminating to map both examples of current patient journeys through each step of obtaining primary care and behavioral health services as well as the ideal patient journey. Mapping ideal patient journeys can facilitate a shared vision for integrated care, with patient preferences, experiences and outcomes as the north star.
 

2. Align integrated care strategies to the strengths and needs of the population.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team with senior leaders.

Practices have an array of information to review to learn about population needs, including screening results, community or secondary data sources, care team experiences, and patient experience data. Dedicate care team meeting time to reviewing the needs of the population served and current capacity to provide care.

  • Using EHR reports to identify the number of patients with prescribed psychotropic medications can provide a population-level view of a subset of patients with behavioral health conditions in the practice.
  • Review aggregate universal screening data to better understand the behavioral health needs of the population. See Key Activity 7: Use Care Gap Reports or Registries to Identify All Patients Eligible and Due for Behavioral Health Screening and Follow-Up for guidance around leveraging the EHR to understand which patients are due or overdue for screening. More about screening for depression, anxiety, unhealthy substance use, and adverse childhood experiences is detailed later in this guide.
  • Review EHR reports for current population outcome data and develop improvement aims. See Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus for more about ensuring an equity lens on your review data and selection of improvement aims.
  • An evolving view into strengths and needs of people in the population can emerge through the repeated administration of the Three Part Data Review.[18] Consider deploying a care team member with enhanced listening skills to learn from five to 10 patients per quarter. At the same interval, query care team members and review quantitative data, then leverage an existing meeting to assemble the learning from the three-art data review, identify themes, surface opportunities for improvement, and plan tests of change.
  • Calculate the current capacity for providing behavioral health services and the established level of need. Develop short- and long-term population health goals; for most practices, it is unlikely there is currently enough capacity to meet the practice population’s behavioral health needs. See Key Activity 4: Develop Strategies to Maximize Capacity of IBH Services for more information.

 

3. Confirm a set of IBH strategies that aligns with the organization’s aims, the population’s strengths and needs, and organizational capacity.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team with senior leaders.

Assess the existing state of behavioral health integration within the clinic to define the organization’s current strategies for IBH while keeping the overarching vision as a north star.

Integrating behavioral health into your practice may involve an embedded behavioral health specialist on the care team, co-location of services working with a behavioral health partner, a telehealth model, or a blended approach.

Define a set of strategies to meet the specific needs and build on the strengths of the patient population, and then develop workflows for behavioral health conditions to guide the care team in defining their roles. Co-designing strategies and workflows with patients is an impactful way of ensuring relevance of interventions and strengthening partnerships with patients; the practice’s consumer advisory board is a natural fit for this. Codifying workflows and using them to guide staff and onboard new team members supports standardized care delivery and fosters team members’ growing comfort in addressing behavioral health and social needs.

Examples of aims and strategies of the updated IBH vision might be:

  • Increasing the ratio of behavioral health clinicians to one to every two primary care providers.
  • Incorporating a behavioral healthcare manager or BH care coordinator on each care team.
  • Ensuring primary care providers (PCPs) are competent, comfortable and willing to manage medications for depression, anxiety and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
  • Increasing operational integration.
  • Training all SUD providers to do mental health counseling.
  • Integrating psychiatric specialists into the practice.
  • Developing a feasible model for warm handoffs, using interns or community health workers (CHWs).

 

4. Develop relationship-based collaboration among the multidisciplinary care team.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH providers or leaders, outside trainers.

IBH requires a practice to assess the skills and capacities your team has and make reasonable efforts to align needed support with the needs and strengths of your patients. When the IBH care team is assembled, the ongoing work of cultivating relationships among care team members begins. Leadership must establish expectations that care team members will identify their own skills and learn about those of their colleagues, learning about each other’s roles with patients and families and among the care team. Leadership will support the team to acknowledge and have the resources to spend the time and effort required to develop trust among the care team and continuously attend to the development of a shared language. Conduct regular check-ins to reinforce shared language and update the shared language based on emerging research and best practices. Develop and support staff capacity to recognize and manage their own trauma histories that they bring into patient care.

Build opportunities to develop a shared understanding among the care team. Staff training is a great opportunity to leverage reflection time and highlight staff members’ strengths and learning potential (e.g., identify roles who could provide screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) interventions at the time of the visit). Train all staff in trauma-informed care and early identification. Assess staff understanding of health equity, health literacy and cultural humility; implement training programs to address gaps. For connection to social needs resources, train staff (e.g. front desk staff, medical assistants, behavior health specialist, etc.) on available community resources.

For more on this topic, see Key Activity 12A: Fostering Collaborative Teamwork with a Focus on Power Sharing Among Disciplines.
 

5. Universally train all relevant employees in administering and responding to sensitive screenings.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH providers or leaders, outside trainers.

Screenings are only effective when patients feel comfortable with self-disclosure. People with substance use disorders, adverse childhood experiences, and other mental health conditions are often understandably hesitant to endorse symptoms in screening, given that behavioral health conditions are historically stigmatized and many patients who have disclosed these conditions may have experienced judgment in healthcare settings.

 

6. Establish parity of behavioral health and medical departments.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: CEO, CMO, CBHO, board.

Transforming the care delivery system to address whole-person health and improve population well-being requires integration of behavioral health leadership at the executive level. Elevating BH leadership to chief behavioral health officers (CBHOs) with parity to chief medical officers (CMOs) and a seat at the executive leadership table is fundamental to creating true integrated care systems.

Implementation tips

See Key Activity 3: Enhance Operational Integration of Behavioral Health for other tips and resources that will support operational integration.

KEY ACTIVITY #3:

Enhance Operational Integration of Behavioral Health


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: behavioral health integration.

Overview

Integrated care delivery needs a foundation of integrated operations, including practice management, scheduling appointments, teamwide access to patient data in the EHR, integrated consent forms, and more.

Integrated operations support the integration of care delivery with team access to departmental data and administrative support. A purposeful intent to integrate practice operations will avoid the pitfalls of separate, duplicative or insufficient operational infrastructures. Without sufficient operational integration, administrative and operational tasks often fall on BH clinicians, taking away from clinical time and potentially contributing to burnout, while clumsy integration may be experienced as disruptive or distracting by the care team and patients alike. Operational integration builds on the strengths and structure of existing operational resources, protocols, policies, workflows and practices.

Practices can mitigate individual case-by-case decisions, which leave more room for bias by integrating behavioral health operations and administration with existing structures, protocols, policies, workflows, support structures, and standardized decision-making. Without integrated operations, administrative and operational tasks can become unacknowledged and unpaid labor, often performed by lower wage staff.

When IBH is integrated operationally, building out social needs screening and response processes is straightforward and efficient. Many of the strategies listed in this section are applicable to integrating social needs care, such as integrated consents to treat.

Relevant health information technology (HIT) capabilities to support this activity include pre-visit planning tools; EHR documentation tools (e.g., templates and screeners); care guidelines; registries; care dashboards and reports, including behavioral health screenings and social needs data; quality reports; outreach; and care management and care coordination data. Tools needed for business intelligence include productivity and access data. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

To enable team coordination, thought must be given to how to access relevant technology, how data capture can be distributed, consistent, and integrated into workflows, and how data is accessible across team members. Where possible, it is desirable to address the issue of siloing information in standalone applications with a goal of increased sharing of clinical diagnoses across the organization (e.g., BH and medical).

Action steps and roles

Suggested team member(s) responsible: CBHO, CMO, COO or clinic director, IT lead, QI lead.

Examples of operational integration methods include:

  • Develop integrated forms: Implement a single consent to treat form and a single release of information form, both of which include all services offered at the organization. Given the differing legal and regulatory expectations between medical and behavioral health professions, this exercise requires modifications to existing forms, legal review, and retraining staff in information sharing practices. Example forms are provided in the resources section below.
  • Integrate the electronic health record: Behavioral health providers must be considered full providers in the EHR system and be able to chart in an integrated health record with minimal firewalls or separate confidential tabs. BH diagnosis should populate within a shared problem or diagnosis list. Organizations should also have a behavioral health EHR trainer to support behavioral health providers.
  • Integrate policies and procedures: All policies and procedures become integrated, addressing both medical and behavioral health. For example, procedures for urgent psychiatric situations can be added to those for urgent medical situations. Similarly, behavioral health protocols can be added to protocols for triage, referrals, and call center guidance scripts. New policies may need to be created, such as an integrated records policy and a policy to guide decisions on seeing employees as patients.
  • Integrate administrative support: All administrative support provided to medical providers and teams is provided to behavioral health providers, typically proportional to the number of patient visits. This includes receptionist and call center support for scheduling or rescheduling; integration of behavioral health services into the organization's appointment reminder system and missed appointment follow-up system; proportionally equal access to language interpretation and translation services; support for copying, filing, filling out forms, and sending letters to and for patients; and equal assistance for referrals from the organization’s referral clerks or center.
  • Represent behavioral health services in community-facing products: Behavioral health services are on the organization's website, printed marketing materials, community reports, posters, and other community-facing products. Behavioral health is also represented at community outreach events, such as health fairs. Within the organization, behavioral health providers are identified the same way medical providers are. For example, if medical providers have their names on the door or wall of the site and have business cards in the reception area, behavioral health providers have the same.
  • Ensure parity of behavioral health treatment supplies: Behavioral health providers have a standard ordering process for their treatment supplies, just as medical providers have a standard ordering process for their equipment. The importance of supplies such as appropriate furniture and alternative lighting, as well as games for child patients or specific books for patients, are treated as equivalent to stethoscopes or exam tables for medical providers.
  • Ensure QI and IT operational support for IBH: Just as it is done for the medical department, regular reports on productivity, cost, revenue and QI are run specifically for the IBH department.
  • Support recruitment and retention: The organization’s human resources (HR) department provides support in developing job descriptions, recruitment postings, candidate selection, and hiring and retention. HR should have a behavioral health-informed hiring and selection process that is tailored to the specifics of practicing in an integrated setting.

Resources

AHRQ Integration Academy Playbook

Web-based comprehensive guide from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) on behavioral health and primary care integration. Resources range from planning for integration, including creating a vision, preparing the infrastructure in your setting, and establishing protocols and clinical workflows to manage and treat your patients. The self-assessment checklist takes about 10 minutes and can be completed by members of the IBH team before, during or after implementation of integration strategies to assess the practice’s progress on integration.

KEY ACTIVITY #4:

Develop Strategies to Maximize Capacity of IBH Services


 

This key activity involves all seven elements of person-centered population-based care: behavioral health integration.

Overview

This key activity involves conducting a gap analysis to determine the scope of needed behavioral health support and developing strategies to provide such support. Strategies may include training medical assistants and CHWs to provide behavioral health support, enhancing medical providers’ skills to identify and support behavioral health needs, and recruiting a range of behavioral health support functions.

Like much of the nation’s healthcare delivery system, there is a severe shortage of BH providers in California. A report published by the University of California, San Francisco in 2018 – even before the pandemic sent need skyrocketing – predicted that, by 2028, demand for behavioral health clinicians will be 40% more than supply. This shortage is a significant barrier to sufficient staffing of IBH departments across California’s practices. The overwhelming majority of Community Health Centers (CHCs) are deeply understaffed to meet the behavioral health needs of the community served. Research consistently shows that 70% of primary care visits are psychosocial-related,[19] and over 40% of primary care patients want and need behavioral health services.[20]

Chronic disease management is enhanced by attending to behavioral health needs, as patients are better able to engage in chronic disease management activities, including the behavior change that is required to manage their chronic conditions, when their behavioral health needs are met. Additionally, patients are more likely to feel connected to and supported by the practice when their BH needs are met, potentially increasing the kept appointment rate.

At the same time, working in integrated ways offers team members the camaraderie and support of sharing and shouldering the work together, supporting staff retention. On a practical level, each member of the integrated care team learns new skills in the process of working in integrated ways together.

People of color and non-English-speaking patients have worse access to behavioral health services in comparison to white English-speaking patients. Expanding the capacity of behavioral health services, with a focus on BH providers who are culturally and linguistically concordant with the population served, is fundamental to equitable health outcomes.

Relevant health information technology (HIT) capabilities to support this activity include patient registries, care guidelines, quality reports, outreach, care management and care coordination data, and patient surveys. Tools needed for business intelligence include patient population-level data (e.g., total patients served, including REAL data, managed care plan (MCP) attribution), provider productivity (particularly behavioral health), and access data.

See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps and roles

As most organizations have some level of IBH services, it may be helpful for the leadership team, including BH leaders, to complete an IBH organizational depth- assessment. A baseline assessment of behavioral health capacity can help in developing a plan for future broadening and deepening of BH services.

1. Conduct a gap analysis to determine the number of BH providers necessary to meet the patient population's needs.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team.

A simple gap analysis formula is based on research that consistently shows 70% of primary care visits are psychosocial-related[21] and over 40% of primary care patients want and/or need behavioral health services.[22] However, not all patients with behavioral health conditions will be best served by the practice. Estimating the number of patients with behavioral health needs that may be appropriate for care from county behavioral health systems or another system of care is important in developing an accurate estimate of the number of patients who are most likely to obtain BH care within the practice. This calculation will vary between organizations, as each practice is unique, as are the surrounding communities. Some communities will have more resources to care for people with BH conditions, in which case a practice may refer out a higher percentage of patients. Many practices, however, are in communities with few resources for BH care; practices may be the primary or only provider for BH care in the region. In this case, calculating a gap analysis would include a higher number of patients with BH needs being cared for within the practice.

By taking into account the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) behavioral health providers and the number of patients an average behavioral health provider sees per month, organizations can estimate a rough number of the behavioral health providers required to meet the practice’s patient population needs.

Most practices will fall within the range of needing one behavioral health provider per 1,000 to 3,000 patients or one behavioral health provider per one to two primary care providers (PCPs typically have panels of about 1,400 patients). The PHMI Care Teams and Workforce Guide emphasizes this ideal ratio (see Figure 3 for ideal ratios and Figure 4 for recommended licensure):

  • One BH specialist, such as a licensed clinical social worker (LCSW) or licensed marriage and family therapist (LMFT) to every two PCP panels to provide day-to-day support both for the care team and patients with behavioral health needs. Currently in California, LMFT services are considered part of the prospective payment system (PPS) rate. While most health centers seek to hire a BH specialist for whom they can bill separately, there are some teams that hire an LMFT to provide brief targeted interventions and support holistic patient care. This staffing model for integrated BH provides a more indirect return on investment through its potential positive impacts on primary care provider retention.
  • One consulting BH provider (e.g., clinical psychologist or other psychiatric prescriber) for every 10 PCP panels to provide pharmacological treatments or extensive psychological testing.

The ratio is meant to give practices a framework and goal for developing behavioral health as a core service line over time. The necessary staffing ratio will be clarified through continuous monitoring of emerging patient needs and maintaining current and evolving knowledge of community resources. As care team members, such as primary care providers and nurses are increasingly confident in their ability to assess and respond to patient health behavior changes, behavioral health resources will increasingly be leveraged for care delivery focused on patients with behavioral health conditions that require a higher level of care.

FIGURE 3: RECOMMENDED RATIOS AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SELECT CORE CARE TEAM AND EXPANDED CARE TEAM MEMBER TO SUPPORT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION


Collaborating Care Team Member

Primary Responsibilities

Recommended Ratio*

CORE CARE TEAM

Day-to-Day; Organized, Evidence-Based Care

Primary Care Provider (PCP)

Provides direct patient care, including diagnoses and treatment.

One FTE per panel

Medical Assistant (MA)

Assists the PCP with direct patient care and is responsible for patient flow on the day of a visit, including pre-visit planning and visit/room preparation.

One FTE per panel

Social Health Support/Community Health Worker (CW)

Helps identify and connect patients to social health services.

0.5 FTE per panel

Behavioral Health Specialist

Provides day-to-day support for care team and patients with behavioral health needs.

0.5 FTE per panel

EXPANDED CARE TEAM

Behavioral Health Integration

Behavioral Health Consultants

Clinical psychologist and psychiatrist provide additional behavioral health services through psychological evaluation, substance use disorder diagnosis and treatment, and prescribing medications.

One FTE shared across approximately 10 panels

Medication Management

Clinical Pharmacist

Medication management and patient/provider medication education.

One FTE shared across approximately 10 panels

FIGURE 4: CARE TEAM DUTIES AND RECOMMENDED LICENSURE FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION


Care Team Role

Expanded Duties

Recommended Education/Licensure

  • Has lived experience with the process of recovery from mental health or substance use concerns, or both, either as a consumer of these services or as the parent or family member of the consumer.

Behavioral Health Specialists:

Licensed Social Worker (LCSW)

Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT)

  • Provides day-to-day support for the care team and patients with behavioral health needs.
  • Works with expanded care team members, including the clinical psychologist and psychiatrist to manage patients with more complex needs.
  • Can provide brief interventions using evidence-based techniques such as behavioral activation, problem-solving treatment, and motivational interviewing.

As per state licensure.

Consulting Behavioral Health Providers:

Clinical Psychologist

  • Provides psychological evaluation and conducts more extensive testing than the behavioral health specialists.
  • Works closely with the PCP and the other behavioral health consultants but cannot prescribe medications.
  • Provides treatment ranging from cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, group therapy, and hypnotherapy.

As per state licensure.

Psychiatrist or Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP)

  • Provides direct mental health and substance use diagnosis and treatment, including prescribing medications.
  • Works closely with the PCP and the care team, including the behavioral health specialists.

MD with specialty training in psychiatry.

NP with specialty training in psychiatry.

Clinical Pharmacist

  • Reviews medical records and assesses progress towards goals to improve patient health.
  • Makes suggestions and collaborates with providers on medication management.
  • Completes patient visits for medication review and management.
  • Makes recommendations for medication adjustments, dosage titration, initiation, and discontinuation, and monitors laboratory values in collaboration with providers and patients.
  • Educates patients about the use of their medications.
  • Attends team meetings for chronic disease management and participates in the development of patient care plans.

Note: See Care Teams Resource 1 for additional information.

Doctor of Pharmacy degree.

Many have completed post-graduate training.

2. Identify core strategies to increase BH provider capacity.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH Implementation team.

Most practices are not at the ratio of BH providers necessary to meet the needs of the practice’s population. Below are options for increasing capacity to provide integrated behavioral healthcare.

  • Expand the scope of care team members to provide mental health counseling.
    • Motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral interventions, behavioral activation, psychoeducation, skillful listening, and supportive counseling are all evidenced-based treatments for behavioral health conditions. Licensure is not legally or ethically necessary to engage in these interventions. Grouped together, these interventions can be referred to as behavioral health counseling, behavioral health coaching, or other names that fit within your practice’s conventions.
    • Training selected CHWs, case managers, SUD counselors, and care coordinators in the interventions above can significantly increase access to IBH services. Providing clinical supervision, support, and continued learning from licensed clinicians ensures continual growth and safety. Mental health counselors without traditional licenses or degrees have been shown to have to have outcomes comparable to licensed clinicians and are widely used in lower-income countries as a solution to clinician scarcity.[23]
    • In addition to addressing access, this strategy addresses the need for more linguistic and cultural concordance in the BH workforce with the community served.
  • Two training providers that offer programs to build capacity of frontline staff include The Lay Counselor Academy, Harvard University’s EMPOWER initiative, and CETA Global. Note these offerings may have an associated fee.
    • Asian Health Services, Hill Country Health and Wellness, and San Ysidro Health are just a few of the California Community Health Center (CHC) practices that have invested heavily in this strategy.
  • Reduce barriers to enhance recruitment of licensed BH providers.
    • Eliminate criteria that are barriers to employment for licensed and unlicensed associate social worker (ASW) clinicians, such as mandating full-time work, employee status, and in-person work. Recruit for any number of hours from anywhere in the state.
    • Salud Para La Gente and Alexander Valley Health Centers use this strategy successfully by hiring licensed clinicians who live in different areas of California and are fully remote.
  • Focus on associate social worker (ASW) recruitment.
    • In California, ASWs are billable for the PPS rate for FQHCs since May 2020. Focus on recruitment of ASWs, who are less expensive than licensed clinicians, more likely to be bicultural and bilingual, and able to bill for the same rate as licensed clinicians. ASWs are required by the Board of Behavioral Sciences of California to have two to three hours of supervision a week; if supervision needs exceed the practice’s licensed clinician capacity, contract for outside supervision.
    • Community Medical Centers, which has one of the most robust BH departments in California and one of the highest ratios of BH providers to PCPs, utilizes this strategy.

Implementation tips

Deepening integrated care may feel like a big lift and can appear overwhelming to staff. Practice leaders will need to emphasize shared values and develop a north star for care transformation. Leadership must regularly name the challenge of the scarcity of behavioral health providers, recognize the care team’s efforts to navigate that challenge, highlight the strategic importance of growing the team’s capacity to provide behavioral healthcare, and celebrate wins along the way.

See the below resources for examples of how this activity has been implemented.

KEY ACTIVITY #5:

Enhance Inreach and Outreach to Engage People in Behavioral Healthcare


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: proactive patient outreach and engagement; behavioral health integration.

Overview

Inreach means to do outreach to patients already within the practice. Most IBH departments in community clinic settings see less than 10% of total patients, marking a significant gap between those who need and those engaged in behavioral health care. Most practices have thousands of patients who are struggling with behavioral health symptoms and are not engaged in behavioral healthcare. Clearly communicating to patients within the organization about behavioral health conditions and the availability of BH services can help connect patients to needed treatment. Successful inreach uses language and media that reflects the preferences of different populations served by the practice.

Outreach is connecting outside of the organization and the practice’s established patients to engage people with behavioral health needs in care. This is typically done in partnership with other community agencies, schools, emergency departments and other organizations.

Practices can begin by enhancing and expanding inreach to engage more of their established population with behavioral health needs in care. As capacity grows, practices can work with partner organizations to expand outreach activities. Note that engaging in inreach or outreach strategies is only feasible when there is behavioral health capacity to offer patients; see Key Activity 4: Develop Strategies to Maximize Capacity of IBH Services.

One of the distinguishing factors between population behavioral health and usual care is the commitment to providing care and services to those not already engaged. Population behavioral health takes into account all patients in the organization (inreach) and all people in the community (outreach), assesses how many people need behavioral healthcare, and develops strategies to proactively engage people in care.

Inreach and outreach are informed by a variety of data and information sources and do not rely solely on individual referrals. Using secondary data sources, existing community assessments, and information from partner organizations (outreach) and data from the EHR and the local health plans (inreach), the practice will be able to identify, prioritize, and implement meaningful interventions to engage patients in behavioral healthcare.

Proactive inreach and outreach, when intentionally focused on communities that have experienced racism, bias and discrimination, is a crucial intervention to eliminate health inequities. Through inreach and outreach, organizations can develop specific strategies to engage particular groups or communities by providing information and a welcoming environment to patients of historically underserved and under-resourced groups inside and outside the practice. This is best done in collaboration with staff (inreach) and community partners (outreach) who are representative of and trusted by the community.

Health-related social needs (e.g., income insecurity, transportation issues, and health literacy) can result in no-shows and deterioration of patient health status. Proactive inreach and outreach, coupled with awareness of health-related social needs, can facilitate connecting patients to community resources and developing greater trust in the care team.

Recognizing that trauma and its sources can lead to lower engagement, consider identifying a staff member or peer leader who is very skilled in empathic listening to reach out to patients to learn what gets in the way of engaging in behavioral health services, as well as the supports that they would most appreciate and would be most effective. This could be through email or text, phone, in-person conversation, or in focus groups. Health centers have different care team members fill this role, including community health workers, health educators, medical assistants, medical social workers, care coordinators and managers.

This activity relies on similar capabilities as care gap management, utilizing population views and registries to identify patients who would benefit from behavioral health engagement. These registries can be utilized to generate inreach and outreach lists for care team members who might be tasked with engaging patients in behavioral health services. Many EHRs can store next-appointment data that can also be used to generate lists supporting these efforts. In addition, EHR alerts and prompts can be leveraged to identify patients for engagement. Care managers and/or behavioral health team members might use care management applications to document engagement efforts.

Other relevant HIT capabilities to support this activity include clinical decision support and communication platforms, such as texting. Some health centers may focus extra resources on patients identified as having elevated risk through risk stratification algorithms.

See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps and roles

1. Understand the behavioral healthcare needs of the practice’s patients and community patients.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Population health staff, data analyst, clinical leaders.

  • Inreach: Mine practice data and local health plan data to better understand health inequities, patterns of use, and unmet needs of the practice’s population. The following suggestions are potential options for analysis and over time your team will determine which data sources illuminate your patient population’s health inequities, using patterns and unmet needs.
    • Review practice data for opportunities to improve BH engagement for existing patients. Data of particular interest may include, for example, the number of patients engaged with BH over the last 12 months, by race or ethnicity; the number of patients on psychotropic medications with no behavioral health visits; the percent of postpartum patients engaged in BH in the last year; patients with positive scores on depression, anxiety, ACE and SUD screenings in the last year with no behavioral healthcare; or patients with more than two ER visits in the last year.
    • Partner with local health plans to gather data on the practice’s patient population with regard to BH needs. Examples of BH-related data from health plans include patients’ emergency department usage, hospitalizations, pharmacy claims for opioids or any psychotropic medication, and patients assigned to the practice with no visit in the last year, etc.
  • Outreach: Partner with community leaders, state agencies or professional bodies to obtain data on BH conditions in your area.
    • Initiate or strengthen connections to county behavioral health departments, community-based social needs organizations, schools, hospitals, and faith groups. Let potential partners know that you are interested in improving access to BH services and ask them if they would participate in a conversation with you about what they see as the priority needs in the community. The conversation might start with a simple question like, “In your experience, what BH needs are unmet in your client or patient population?” As the partnership takes shape, establish regular meeting times, communication norms and other relational strategies. Consider business agreements or other formal arrangements to share data.

 

2. Develop or enhance inreach and outreach to all patients and community members, prioritizing patient preference, dignity, autonomy and readiness.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinical leaders, operation managers, staff.

Inreach strategies include:

  • Develop patient-facing materials in the languages of populations served. Examples include:
    • Posters for the waiting room, which list common BH concerns, BH services at the practice, and how to make an appointment with a BH provider.
    • Pamphlets about high-prevalence BH conditions, such as depression, anxiety, ACEs and SUD; include the practice’s IBH information and how to make an appointment.
    • Text blasts or telephone hold messages that inform patients that BH services are available and how to make an appointment.
  • Develop a list of patients with BH needs using data reports (examples above) from the EHR or the health plan, then assign skillful BH case managers or care coordinators to call patients on the list and offer them BH services.
  • Using data reports, have a medical assistant or other staff add alerts or other prompts within the EHR for patients on the list to indicate to staff and providers to discuss and offer BH services when they next come in for care.
  • Collaborate with leaders and staff in other departments to develop specific inreach strategies for subpopulations with high behavioral health needs (e.g., patients obtaining medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder, pregnant and postpartum patients, or patients with chronic pain).
  • Develop standardized clinical pathways for subpopulations of focus (e.g., automatic referrals for patients who score positive on BH screening tools, have chronic pain, or with a recent discharge from the ER).
  • Employ inclusive communication methods grounded in cultural humility. Language that is congruent with patient preference is the first step. Utilize EHR data to align the communication method (e.g., call, text, email) with patient preferences.
  • Select staff to carry out inreach based on the strength of the existing relationship with the patient group of focus (e.g., selecting Comprehensive Perinatal Services Program (CPSP) staff for inreach to pregnant and parenting patients; the cultural and language congruence with the patients of focus; and the available time of the staff.
  • Ensure all inreach activities prioritize patient autonomy. Inreach explains BH services and offers BH services; the nature of inreach is supportive, not mandatory.
  • Ensure inreach activities take into account patient preferences. When patients receive care aligned with their preferences – both location and type of treatment – adherence is higher and health outcomes are improved.[24]

Outreach strategies include:

  • Co-designing outreach services with people in the population of focus is a best practice. Engage members of the consumer advisory board and the consumer members of the practice’s own board to co-design outreach methods.
  • Reaching out to leaders who are trusted by the communities that you are trying to engage in care. Ask current patients where they feel supported in the community. Take your outreach to the community by making appearances at churches, schools, community centers, farmer’s markets, food pantries, homeless shelters or other gathering places. Consider deploying community outreach workers to build relationships with potential patients by engaging in their neighborhoods.
  • Deepening relationships with organizations that are part of the provider network in your community. County behavioral health departments, county BH contractors, SUD treatment organizations and housing agencies all likely have clients and patients who need BH services. Develop business agreements, formal referral pathways and informal communication norms.
  • Developing a social media presence for broader community outreach. Consider leveraging staff who are active social media users to help with optimizing your social media presence. Co-design campaigns promoting health and wellness with community partners (e.g., an “It’s OK to not be OK” campaign). Outreach to the community in partnership with community-based organizations may bring new patients to the practice and has the potential of strengthening relationships with community-based organizations that address behavioral or social needs.
  • Focusing outreach to spur referrals by community partners, which requires relationship building. Consider onboarding visits, which can be done as group visits, that welcome new patients to the health center and help develop comfort with accessing the health center, introducing them to their prospective care team members.

Tip: Establish a process for engaging patients assigned to your practice who have not yet been seen by their managed care team. Depending on your agreement with the health plans, it is important for practices to make a proactive plan to build capacity to accommodate assigned-but-not-yet-seen health plan patients in the clinic. Consider developing strategies for outreach and engagement with these populations in order to shift them from not yet seen to fully engaged in primary care, as well as a process for patients not yet seen for whom outreach may be unsuccessful. These patients may be getting their preventive and behavioral healthcare elsewhere though still assigned to the practice.
 

3. Prioritize inreach and outreach opportunities based on available practice resources.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: All care team members.

For both inreach and outreach, ensure the selected staff, team, or practice champion have the necessary time and support to conduct activities.

Regarding inreach, practices may have significantly more BH needs within the current patient population than resources to meet the needs. In this case, identify a prioritized group for inreach. You may consider subpopulations that align with a focus of other concurrent initiatives (e.g., patients with adverse childhood experiences, if the practice is involved in trauma-informed care (TIC) efforts), groups who have worse health outcomes, or groups whose needs match the practice’s resources (e.g., inreach to those with substance use disorders, if the practice has IBH staff and clinicians who treat SUD).

Regarding outreach, behavioral health needs in the larger community are likely to be significant. Schools, law enforcement systems, social care organizations and other behavioral health agencies are most certainly in need of behavioral healthcare for their patients, students, clients and families. You may already be aware of many pressing BH needs in the community or you may learn about such needs in the process of outreach to partner organizations. The practice may only have resources to work with one population of focus at a time, so building a stepped approach to partnership will conserve resources and allow the team to build on successes.

Implementation tips

An important element of proactive outreach is to strengthen relationships with community partners. Building trust and mutual understanding is essential and takes time, and there are ups and downs as organizations, staff and leaders change. There is no shortcut to building trust and shared goals. After one or several meetings, and maybe a false start or two, the focus can center on collaborative projects. See more about going deeper with Key Activity 18: Strengthen Community Partnerships.

KEY ACTIVITY #6:

Expand Access to Integrated Care


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: proactive patient outreach and engagement; behavioral health integration.

Overview

Expand access to integrated care by offering connection to behavioral health services in the primary care setting. Depression, anxiety, substance use disorder, and other health conditions are frequently co-occurring. Opportunities to identify and address the range of healthcare needs of patients is enhanced in an integrated delivery system where hand-offs between primary care and behavioral health are supported. Behavioral health integration offers essential access to care to people with behavioral health needs, including therapy, referrals, and other needed services. The primary care setting is a familiar care access point and may support patients to overcome hesitancy around seeking behavioral healthcare.

As noted elsewhere in this guide, there is a severe shortage of BH providers in California. Combined with the stigma often associated with behavioral health issues and their treatment, this has resulted in a mismatch between the prevalence of BH conditions and the number of people who have access to effective treatment. Closing the gap between need and access to care presents a major challenge, but research has shown that integrating behavioral health into primary care is an effective approach to achieving this end.

While BH integration provides access to needed BH services through trusted entry points to the healthcare system, it is imperative to maximize the use of limited available BH resources. This includes making care delivery efficient by standardization of protocols, using a team approach, leveraging technology, and other means.

Access to integrated behavioral healthcare lowers barriers to care for all and may especially benefit groups who have been historically disadvantaged from receiving mental health services or are otherwise reluctant to seek care. See Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus for a discussion of known inequities in care and additional strategies for addressing inequitable outcomes.

When patients are engaged in behavioral health services, their social needs may be more likely to be addressed. Patients who might be hesitant to endorse needs on a social needs screening form may be more likely to disclose these needs in a session with behavioral health specialists who have been trained to appear as empathic and nonjudgmental, prompting referrals and connections by leveraging other members of the integrated care team.

This activity relies on strategies similar to inreach and outreach, including population reports and registries that identify patients who would benefit from behavioral health engagement. These registries can be utilized by care team members who might be tasked with engaging patient in behavioral health services. In addition, EHR alerts or prompts can be leveraged to identify patients for engagement. Care managers and/or behavioral health team members might use care management applications to document engagement efforts. Messaging platforms can be leveraged to support team communication and warm handoffs.

Some health centers may focus extra resources on patients identified as having elevated risk through risk stratification algorithms.

See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps

1. Encourage "no wrong door" to behavioral health.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic manager or director with clinical champions (e.g., BH lead, CMO) and IBH implementation team.

The clinic manager or director works with clinical champions (e.g., BH lead, CMO) to clearly allow all staff to refer patients to behavioral health when staff deem it necessary (e.g., positive screen or any other reason). The IBH implementation team designs workflows for all staff to be able to refer patients to behavioral health.

This means any staff member can refer a patient to behavioral health at any time for any reason. For example, a receptionist may speak by phone to a tearful patient, a medical assistant may administer the PHQ-2 with positive screening results, or a nurse passing through the waiting room may be engaged in urgent conversation by a waiting patient. Staff are encouraged to refer the patient to the care team’s behavioral health specialist in all of these circumstances. See Key Activity 2: Enhance the Culture of Integrated Behavioral Healthcare for more about universally training all relevant employees in administering and responding to sensitive screenings. Additionally, consider ways to build behavioral health screening into other instances of patient engagement, such as waiting for a nurse visit or in a pre-visit screening call.
 

2. Evaluate current warm handoff practices to enhance effectiveness and feasibility.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team.

Many organizations already have some type of warm handoff practices. An ideal state is for the medical provider or other staff trained in empathic communication techniques to respond to a patient’s positive screen by connecting the patient to BH, whether it is through a warm handoff or setting an appointment.

Enhance warm handoff practices by deploying unbillable trained staff instead of billable clinicians to respond to warm handoffs. This can assist with financial feasibility by reserving direct warm handoffs to a clinician for high-risk, complex needs patients. Staff training must also include responding to patient reports of suicidal ideation in a timely manner.

Consider evaluating the percentage of patient visits that include warm handoffs, effectiveness in lowering missed first appointment rates, impact on patient and provider experience, and financial feasibility, due to the lack of reimbursement in California.
 

3. Address biases to promote equitable access to care.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: All staff.

Increase self-awareness of staff biases and enhance cultural humility to support equitable detection, referral patterns, and treatment. The research identifies deep inequities in detection, referrals and treatment of mental health conditions for people of color and patients from the LGBTQ+ community.

  • Ensure diverse representation among the staff and care team to enhance sensitivity to different cultural identities.
  • Provide anti-bias and cultural humility training at intervals to ensure wide staff participation.
  • Surface champions among the staff team and build opportunities in regular staff meetings to share cultural humility approaches and challenges.
  • Regularly review data on access to and engagement in care, specifically through the lens of equity, and look for groups who have less access to or engagement in care to identify those for whom the current care design is not effective. This information is instrumental in identifying areas in which to test ways to improve access and engagement among the effected groups. See Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus for more.

Resources to consider:

 

4. Leverage peer support.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Members of the patient and family advisory council, community health workers, and community-based leaders or influencers working together with clinical staff to design a peer support program.

  • Peer support training: Train individuals with lived experience to provide peer support to patients dealing with behavioral health challenges. Best practices on peer support specialists are included in this resource from the Steadman Group and in the University of Kansas’s Community Tool Box resource on peer Support Groups.
  • Support groups: Establish support groups to create a sense of community and shared experiences among patients. Rely on the behavioral health specialist to guide the process and frame the support group to meet the needs and build on the strengths of the patient group.
  • Collaborate with community resources: Strengthen partnerships with local community organizations offering peer support services to expand the range of available resources. County mental health agencies or organizations provide peer support specialists as a reimbursable benefit for Medi-Cal patients. To learn more about which counties provide peer support resources, visit the Medi-Cal Peer Support Services site.

 

5. Leverage community resources.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic staff with care coordination responsibilities.

This strategy is described in more detail in other places in this guide:

 

6. Sustain the integrated care practices in the face of conflicting demands.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Senior leadership and IBH implementation team.

Develop methods to support and sustain the integrated care team, including setting attainable goals for care delivery, fostering communication among the care team, developing standard workflows to guide care delivery, and providing adequate training and supervision.

KEY ACTIVITY #6B:

Incorporate Preventive Activities into Acute Visits


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration; address social needs.

Overview

Ensuring that prevention activities are incorporated into acute visit appointments expands access to care. This creates opportunities to build interventions that are responsive to patients’ and families’ needs and preferences for engaging in the health system.

For people with behavioral health conditions, behavioral health screening activities can be incorporated into acute visits, if such screenings are aligned with patient preferences.

Melding well-care activities into acute visits meets the patient and/or their family where they are and maximizes the value of their time in the clinic with a focus on prevention. A sizable percentage of a clinic’s patient population will only seek care when they require an acute visit, so it makes sense to provide as much opportunity for quality care during these visits as possible.

Patients and families who live in poverty and whose opportunities have been limited by disinvestment are likely to benefit from the ability to access preventive care when they are able to visit the clinic. For example, patients who balance competing demands may struggle to keep scheduled appointments and benefit from having the opportunity to engage in wellness care during a sick visit. Due to financial constraints, patients and their families may prioritize urgent care over routine or preventive care.

Screening at acute visits is one way for care teams to take a whole-person care approach. For people with behavioral health conditions, incorporating routine screening into acute visits ensures that all patients are screened for mental health and unhealthy substance use. Universal screening can support destigmatizing behavioral health needs. Furthermore, even when the patient identifies the presenting problem as physical, the visit often comprises a psychosocial dimension.

Clinical decision support to prompt the care team to attend to preventive care during all visits is an effective strategy. Ideally, these could be positioned to be available to the extended care team and not restricted to the medical clinician. Prompting strategies can be reinforced through the availability of care guideline-driven order sets and standing orders (see above) available in the EHR. Care quality and care gap reports, analyzed against visit history, can be utilized to track progress by clinician and care team in leveraging sick visit opportunities to meet guidelines. Pre-visit planning supports the identification of existing care gaps.

See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps and roles

1. Use pre-visit planning.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: QI lead, care team lead, frontline staff.

Deploy a pre-visit planning process that includes a pre-visit checklist, incorporation of data from registries and care gap reports, and a staff huddle to identify which patients with scheduled acute visits are due for behavioral health screenings. See Key Activity 8: Develop or Refine and Implement a Pre-Visit Planning Process for more.
 

2. Empower rooming staff to engage patients in the decision to do the preventive care activity.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Director or care team lead.

Aim to screen for depression, anxiety and unhealthy substance use during all acute visits, and make space to limit the number of screenings based on how sick an individual is feeling and their capacity to engage.

Screenings, especially behavioral health screenings, require rooming staff to read the room to decide whether to go ahead with the screening. Consider that screenings can lengthen a visit and/or raise topics that patients may not be prepared to tackle when feeling unwell. Care team leaders can empower rooming staff to offer screenings and to express the importance of patients’ own priorities, especially if patients feel limited by their time or are feeling too unwell to complete screenings.

KEY ACTIVITY #7:

Use Care Gap Reports or Registries to Identify All Patients Eligible and Due for Behavioral Health Screening and Follow-Up


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; implement condition-specific registries; address social needs.

Overview

This key activity provides detailed guidance on how to reliably and efficiently develop and use a regularly updated list of all patients eligible for recommended or standard screenings or interventions (e.g., behavioral health screening and documentation of follow-up) through a care gap report or registry. Note that this activity focuses on behavioral health services, but many other preventive and maintenance services are needed to provide comprehensive preventive care. See the Pre-Visit Planning: Leveraging the Team to Identify and Address Gaps in Care resource for a more complete list.

Care gaps are gaps between the recommended care that a patient should receive according to clinical guidelines and protocols and the care a patient has actually received. Most EHRs already have a module that identifies what services are due for each patient, including behavioral health screens.

Rather than put the responsibility for searching through charts or remembering which patients need further preventive care or follow-up on the individual care team member, this activity provides guidance for how the practice can efficiently leverage electronic health records (EHRs) for all its patients.

Care gap reports are essential for practices to understand and continually improve consistency and reliability for screening for behavioral health needs. At the care team level, care gap reports focus on gaps for patients assigned to your care team and help your team understand which patients you are responsible for. These lists can be used to:

  • Support improvements to the pre-visit planning process, develop standing orders, and improve other routine clinical workflows designed to systematically identify and address gaps in care.
  • Prioritize patients for whom care teams should provide proactive inreach and reminders for engaging in care.
  • Support quality improvement efforts with an equity lens.

In integrated care teams, care gap reports can be especially helpful in supporting the team to leverage all patient encounters toward reducing care gaps. For example, when a patient is seen by a behavioral health specialist and the care gaps report indicates missing chronic care screens or interventions, the behavioral health specialist can connect the patient to the medical assistant to ensure that chronic care activities are initiated.

Actively identifying and acting on care gaps ensures all eligible patients assigned to your practice receive timely screenings and other preventive services. This reduces the burden on the healthcare system by preventing more severe health issues in the future. Furthermore, reducing missed or delayed diagnoses using care gap reports during pre-visit planning is important to support reliable integration of behavioral health screenings into primary care, which can help to identify and address issues early. Early identification of depression or anxiety can prompt further exploration of the impact of these needs and begin to explore the relationship of behavioral health and chronic disease management, including how behavioral health needs may complicate patients’ engagement in preventative care and chronic disease management.

Many practice patients experience barriers in accessing care due to structural and historical racism, homophobia, xenophobia, and other biases that have historically disadvantaged individuals and groups from receiving equitable services. Defining clear criteria and gaps for patients due for specific screenings or preventive services helps to illuminate groups that have not had historically had equitable access and combats biases by standardizing expectations for who is due for what care, providing a starting point for ensuring reliable and equitable access.

Mental health disorders, such as depression, continue to be underdiagnosed among patients of color. Research suggests that African American Medicare patients have a significantly lower rate of screening and treatment than non-Hispanic white patients.[25] Staff can identify potential barriers to patients accessing and engaging in care by using enhanced care gap reports to filter and display the data alongside demographics, social needs, behavioral health needs, and communication preferences. This information can be used to promote a person-centered approach across the care journey, from conducting inreach in the patient’s preferred language to co-creating the care plan, supporting their engagement in community-based care provision, and fostering self-care behaviors.

Furthermore, care gap reports that segment the data into cohorts based on demographics and other personal information may help the team identify inequities in care, access and outcomes, which can inform improvement efforts.

Care gap reports can be used during pre-visit planning to identify people for whom social needs screening has not yet been completed. This creates an opportunity to identify unmet social health needs and connect patients with resources that address their social needs.

Many EHRs already have a module that identifies what services are due for each patient, while others do not. Where this functionality is available, it may not be configurable to align with the health center’s specific protocol or be able to incorporate outside data. Other options for developing registries include supplemental applications, population health platforms, and freestanding customized databases that draw data from the EHR and other sources.

Care gap reports may be embedded in electronic health records or made available through other technology channels and are useful both at the individual patient level and aggregated to identify groups of patients to facilitate population-level management through registries. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

A registry can be thought of as a list of patients sharing specific characteristics for tracking and management. Both care gap reports and registries should have the capacity to segment patients by age, gender, race and ethnicity, and language.

Other relevant HIT capabilities to support or relate to this activity include care guidelines, care dashboards and reports, quality reports, inreach and engagement, and care management and care coordination.

Access to outside data may be a consideration (e.g., data from other practices) as services received outside the practice may be part of compliance. While claims data may be helpful in this regard, lag time may impact its usefulness. Patient-facing applications should be strongly considered to assure they are informed and appreciative of the nature and importance of recommended care. In California, many healthcare organizations are required or have chosen to participate the in California Data Exchange Framework (DxF), which can facilitate data sharing between clinics, MCPs and other partners.

FIGURE 5: EXAMPLE CARE GAP REPORT FOR AN INDIVIDUAL PATIENT

Example Care Gap Report For An Individual Patient

 

FIGURE 6: EXAMPLE CARE GAP REPORT AT THE POPULATION LEVEL

Example Care Gap Report At The Population Level

Action steps and roles

1. Plan the care gap report.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager or data analyst. If it is not clear how the report can be produced, this step may involve one or more people from the practice who work on the EHR and, possibly, the EHR vendor.

As a team, decide what screenings or treatment guidelines are appropriate for your population of focus and prioritize the most important care gaps to run reports on. Start with the core and supplemental measures and any process measures your practice is tracking, and consider if there are any other gaps, clinical guidelines or measures your practice feels important to prioritize.

Identify the inclusion criteria for each report, such as age, any exclusion criteria, and factors that make someone high risk.

Care gap reports should include, at a minimum, for patients 12 years and older:

  • Patients with an absence of a depression screen using a validated tool within the past year. For patients previously diagnosed with depression, the care gap report can also indicate that they are due for a repeat PHQ-9 to monitor their symptoms. A smaller time interval between PHQ-9 administration may be set by the practice for patients who have a depression diagnosis.
  • For HEDIS compliance, ensure that a gap report is available to identify patients who screened positive for depression but have no documented follow-up care within 30 days. See the PHMI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Key Medi-Cal Populations of Focus for more information defining follow-up.
  • Practices also use gap reports to track follow-up in patients who screened positive for depression and are not showing remission within six months, as they may require additional follow-up.

 

2. Build the report.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Data analyst.

Determine whether the EHR has an existing report or one that can be modified to fit the inclusion criteria. You should talk to staff who are familiar with the electronic record; in some cases, it may be necessary to consult with the EHR vendor to confirm this information and how to run the report.

The care gap format should include:

  • Criteria for inclusion in the report.
  • The overall compliance rate for the care gap being measured.
  • All patients eligible for the screening and their addresses and phone numbers.
  • The last date the screening was performed and any follow-up recommendations or next steps.
  • Preferred method of communication (e.g., phone, email, text).

Reports should be able to display and/or disaggregate the data based on:

  • Race, ethnicity and language (REAL) as well as sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI).
  • Any known social or behavioral needs.
  • Communication preferences or other preferences that would inform the screening modalities offered, such as documented declination of prior screenings.
  • Data on any other characteristic, including insurance data, that could pose a barrier to completing screening.

 

3. Standardize the data format.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager or data analyst.

Standardizing the data format and where it is entered is critical to ensuring accuracy in the resultant report. Once you know that a report can be produced, understand the specific data elements that are needed to produce the reports.

Document how each data element must be entered into the EHR in order to populate the fields needed for reporting. In some cases, data on completion of screening must be entered by hand. Doing this will require a decision on the part of the practice as a whole and may require staff training and reinforcement on an ongoing basis. Where issues or apparent confusion are identified, regular discussion at team huddles or staff meetings will help in maintaining a standard approach.

Tip: Assign responsibility for the initial review of the reports to confirm data integrity.

4. Develop workflows to support improved patient screening and preventive care completion rates.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager, care team.

At the patient level, ensure that the care gap report can be used for or linked with reminders or alerts for clinicians as well as for sending reminders to patients who are due for screening.

Depending on communication preferences that have been expressed by patients, the patient care gap report may be exported to an automated reminder system that can trigger reminders by phone, text, email or postal mail.

In addition, as part of the practice’s pre-planning process, patient care gaps should be reviewed and flagged as part of the daily huddle. See Key Activity 8: Develop or Refine and Implement a Pre-Visit Planning Process for more details.

5. Develop a process for review of gaps at the population level.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager.

Set a report frequency to review care gap reports at regular care team meetings or huddles in order to develop a plan for improvement at the population level. See Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus for more.

6. Monitor the care gap report for accuracy and completeness.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager or data analyst.

It is critical to have bidirectional feedback with the practice’s care team about any real or potential errors in the care gap report, such as:

  • Errors in how the data is entered, compared to what is required under the new standardized data format.
  • Patients who are eligible for and due for screening who are missing from the report.
  • Patients who have recently been screened who are still listed as due for a screening.

Errors should be investigated through a chart review. If errors in the report specifications are discovered, the care gap report or process for producing the report should be modified. If the issue is incorrect documentation, staff training and reinforcement of documentation standards will be required.

Additional consideration for sustainability: Ensure there is an internal process for updating the criteria included in the EHR for care gap reports as clinical guidelines change.

KEY ACTIVITY #8:

Develop or Refine and Implement a Pre-Visit Planning Process


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction; care coordination; address social needs; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This activity provides guidance for how the care team can effectively and efficiently embed behavioral health screenings and considerations into the practice’s pre-visit planning process (PVP). Pre-visit planning is typically driven by the medical assistant with help from other care team members and includes steps taken:

  • Prior to a scheduled appointment, to scrub the chart and identify any pre-visit tasks per the pre-visit checklist.
  • The day of an appointment, during the daily huddle and before the patient sees the PCP.
  • At the end of the current visit to ensure the patient understands any actions they need to take and to schedule for any follow-up.

The average medical visit at California practices lasts just 15 to 20 minutes, and many patients come to these visits with multiple needs. Pre-visit planning works towards optimizing a team-based approach outside of these short primary care visits so patients receive comprehensive care in alignment with the latest clinical guidelines and their own preferences. Pre-visit planning is an important tool for the integrated care team to leverage all of its relationships and touch points with the patient to close gaps in care. For example, if a patient arrives at the practice for a grief counseling visit with the behavioral health specialist and the pre-visit planning summary indicates gaps in chronic care, the behavioral health specialist provides grief counseling and links the patient to the medical assistant, who then uses a standing order to provide necessary screens (e.g., foot check, etc.).

Pre-visit planning allows for better coordination of care. This can be particularly beneficial for patients with complex health needs, ensuring they receive comprehensive and equitable care. As your practice works to reduce any identified equity gaps, pre-visit planning is often a powerful activity for ensuring culturally relevant care as the care team partners with the patient to discuss follow-up actions.

The PVP should incorporate your practice’s process for screening and responding to social needs, including checking whether social needs screening is due. When social needs are identified, the team should be clear on the pathways, both during and after visits, to address and follow up on those need

Pre-visit planning draws upon similar technical enablers as care gap reporting and likewise can be facilitated at the individual patient level and at the level of groups of patients coming for care by a specific team in an appointment schedule block. The format in which planning is done needs to consider the workflow and staffing model.

Relevant HIT capabilities to support this activity include care guidelines, registries, clinical decision support, care Dashboards and reports, outreach and engagement, and care management and care coordination. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Individual patient-level pre-visit planning would be optimally enabled within the EHR, provided the EHR can store relevant information, such as assessments, plans, orders and notes outside a visit note. Pre-visit planning might also include the use of patient-facing applications, such as portal reminders, questionnaires, and self-completed screenings and assessments, which would ideally be available to the clinician and care team in the EHR.

Engagement of the expanded care team in pre-visit planning requires access by all relevant members of the care team to contribute to and view relevant information. This may require coordination with technology additional to the EHR, such as care coordination and population management applications where relevant information might be stored.

Huddle reports, in which individual patient information can be visualized in summary views across all patients within a session, can require use of technology outside the EHR, but might also be supported by developing reports populated by data from the EHR. Ideally, internal practice or EHR data should be supplemented with external data where such information completes the patient’s current status. If such electronic access is not possible, the workflow should include manual reconciliation by history from the patient.

Action steps and roles

The steps below are specific to the integration of behavioral health approaches at different steps in the PVP. Note that behavioral health is only one of many other preventive and maintenance services that can be planned for during PVP; the resource: Pre-Visit Planning: Leveraging the Team to Identify and Address Gaps in Care provides a more complete list. In general, PVP activities should include BH activities, such as depression, anxiety and unhealthy substance use screening.
 

1. Prior to a visit.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical assistant and/or BH staff.

The medical assistant determines whether a patient is due for any BH screenings or would be best served by rescreening before the indicated time frame.

Examples include:

  • Identifying that a patient is due for universal depression screening with the PHQ-2.
  • Identifying that a patient has an active diagnosis of depression and has not had a repeat PHQ-9 for more than12 months and, therefore, it would be appropriate to administer the PHQ-9 rather than the PHQ-2.
  • Considering whether the screen should be administered in a different form, such as in a language other than English or adolescent-specific language.

Figure 7 provides an example of how your EHR might be able to support flagging any patient overdue for depression screening.
 

FIGURE 7: PRE-VISIT PLANNING REPORT DETAILING OVERDUE DEPRESSION SCREENING

Pre Visit Planning Report Detailing Overdue Depression Screening

2. During the daily huddle.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: All team members, MAs or BH staff.

Identify patient-specific ways to tailor care delivery, including:

  • Whether there need to be deviations from the typical screening flows to best serve the patient's needs.
  • Whether the patient may benefit from an introduction or warm handoff to the behavioral health staff. If yes, note any necessary alterations to schedules to facilitate a real-time introduction to the BH staff.

 

3. Post visit.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical assistants or BH staff.

Medical assistants or BH specialists establish and follow a process for checking BH screens to ensure that they were scored. The BH specialist initiates and documents appropriate and necessary follow-up.

Implementation tips

Teams that are farther along the behavioral health integration care continuum often develop methods to:

  • Include BH staff in morning huddles, even though it requires creative scheduling. This may require shifting huddles to the end of the session or the end of the day to prepare for the next day.
  • Make BH staff aware of clinical care gaps. While BH staff are not dispatched to complete medical screens or order missing tests, they can be another source of support and coordination for the team to help ensure that the patient completes such tasks (e.g., screening for smoking cessation or encouraging a patient to complete their Cologuard screening).

KEY ACTIVITY #9:

Adopt Universal Screening of All Adults for a Range of Behavioral Health Needs


KEY ACTIVITY #9A:

Screen Adults for Depression, Including Suicidality


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This activity provides guidance on screening for depression for adults (those greater than 18 years, though this age cut-off may be site-determined).

Major depressive disorder (MDD), a common mental disorder in the U.S., can have a substantial impact on the lives of affected individuals and their families. If left untreated, MDD often interferes with daily functioning and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, exacerbation of comorbid conditions, or increased mortality. In 2021, 8.3% (21 million) of adults in the U.S. experienced at least one major depressive episode and 5.73% (14.5 million) experienced a major depressive episode with severe impairment.[26] Depression can be a chronic condition characterized by periods of remission and recurrence, often beginning in adolescence or early adulthood. However, full recovery may occur.

Depression is common in postpartum and pregnant people and affects both the parent and infant. Depression during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and small for gestational age (SGA).[27] Postpartum depression may interfere with parent-infant bonding. See the PHMI Children Guide for specifics about screening for postpartum depression in a pediatric setting.

Psychiatric disorders and previous suicide attempts increase the risk of suicide. Depression screening must include plans for responding to patient statements regarding suicidal ideation. See Key Activity 9B. Implement Suicide Risk Assessment and Response Protocol.

There is overwhelming evidence of racial and ethnic inequities in depression treatment and outcomes. Racism and structural policies have contributed to wealth inequities in the U.S., which affect mental health services in underserved communities. Black and Hispanic or Latino/a white patients.[28][29] A cohort study of more than 50,000 primary care patients in California showed that the implementation of a standardized depression screening process may reduce inequities in screening and improve recognition and appropriate treatment of depression for all patients.[30] Implementation of systematic depression screening for all patients is one approach to more equitable delivery of depression treatment in primary care.

Research suggests that, for those reporting unmet social need, there is an association with higher rates of depression.[31][32] Consequently, depression should be considered a comorbidity when social needs are screened for, and both areas of potential need and support should be considered when designing appropriate interventions. See Key Activity 10: Develop a Social Needs Screening Process that Informs Patient Treatment Plans for more.

Technology can support screening for behavioral health conditions by delivering structured guidelines, protocols, and clinical decision support to care team members responsible for carrying out assessments. It can also help by incorporating standardized screening tools into EHRs and care management and care coordination applications. These screening tools can also be made available directly to patients through patient outreach and screening technologies.

Understanding the prevalence of behavioral health conditions assists in program and resource development to track their impact on health outcomes and to incorporate behavioral health conditions into risk stratification. Health information technologies used to track referrals are also important in care management.

Action steps and roles

Many brief tools have been developed that screen for depression and are appropriate for use in primary care. All positive screening results should lead to additional assessments to confirm the diagnosis, determine symptom severity, and identify comorbid psychological problems.

The use of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 is recommended and recognized as the most commonly used tools for assessing adults for depression. In addition to being a clinically validated tool for use in person, over the phone, and via self-administration on a tablet or computer, these questionnaires been translated into multiple languages other than English (e.g., translations of PHQ and General Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) screeners are provided at PHQScreeners.com). As your skills evolve, there are considerations for using tools that are more specific to particular populations. Commonly used population-specific depression screening instruments include the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in various forms in adults and adolescents, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in older adults, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in postpartum. You can also start by reviewing current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Recommendations for Depression and Suicide Risk in Adults: Screening.

The following action steps are relevant, regardless of the screening tool chosen. Given that screening workflows may vary based on the clinic setting, teams are encouraged to modify and adapt this process as needed, depending on if the process starts when a patient presents at registration or when a patient is roomed (in-person or virtually).

 

1. Patient presents for medical care.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care coordinator or MA.

Staff identifies prior to the visit that the patient is due for routine depression screening. Routinely screen for depression at every medical visit.

 

2. Care team member administers the depression screening to the patient and identifies the next step in following the intended process for responding to positive screening results.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Rooming staff.

Teams should decide upon the appropriate cut-off (e.g., greater than zero) that would result in a referral or next level of care or treatment.

  • If the result is negative, return to the routine screening interval.
  • If the score is positive, then rooming staff hands off information to the medical or behavioral health staff.

Many teams approach universal depression screening by utilizing a two- to four-question tool (e.g., the PHQ-2). If the PHQ-2 is positive (e.g., in response to either question the patient has a positive response), there is a workflow or standardized process that directs staff to administer the PHQ-9.

As stated above, screens are not a replacement for assessment.

 

3. If PHQ9 results are greater than zero or the agreed upon cutoff for initiating the next level of care, talk with the patient about appropriate timing of the best next steps for follow-up.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical provider with possible handoff to the BH team.

Next steps might include:

  • Watchful waiting;
  • BH referral; and/or
  • Medication management, including a combination of the above.

 

4. If suicide risk is identified, immediate follow-up is initiated based on the acuity of symptoms established by the healthcare team (see suicide protocol).

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical and/or BH provider.

 

5. Plan for regular follow-up, such as annual repeat screening.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical and/or BH provider.

Teams collectively should decide upon appropriate intervals for screening for depression and follow-up activities. Suggested intervals are:

  • Adults who screen negative will be screened annually.
  • Adults who have minimal symptoms and opt for watchful waiting will be readministered the PHQ-9 in three to six months.
  • Adults who have significant depression and move to assessment will be readministered the PHQ-9 in three months.

For those who are not being screened annually, such as those with depression who may be screened more frequently, determine the mechanism by which this alternative to the schedule will be followed and whether rooming staff or behavioral health staff will do the assessment. For example, this may include alterations to the care gap module in the EHR or utilization of another reminder system.

Note that, for those previously diagnosed with depression, teams annually monitor symptoms and the possibility of remission with the PHQ-9 as a means of monitoring ongoing care and treatment. Though the same tool is used for screening and monitoring, note that it is being used for a different purpose and the decision to administer it arises from different clinical workflows.

Consider narrowing intervals for repeating the PHQ-9 for those with a previous positive screen, diagnosis of depression or living with chronic conditions, such as every six months.

Implementation tips

  • Care teams may administer depression screening in various ways: Verbally by rooming staff, by paper screener at check-in, virtually through tablets at check-in, or as part of a pre-visit screening packet sent via text or email. Regardless of the method, care teams must have a process for reviewing the results in a timely fashion on the day of the visit and initiating the next step in the workflow.
  • An example workflow for depression screening is provided in the guide Creating a Workflow for Depression Screens & Follow Up Treatment from Colorado Access. 
  • Consider alternatives and modifications to the workflow for those patients whose primary language is not English.
  • Outside of those rooming and providing medical care/management, consider who else should be involved in the patient’s depression care. This might include community health workers, community-based organizations, support groups, and peers. Community health workers can be incorporated into care team planning and huddles and must be made aware of positive screens so that they can align needed supports.

KEY ACTIVITY #9B:

Implement Suicide Risk Assessment and Response Protocol


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This key activity outlines considerations for implementing a suicide risk assessment plan or protocol to respond to patient reports of suicidal ideation. This activity focuses on a protocol for patients aged 18 and over.

Suicide is a leading cause of death in U.S. adults, accounting for over 48,000 deaths in 2021. Rates of suicide attempts and deaths vary by sex, age, and race and ethnicity. Primary care providers are in a unique position to prevent suicide. Research suggests that people who die by suicide are more likely to have seen their primary care provider shortly before their death than any other healthcare professional.[33]

Question nine of the PHQ-9 asks, “In the last two weeks, have you had] thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself?” Suicide risk assessment protocol development aids teams in preparing to appropriately respond to positive responses to this screening. Clinicians and healthcare teams may worry about their ability to respond to such complaints in the primary care setting and may suggest this as a reason for not consistently implementing depression screening.

Additionally, suicide risk assessment training and education may improve the quality of care and utilization of services across the healthcare system by training staff to identify the appropriate level of care for patients who present with a psychiatric emergency, such as the need for crisis services.

Veterans, tribal or indigenous populations, LGBTQ+ youth, and people with disabilities are at greater risk for death from suicide due to historical discrimination.[34] In addition, adults in rural areas have the greatest rates of death and those employed in certain occupations and industries, such as construction, mining, or oil and gas extraction, may be at higher risk.[35] A systematic approach to screening all patients may increase the rates that individuals will be engaged in care and may decrease the secrecy and shame that surround this topic.

Considering the different ways that patients and their families may express suicidal concerns is a person-centered response. For all patients, clear messaging and response to thoughts of suicide may decrease feelings of shame or secrecy and contribute to lowering the rate of death by suicide.

Technology can support screening for behavioral health conditions by delivering structured guidelines, protocols, and clinical decision support to care team members responsible for carrying out assessments. It can also help by incorporating standardized screening tools into EHRs and care management and care coordination applications. These screening tools can also be made available directly to patients through patient outreach and screening technologies.

Understanding the prevalence of behavioral health conditions assists in program and resource development to track impact on health outcomes and to incorporate into risk stratification. Health information technologies used to track referrals are also important in care management.

Action steps and roles

1. Develop a workflow for suicidal ideation.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Designated IBH implementation team member.

The risk of suicide can surface in many ways, including the systematic administration of a mental health screen, including a "Yes" response to item nine in the PHQ-9 or other screening tool, individual patient reports of suicidal ideation during a visit or over the phone, or reports by concerned family members or friends. The workflow should account for the possibility of any staff member (e.g., clinical, reception, security) encountering a patient with suicidal ideation.

Depending on the size of the practice, practices should identify two or three individual staff members who can provide immediate follow-up and further assessment for any patient who raises suicidal ideation to serve as crises responders. Typically, this person is a behavioral health staff or medical provider. This may necessitate assigning a specific staff person each day to be accessible in a timely manner for more urgent warm handoffs. Staff will need to consider what this might look like in the setting of a virtual or hybrid BH team. The practice should also identify the local crisis response phone number that staff should call, if all three identified crises response staff are not available or on site.

A simple example workflow is provided below and pictured in Figure 8.

To respond to suicidal ideation that is expressed during a visit, either through screening or in discussion:

  • Screen for depression with the PHQ-9 (question nine). The tool may be administered by rooming staff, BH staff, or PCPs.
    • Ensure a clear workflow is in place for alerting the provider of a patient’s positive suicide screening question, in addition to the designated internal resource for responding to those reporting suicidal ideation.
    • Note that if a patient discloses suicidal ideation during the visit, it is likely that the PHQ-9 would be skipped or administered after the suicide risk assessment.
  • Implement a suicide risk assessment. Suicide assessment tools include:
  • Conduct a clinical evaluation of level of acuity.
  • Work with the patient to develop a management plan with appropriate referrals and/or follow-up.

In responding to suicidal ideation over the phone, the patient service staff member contacts the designated crisis responder in the practice who implements the workflow described in the steps above.

 

FIGURE 8: EXAMPLE WORKFLOW FOR RESPONDING TO SUICIDAL IDEATION

Phmi Respondingtosuicidalideation
 

2. Support staff in preparing for how to respond.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Designated IBH implementation team member.

Post a worksheet with recommendations of what to do if a patient presents with suicidal ideation and/or requires hospitalization for suicidal thoughts in a visible or accessible place for key office staff. The Suicide Prevention Resource Center offers a template that can be used for this purpose, which is linked in the resource list below. Learn and clearly list community-based resources, including contact information for:

  • Local crisis services.
  • Local emergency psychiatric services.
  • Transportations options for patients in crisis.

Consider running mock drills to support the staff’s comfort in responding to reports of suicidal ideation, especially for patient service representatives or triage staff who may receive calls related to this topic.
 

3. Conduct regular training for staff.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: BH provider or leader.

Conduct regular training for call centers, receptionists, MAs, and primary care providers on responding effectively to patient endorsement or disclosure of suicidal thoughts. While none of the processes described in this guide are simple, developing a smooth process around responding to urgent or crisis mental health situations is complex and may require practice and multiple iterations over time. Regular training can help make the process more familiar for staff and provide thoughtful responses to barriers or difficulties in implementing the process.

KEY ACTIVITY #9C:

Screen Adults for Anxiety


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This activity provides guidance on screening for anxiety for adults (e.g., those 18 and above, though this age cutoff may be site-determined).

Twenty years ago, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) introduced screening for depression for all adults and adolescents. In June of 2023, they added a recommendation (Grade B) to screen adults 18 to 64 years old for anxiety. Many practices choose to screen for generalized anxiety disorder.

Anxiety disorders are often unrecognized in primary care settings and patients with anxiety commonly experience yearslong delays in treatment initiation. Anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, phobias, selective mutism, and anxiety not otherwise specified.

Anxiety disorders typically begin in childhood and early adulthood, and symptoms often decline with age. Large population-based surveys estimate that 33.7% of the United States population is affected by an anxiety disorder during their lifetime.[36]

Research in the past 10 years provides evidence of inequities in mental health treatment for people of color, including restricted access to mental healthcare and suboptimal mental health treatment.[37] Some of these inequities arise as a consequence of unmet social needs, including socioeconomic status, educational attainment, housing status, access to health insurance, and exposure to toxic environments. Research throughout the pandemic shows that the disparity in treatment between white and patients of color increased.[38] The percentage of respondents with unmet mental healthcare needs in 2020 to 2021 suggest that more Black, Hispanic, and Asian respondents had unmet care needs in comparison to white respondents.

In addition to racial and ethnic disparities, there are differences in the prevalence of anxiety between genders. One of the most widely documented findings in psychiatric epidemiology is that women are significantly more likely than men to develop an anxiety disorder throughout their lifespan.[39]

Implementation of systematic anxiety screening for all patients is one approach to more equitable delivery of anxiety treatment in primary care.

Risk factors for common mental disorders are strongly associated with social inequalities, whereby the greater the inequality, the higher the inequality in risk.[40] Consequently, anxiety should be considered a comorbidity when social needs are screened for and vice versa, and patient needs in both areas should be considered when designing appropriate interventions. See Key Activity 10: Develop a Social Needs Screening Process that Informs Patient Treatment Plans for more.

Technology can support screening for behavioral health conditions by delivering structured guidelines, protocols, and clinical decision support to care team members responsible for carrying out assessments. It can also help by incorporating standardized screening tools into EHRs and care management and care coordination applications. These screening tools can also be made available directly to patients through patient outreach and screening technologies.

Understanding the prevalence of behavioral health conditions assists in program and resource development to track impact on health outcomes and to incorporate into risk stratification. Health information technologies used to track referrals are also important in care management.

Action steps and roles

1. Select a validated tool appropriate for the local context.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Representatives and leaders from medical and behavioral health teams, QI staff.

Most commonly, when screening for anxiety in adults, the GAD-7 is the most common tool. Additionally, there are tools that are specific to pregnant people and older adults.[41] At this time, we encourage integrated teams to choose and consistently use a validated tool with considerations for clinic setting, preferences, and populations served.
 

2. Decide frequency of tool administration and when screens will be conducted in the visit flow.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Representatives and leaders from medical and behavioral health teams, QI staff.
 

3. Interpret screening results within the clinical context for the patient with workflows for low, medium, and high acuity and determine next steps.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical and/or BH provider.

Next steps may include:

  • Watchful waiting.
  • Self-management.
  • BH referral.
  • Medication management, including a combination of the above.

 

4. Conduct training with all staff and providers to enhance the effectiveness of screening and assessment.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic director, CBHO, CMO.

Given that there is likely to be a high rate of positives in response to screening activities for anxiety, ensure training of the integrated team in distinguishing and appropriately responding to the range of disorders that may include symptoms of anxiety, such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, phobias, selective mutism, and anxiety not otherwise specified.

KEY ACTIVITY #9D:

Screen Adults for Unhealthy Substance Use


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

Annual universal screening for unhealthy substance use for adults aged 18 and above.

Alcohol and other drug use is one of the most common causes of preventable death, injuries, and disability in the United States; in 2017, more than 70,000 individuals died as a consequence of overdose. Serious health effects, such as overdose, arrhythmias, seizures, impairment while driving, difficulty with learning and memory impairment, greater risk of infections, and obstetric complications are associated with drug use and vary by drug type, administration mode, amount, frequency of use, and pregnancy status. In addition to serious health effects, unhealthy drug use is also associated with violence, criminal activity, incarceration, impaired school and work performance, interpersonal dysfunction, and social and legal problems.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Bright Futures all recommend universal annual screening for unhealthy substance use, including alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and opiates.

Note: The U.S. Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) have adopted the 2008 USPSTF recommendation indicating that evidence is insufficient to recommend routine screening for illicit drug use.[42] Concerns center on the potential harms of screening, including labeling, stigmatization, and medicolegal consequences. Finally, current treatment options are limited.

Due to implicit racial bias, in the absence of universal screening, minority populations are screened and found to be positive for unhealthy drug use at greater rates than white populations. This raises grave concerns for equitable outcomes, especially when considering the medicolegal consequences of positive screens.[43] Research suggests that, while all populations underutilize drug treatment, there are variable consequences of unhealthy substance use, such as the fact that Hispanic and African American men are more likely to die from cirrhosis than are white men.[44]

Universal screening for unhealthy substance use, when paired with referral to treatment, may result in support for the entire family system. As noted previously, unhealthy substance use is associated with physical, emotional and social consequences that potentially have ramifications for the family as a whole.

Technology can support screening for unhealthy substance use by delivering structured guidelines, protocols, and clinical decision support to care team members responsible for carrying out assessments. It can also help by incorporating standardized screening tools into EHRs and care management and care coordination applications. These screening tools can also be made available directly to patients through patient outreach and screening technologies.

Understanding the prevalence of behavioral health conditions assists in program and resource development to track impact on health outcomes and to incorporate into risk stratification. Health information technologies used to track referrals are also important in care management.

Action steps and roles

1. Review current recommendations.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Representatives and leaders from medical and behavioral health teams, QI staff.

 

2. Select a validated tool appropriate for the local context.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Representatives and leaders from medical and behavioral health teams, QI staff.

Currently, there is a lack of consensus about specific validated tools to use to screen for alcohol, marijuana and other drug use. While SAMHSA endorses using a combination of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and CAGE questionnaire tools, USPSTF encourages the use of a one- to three-item screener and suggests the AUDIT or Single Alcohol Screening Question (SASQ), with additional tools focusing on specific populations, such as pregnant people, older adults, children and adolescents. Recent evidence suggests that the SBIRT tool is effective at screening for unhealthy alcohol use, but there is an absence of evidence suggesting effectiveness for other nonmedical drug use.[45] At this time, we encourage integrated teams to choose and consistently use a validated tool with considerations for clinic setting, preferences and populations served.

3. Decide frequency of tool administration and when in the visit flow screens will be conducted.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Representatives and leaders from medical and behavioral health teams, QI staff.

4. Train staff in administering tools with workflows for low, medium and high acuity.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: QI leads, nursing or rooming staff.

As with any screening effort, it is appropriate for staff to ask permission before proceeding with screening and respect the patient’s preferences to forego screening at a given visit. This is most often done by the staff administering the screening (e.g., rooming staff, such as medical assistants, nursing staff, etc.) and is true for all screens. This is especially important in the area of substance use, where individuals may feel singled out or stigmatized.

5. Conduct training with all staff and providers to enhance the effectiveness of screening and assessment.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic director, CBHO, CMO.

There is a high degree of patient concealment about the use of alcohol and other drugs, likely due to societal stigma and a potential history of judgment from healthcare providers. Screening is only useful if patients feel comfortable answering honestly. Training all patient-facing staff on the medical field's history of harm to people with addictive disorders, education about addictive disorders, anti-stigma communication skills, and evidenced-based empathic communication is crucial for screening to be effective.

KEY ACTIVITY #10:

Develop a Social Needs Screening Process that Informs Patient Treatment Plans


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: address social needs.

Overview

This activity provides guidance on screening patients for health-related social needs and how the information can begin to be used to inform patient treatment plans, including referral to community-based services. Social needs are defined as individual material resources and psychosocial circumstances required for long-term physical and mental health and well-being, such as housing, food, clean water and air, sanitation, and social support.

Evidence continues to accumulate that demonstrates not only the ways in which social needs impact physical and mental health outcomes[46][47][48] but also how worsening physical and mental health conditions can impact social stability.[49][50] Unemployment and/or precarious employment conditions are routinely linked to increased psychological distress. Greater levels of homelessness, marital instability, economic insecurity, and incomplete schooling have been associated with worsening control of mental health diagnoses.[51]

Combining workflows for universal BH screening with screening for SDOH will provide some efficiency and also ensure that the care team is aware of various needs. Addressing behavioral health conditions, such as depression, can better equip patients to help them address social needs.

Screening for social needs provides an opportunity to ensure healthcare is provided in the context of life circumstances in which patients and their families are living – part of providing holistic, person-centered care.

Health equity is advanced by addressing the underlying issues that prevent people from being healthy. At the population level, this means addressing communitywide social drivers of health and structural determinants and, at the individual level, this means acknowledging and beginning to address health-related social needs.[52]

Social needs screening often asks questions about private and potentially stigmatized aspects of a patient’s life (e.g., poverty, intimate partner violence).[53] See below about screening for and responding to social needs in a trauma-informed way. Be aware that staff may also experience trauma when screening for social needs (e.g., if a staff person has a history of food insecurity or experiencing homelessness in the past) and have a plan to support staff needs.

Note that there is not yet consensus or uniform endorsement regarding screening for social needs, due at least in part to a lack of high-quality evidence on the risks, benefits, and best practices of screening and response.[54] For example, findings from the recent CMS Accountable Health Communities Model indicate that social needs screening and navigation services reduced ED utilization and may have reduced expenditures but did not appear to increase patients’ connection to community services or resolve patients’ social needs.[55] Other possible ways social needs screening can support attending to social needs include strengthening the patient-provider relationship,[56] destigmatizing social services, tailoring care, and, at a population level, increasing social investment.[57]

Technology-enabled screening can be utilized to screen patients for social needs through various channels: Directly in the EHR, in applications used by care coordinators, and directly to patients via patient-facing inreach and engagement technologies. Practices will need to determine a process to assure that externally generated screening information be incorporated into the patient record and used for care delivery, risk assessment, and management and for managing relevant referrals. Social health information exchanges exist in some communities to identify where patients are getting social services and help identify higher risk patients; these will develop over time.

Action steps and roles

1. Pick a validated standardized screening instrument and establish how to document results.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinical leadership.

Pick a standardized screening tool that fits your organizational environment and the context of your patient population. The Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network (SIREN) conducted a review of social needs screening tools and provides a comparison and search tool for different tools for adults and children. Currently available standardized tools you might consider include:

Work with your clinical informatics team to determine how staff will document screening results in your EHR. Some EHR systems have screening tools already embedded and many are moving quickly to incorporate screening; some EHRs may be able to auto-populate Z codes based on screening results. Your managed care plans may offer additional guidance or support and can be a resource to connect your practice to other organizations that have experience with screening instruments and technology tools. By using the same screening tools and/or information technology platforms, the consistency and quality of care delivery can be enhanced.

For the patient’s problem list, DHCS provides a list of 25 Priority Social Determinant of Health (SDOH) Codes to focus on. This shorter list of codes is intended to capture areas where the health system may have the greatest impact on identifying and addressing social needs.

2. Understand resources and community referrals for positive screens.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Referral manager, community health workers.

Through CalAIM, the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has taken steps to ensure that Medi-Cal patients have access to social support that can impact health outcomes. Connect with your managed care plan(s) (MCPs) and regional area consortia to understand what services and resources they have in place to support patient access to community-based social services. Many MCPs are developing relationships with social services agencies to meet the needs of their patients.

For Medi-Cal patients with the highest level of social needs, MCPs offer Enhanced Care Management (see Key Activity 20. Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions) and some or all of 14 CalAIM Community Supports: these provide resources to address social needs, such as housing transition navigation, recuperative care post hospitalization, and sobering centers. Some MCPs use the new CalAssist tool for Medi-Cal patients to self-identify whether they are eligible for any of the 14 CalAIM Community Supports and generate a referral to the applicable community support service.

Many patients will screen positive for social needs and will benefit from connection to alternative resources that are not part of Community Supports. Contact your MCP to see if they have established relationships with providers that connect individuals to social services. Health plans may contract with an online provider or with a social services network lead entity that can connect you with existing community-based organizations and public agencies in the area. These contracted services will often include a process for making closed loop referrals, where the referring provider is notified if the patient has successfully accessed the referral. Closed loop referrals are a best practice in care coordination that lead to higher levels of patient and provider satisfaction.[58]

Key services to catalog include nutrition assistance, employment readiness, childcare support, postpartum paid family leave, rent and utility assistance, and resources for transportation. Other places to look to build sources for local community referrals include:

  • Your current social work staff and/or community health workers, who may have many go-to resources already identified.
  • Free online aggregators for local community services in California, such as findhelp.org, a free telephone number providing access to local community services for housing, utility, food, and employment assistance.
  • Resource networks maintained by a local hospital or larger health system in your area.

For going deeper in this area, practices can consider prioritizing quality improvement activities that establish new or previously underutilized community resources to address specific social needs as part of your systematic approach to decrease inequities. Case studies provided in the resources linked below provide examples of these improvement initiatives.

3. Establish a workflow for screening and referrals.

Consider screening before the patient meets with the PCP and have a workflow in place for follow-up of positive screen (e.g., meet with care coordinator or care management staff who will facilitate referral). Take steps to flag the positive screen so the care team is aware and can address any positive screens during the visit.

Train staff in the new workflows and how to provide trauma-informed screening. Staff often initially resist screening if they feel they don’t have the tools to help address positive screens.

  • Following screening, ask patients for their prioritized needs and whether they would like assistance before making a referral.
  • Providing a written script for staff and accompanying signage can build confidence in dealing with the challenging circumstances that many patients experience.

 

4. Provide person-centered care that acknowledges social needs.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: PCPs and the expanded care team.

Information about a patient’s social needs can be used to provide tailored, person-centered care and treatment plans that patients are more likely to follow. For example, if a patient screens positive for transportation insecurity, this would affect their ability to come in for in-person behavioral health follow-up. Honor the patient’s decisions, including whether and how they choose to address their social needs. See Key Activity 13: Optimize Patient Engagement and Activation for more on co-creating treatment goals with patients, providing self-management support, and using communication techniques, such as motivational interviewing. See resource: Trauma-Informed Population Health Management.

The desires and goals of the patient will inform how and when to move ahead in addressing social needs. It is important to support patients through motivational interviewing and trauma-informed practices to create a person-centered care plan. Having processes in place to support ongoing person-centered care planning, such as a warm handoff to a care coordinator or a documented plan to follow up on specific needs at the next visit, will help to build trust and support a patient’s successful connection to community referrals when they are ready.

Examples of how this activity has been implemented

Rogue Community Health Center in Medford, Oregon, recognized the need to implement screening for health-related social needs. They also recognized that the lack of interoperability of health information flow was a barrier to collaboration in their community. As a result, they served as a convener and backbone partner, pulling together a group of community-based organizations and public health entities into a “no wrong door” model for screening of social needs. The partnership was called the Rogue Challenge and resulted in a shared community database where patients could be screened at multiple data entry points and the life cycle of a positive screen and referral could be tracked to ensure that people with positive screens were connected to community resources and completed their referrals. Together, the collaborating partners selected an appropriate validated social needs screening tool and adapted it to their context. Next, the team tested screening workflows, including the ability to access information and provide additional screens. This approach expanded the capacity of community-based organizations to administer social health screening, which provided the health center with information in advance of a clinic visit. In their value-based care environment, it had the added benefit of identifying new patients not connected to primary care and connecting them to the health center, thus growing their population of capitation patients.

Implementation tips

Start by identifying the most common social needs (e.g., food, housing, income insecurity) and for each need work to map out an end-to-end process from identification to resolution. Practice coaches can be resources in this process of mapping, which can include the following:

  • Selection of screening tool.
  • Capture of data within the tool (e.g., Z codes for social needs for future tracking and reporting).
  • Development of a referral pathway, including responsible individuals and agencies).
  • Defining success and resolution.
  • Ongoing periodic follow-up.

Seek input from patients, families, clinic staff and referral entities as you develop your process.

KEY ACTIVITY #11:

Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; implement condition-specific registries; proactive patient outreach and engagement; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction; care coordination; behavioral health integration; address social needs.

Overview

This activity provides guidance for a systematic evidence-based approach for identifying and then reducing inequities for people with behavioral health conditions. It focuses on the first primary driver in PHMI’s Equity Framework and Approach: Reduce inequities for populations of focus.

 

FIGURE 9: PHMI EQUITY DRIVER DIAGRAM

Phmi Equitydriverdiagram

Your practice likely achieves better outcomes with certain populations or subpopulations and worse outcomes with others. Nationally, Black and Hispanic or Latino/awhite patients.[59][60] Reasons for such inequities are likely multifactorial and include factors such as socioeconomic status, experiences of structural and overt racism, family structure, neighborhood effects, and childhood adversity.[61] Some hypothesize that lower engagement with mental health services, combined with adverse childhood experiences, result in high levels of unmet need.[62][63] Social and cultural factors that serve as barriers to accessing care are generally most acute among persons of color, immigrants, persons speaking a primary language other than English, and people with historically stigmatized conditions, such as chronic pain and addictive disorders. As we work to reduce and, over time, eliminate inequitable health outcomes, we need to understand what contributes to these different outcomes as well as factors that do not contribute to them.

This includes recognizing that race is a social construct determined by society’s perception. While some conditions are more common among people of certain heritage, inequities in conditions, such as cancer, diabetes, and adverse maternal outcomes, have no genetic basis. While genetics do not play a role in these inequitable outcomes, the extent to which inequities in the quality of care received by people of color contribute to inequitable health outcomes has been extensively documented.[64] These inequities are often a direct result of racism, particularly institutionalized racism – that is, the differential access to the goods, services, and opportunities of a society by race.[65] Racial health inequities are evidence that the social categories of race and ethnicity have biological consequences due to the impact of racism and social inequality on people’s health.[66] It is also critical to recognize that we have policies, systems and procedures that unintentionally cause inequitable outcomes for racial, ethnic, language and other minorities, in spite of our genuine intentions to provide equitable care and produce equitable health outcomes.

Improving your practice’s key outcomes for behavioral health requires a systematic approach to identifying equity gaps (e.g., who your practice is not yet achieving equitable outcomes for) and then using quality improvement (QI), co-design, systems thinking, and related methods to reduce these equity gaps. This effort will be more effective if it is guided by a theory of change that addresses the ways in which structural and institutional racism lead to inequities in care provision. For more discussion, read resources such as this one on how structural and institutional racism has a negative impact on mental health.

Identifying and meeting patients’ social health needs is a key driver of reducing inequitable health outcomes. We provide additional guidance in this activity on how to both reduce inequities and meet patients’ social health needs.

Access to the data required to identify and monitor inequities, as outlined in the actions below, is fundamental to this activity.
Relevant HIT capabilities to support this activity include care guidelines, registries, clinical decision support (e.g., modifications required to consider disparate groups), care dashboards and reports, quality reports, inreach and engagement, and care management and care coordination. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

EHRs can capture basic underlying socioeconomic, sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), and social needs-related data but may, in some cases, lack granularity or nuances that may be important for subpopulations. Mismatches between how UDS captures REAL data, versus how EHRs capture or MCPs report data, can also create challenges. This may require using workarounds to capture these details. It is also important to ensure that other applications in use that may have separate patient registration processes are aligned. Furthermore, tracking inequities in accessing services not provided by the health center may also require attention to data sources or applications outside the EHR.

Health centers should also be alert to the potential for technology as a contributor to inequities. For example, patient access to telehealth services from your practice may be limited by the inequitable distribution of broadband networks and patient financial resources (e.g., for phones, tablets, and cellular data plans).

Language, literacy levels, technology access, and technology literacy should also be considered and assessed against the populations served at the health center.

Action steps and roles

1. Build the data infrastructure needed to accurately collect REAL, SOGI, social needs and other demographic data.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Data analyst.

  • Race, ethnicity and language (REAL).
  • Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI).

The PHMI Data Quality and Reporting Guide provides guidance and several resources for collecting this information. According to this guide, the initial step in addressing inequities is to collect high-quality data that fosters a comprehensive understanding of each patient. This entails incorporating REAL data, demographic data (e.g., age, gender), and social needs data. By leveraging this information, healthcare practices can gain valuable insights into differences in access, continuity and health outcomes." Steps two to four below provide more information on this process.

Collecting REAL information allows practices to identify and measure inequities in care while also ensuring that practices are able to interact successfully with patients. This is done by understanding their unique culture and language preferences.[67] KHA Quality has a toolbox that assists with REAL data collection.

The Uniform Data System (UDS) Health Center Data Reporting Requirements (2023 Manual) provides detailed guidance on REAL and SOGI. Note: While UDS does not currently require that practices report on the specific primary language of each patient, practices should make an effort to identify and record each patient’s primary language due to UDS reporting still requiring languages other than English to be reported.

Accurate collection of data requires appropriate fields and options in the EHR and other employed technologies, as well as appropriate human workflows in collecting the data. Staff responsible for data collection should be continuously trained and assessed for best practices in data collection, including the promotion of patient self-report.
In addition, practices should work to ensure that patients understand the importance and use of this information to help them feel comfortable supporting its collection. High rates of “undetermined” or "declined” in these fields may be indicative of the need to attend to these staff training needs.

Collecting this data is important, especially to obtain a complete picture of health for patients who identify as transgender. By understanding the needs of patients more fully, providers can make more informed decisions for the best treatment of their patients. The World Professional Association for Transgender health (WPATH) has provided further guidance regarding standards of care related to gender diversity.
 

2. Use the practice’s electronic health record (EHR) and/or population health management tool to understand inequitable health outcomes at your practice by stratifying your data.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Data analyst.

This includes reviewing your care gap report or care registry and being able to stratify all of the following:

  • Core measures for the population of focus.
  • Supplemental measures for the population of focus.
  • Process measures for the population of focus.

Stratify this data by:

  • Race, ethnicity and language (REAL).
  • Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI).
  • Other factors that can help identify subpopulations in need of focused intervention to reduce an equity gap (e.g., immigrants, people experiencing homelessness, literacy levels, etc.).

This is not a one-time event but rather a continuous process (see step 13 below) and should be done in tandem with step three below.
Each practice should define the frequency of review and use of their registry to stratify data for adult preventive care. In early use, the stratified data will support the identification of areas of inequity and allow for prioritization of interventions.

See also the Key Activity 7: Use Care Gap Reports or Registries to Identify All Patients Eligible and Due for Behavioral Health Screening and Follow-Up.
 

3. Screen patients for social needs.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

Key Activity 10: Develop a Social Needs Screening Process that Informs Patient Treatment Plans provides guidance on screening patients for health-related social needs and how the information can begin to be used to inform patient treatment plans, including referral to community-based services.

This is not a one-time event but rather a continuous process and should be done in tandem with step two above.
 

4. Analyze the stratified data from steps two and three to identify patterns in inequitable outcomes within the population of focus.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Data analyst.

This includes:

  • Utilizing tools to visualize and understand differences across different populations or subpopulations.
  • Exploring trends, patterns and significant differences to understand which demographic groups will require a focused effort to close equity gaps.

This is not a one-time event but rather a continuous process (see step 13 below) and should be done in tandem with step two above and step four below.

Periodic review of the stratified data will provide insight into improvements in inequities and/or the emergence of new areas of disparity.
 

5. Conduct a root cause analysis for each population (e.g., demographic group) that the practice does not yet have equitable outcomes for.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Multidisciplinary team.

Select root cause analysis approaches that work best for the equity gap you are closing:

  • Engage and gather information from patients affected by the health outcome in your root cause analysis (see step six).
  • Brainstorming.
  • Systems thinking (e.g., understanding how interconnected social, economic, cultural, and healthcare access factors may be impacting the health outcome).
  • Tools that rank root causes by their impact and the feasibility of addressing them (e.g., prioritization matrix and/or an impact effort matrix).
  • Visual mapping of root causes and effects (e.g., fishbone diagram).
  • Perform focused investigations into selected root causes, gathering qualitative data through interviews, surveys or focus groups with the subpopulation of focus.

Present the findings to a broader group of stakeholders to validate the identified root causes and gain additional insights. Incorporate their feedback and refine the analysis, as needed.
 

6. Partner with patients to develop additional insights that will help you develop successful strategies.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team and people with lived experience (e.g., patients representative of the population(s) of focus).

Using one or more human-centered design methods, such as focus groups, 7- Stories, Journeymapping, etc. (see links to these methods below), work with patients of each population of focus to better understand:

  • Their assets, needs and preferences, as they relate to adult prevention recommendations.
  • Cultural beliefs, including traditional healing practices that may impact their understanding of or willingness to engage in certain adult prevention practices.
  • Beliefs and level of trust in healthcare generally and in the topic of focus specifically (e.g., cancer screening, immunizations, behavioral health, etc.).
  • Barriers to accessing care, including health insurance, transportation, childcare, housing access and other social factors.
  • Barriers to remaining engaged in care, including the above-noted barriers and including cultural beliefs, trust, and concerns about follow-up requirements.
  • Trusted sources of information and communication mechanisms and preferences for this population.
  • Their ideas for improving health outcomes as they relate to the uptake of preventive care.

The patients you partner with for this and other steps in this activity may be part of a formal or informal patient group and/or identified and engaged specifically for this equity work.
 

7. Identify key activities that address or partially address the identified equity gaps.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

Based upon the insights your practice has developed for a population of focus and your root cause analysis, determine which of the key activities in this implementation guide could address or partially address the equity gap.

Most of the key activities in this guide either explicitly address an equity challenge or can be adapted to better address an equity challenge. Examples of activities that can be adapted to reduce identified equity gaps include but are not limited to:

 

8. Develop new strategies/ideas to address the identified equity gaps.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team and people with lived experience.

If one or more of your root causes cannot be addressed fully through any of the key activities in this guide, use one or more human-centered design methods (see resources below) to develop ideas to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities among this population.

Developing these ideas is best done with representatives of the population of focus, as they have expertise and experience that may be missing from the practice’s care team. In an effort to generate dozens of potentially viable ideas during this brainstorm, develop potential strategies without immediate judgment of the ideas.

Selected resources on human-centered design and co-design:

 

9. Determine which strategies to test first.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team and people with lived experience.

Steps seven and eight above help your practice identify existing key activities and generate new ideas. Your practice likely doesn’t have the bandwidth to test all of them, at least not at the same time, so now is the time to prioritize a few to begin testing.
There are many ways to prioritize ideas. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement often recommends a prioritization matrix and/or an impact effort matrix.

If you have organized your key activities and new ideas into themes or categories, you may choose to work on one category or select one to two ideas per category to work on.

The number of key activities and/or new ideas that you prioritize for testing first should be based on the team’s bandwidth to engage in testing. It is critical to determine the bandwidth for the team(s) that will be doing the testing so that you can determine how many ideas to test first.
 

10. Use quality improvement (QI) methods to begin testing your prioritized key activities and new ideas.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team and people with lived experience.

Nearly all the key activities and all of your new ideas will require some degree of adaptation for use within your practice and to be culturally relevant and appropriate to your population(s) of focus.

Use plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, as feasible, generally starting as small as feasible. Think “ones” (e.g., one clinician, one hour, one patient, etc.) and become larger as your degree of belief in the intervention grows.

Whenever testing an activity or new idea, we recommend that the practice:

  • Use PDSA cycles to test your ideas and bring them to scale. See more information on PDSAs below in the tips and resources section.
  • Generally, start with smaller scale tests (e.g., test with one patient, for one afternoon, in a mailing to 10 patients, etc.). Use Figure 10 below in the tips and resources section to help you decide what size test is most appropriate.

Develop or refine your learning and measurement system for the ideas you are testing. A simple, yet robust learning and measurement system will help you know if your ideas are having their intended effect, if they are having unintended secondary effects (e.g., staff burnout), and how the overall implementation process is going. Consider the following:

  • What core measures, supplemental measures and/or process measures is this intervention designed to improve equity for?
  • What are or will be the first or early indications that the intervention or idea is working?
  • How will you know how the implementation itself is going from a patient perspective, a staff perspective, and a management perspective?
  • What are some balancing measures to monitor, including those for the implementation itself and those related to spending time and resources on implementation?
  • Study the successes and challenges of the test. When feasible, this should include getting feedback from patients directly after testing a new idea with them and incorporating their feedback into your next test.
  • Refining the idea, as needed, based on the test.
  • Testing again and increasing the scale of the test as these tests result in fewer challenges and better results.

By working out the inevitable kinks in the idea you are testing before taking it to full scale, the practice will make the idea work better for patients and less frustrating to the care team. Testing and refining also can eliminate the workarounds that occur when a process or approach doesn’t fit well into the system or workflow it is being placed into.

Select resources on quality improvement (QI):

 

11. Implement – bring to full scale and sustain – those practices that have proven effective.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

Once an idea has been well tested and shown to be effective, it is time for your practice to hardwire the idea, approach or practice into your daily work. Consider using the MOCHA implementation planning worksheet to think through:

  • Measurement.
  • Ownership.
  • Communication, including training.
  • Hardwiring the practice.
  • Assessment of workload.

Sometimes, implementation may require that you update your protocol and/or policies and procedures for the populations of focus.
 

12. Once you have tested, refined and scaled up the initially prioritized ideas, begin testing other ideas.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team and people with lived experience.

This might include going back to the ideas developed previously but not prioritized and/or going back through the testing steps above to develop and prioritize new ideas, potentially for additional populations of focus.
 

13. Put in place formal and informal feedback loops with patients and the care team.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

Establishing formal and informal feedback loops regarding new processes will ensure that your practice’s ideas are meeting the needs of patients and are reducing identified equity gaps. These feedback loops also ensure the changes are feasible and sustainable for your practice.

For patients, feedback loops could be created using many of the human-centered design tools used to design your improvement activity (e.g., surveys, interviews, focus groups).
Consider establishing a standing funded patient advisory board that is available to design, implement and evaluate all of your practice’s improvement activities.

For the care team, feedback loops might include:

  • Existing or new staff satisfaction/feedback mechanisms.
  • Regularly scheduled meetings/calls to get staff feedback on processes, methods and tools.

 

14. Continually analyze your data to determine if your efforts are closing equity gaps.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

This includes regular (at least monthly) review of the stratified measures for all of the following:

  • Core measures for the population of focus.
  • Supplemental measures for the population of focus.
  • Process measures for the population of focus.
  • Social needs data.
  • Any additional measures collected as part of your testing and refinement effort.

Share the data with patients to both show your work to decrease known equity gaps and to solicit ideas for closing them.

Implementation tips

In integrated behavioral health settings, it is especially important that quality improvement is an effort of the integrated team with the express involvement of behavioral health clinicians and community health workers.

When testing an idea for change (either a key activity or new idea) for your practice to address a known equity gap, the size of your test scope or group is critical. We recommend starting with a very small test (e.g., with one patient or with one clinician) or a small test (e.g., with all patients seen during a three--hour period by this clinician) unless you are certain the change idea, activity or test will lead to improvement with little or no adaptation for your practice, the cost of a failed test is extremely low, and staff are excited to test the change idea. As you learn from each test what is and isn’t working, you can conduct larger scale tests and tests under a variety of conditions. While at first glance this would appear to slow down the implementation effort, starting small and working out the kinks as you progressively work to full scale actually saves time and resources and is much less frustrating for your patients and care team. Figure 10 provides guidance on how big your test should be.

FIGURE 10: HOW BIG SHOULD MY TEST BE?

How Big should my test be

KEY ACTIVITY #12:

Manage Treatment of Behavioral Health in Integrated, Evidence-Based and Person-Centered Ways


KEY ACTIVITY #12A:

Foster Collaborative Teamwork with a Focus on Power Sharing Among Disciplines


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: behavioral health integration.

Overview

A commitment to integrated behavioral health includes a biopsychosocial orientation to patient care. Moving away from the biomedical model of care necessitates new ways of working that equally value psychological health and wellness. Staffing and care team structures should reflect this orientation to whole-person care with power sharing between professions. Optimizing participation of all care team members through effective power sharing provides the basis of truly integrated care.

Integrated behavioral health provides crucial behavioral health support in the primary care setting, effectively multiplying access to behavioral healthcare. Barriers to achieving integrated behavioral health include: competing health needs of historically marginalized populations (e.g., mental health is a secondary concern when treating children with HIV); severe shortages of licensed BH providers, especially a lack of congruent therapists for patients of color and non-English-speaking patients; comorbidities; factors related to medical culture (e.g., transactional vs. relational care); and organizational issues (e.g., frequent staff turnover). This activity cannot address those factors external to the health center but offers practical steps to mitigate organizational barriers to integration.

Behavioral health integration is fundamentally about intentionally building and supporting an integrated care team whose collective experiences represent a greater diversity of knowledge and expertise to support patient care.

The use of tools, such as messaging platforms, support team communication and warm handoffs, and thus collaboration. Pre-visit planning provides an opportunity to strategize across the care team to engage patients with behavioral health needs. Organizational vetting of clinical guidelines and protocols support a unified approach to patient care.

Understanding the prevalence of behavioral health conditions assists in program and resource development to track the impact on health outcomes.

Action steps and roles

1. Center integration methods that foster power sharing among the integrated care team.

This may look like:

  • A behavioral health lead representative on the senior leadership team, ultimately leading to a position that has parity with the CMO.
  • BH and medical clinicians regularly and actively exchange information about patient care through one-on-one conversations, curbside consults, etc.
  • Training activities held annually, semi-annually or more frequently include BH and medical clinicians together.
  • Regular multidisciplinary team huddles.

For additional recommendations regarding strategies for promoting a culture of IBH and operational integration, see Key Activity 2: Enhance the culture of Integrated Behavioral Healthcare and Key Activity 3: Enhance Operational Integration of Behavioral Health.
 

2. Design for workspace arrangement and infrastructure.

  • For BH and medical clinician's physical workspace, consider opportunities for the BH staff to be embedded in or proximate to healthcare teams, allowing for greater frequency of warm handoffs, curbside consultations, etc. See Figure 2 in this article for a visual representation.
  • Ensure BH staff and clinicians have treatment rooms consistent with evidence-based care guidelines.
  • If care team members are working in a hybrid model, plan and develop a culture that additionally makes time for teaming across virtual and on-site staff.
  • Document shared treatment plans in a single medical record.

Implementation tips

  • Consider identifying shared goals among the care team (e.g., standing up a medication-assisted treatment (MAT) program) with the integrated team as a facilitator of the shared goal.
  • Look for continual opportunities to champion and spread the story of the value of IBH. Consider patient stories as well as staff reflections on how their experiences working in an integrated team have enriched and supported their professional lives.

Evidence base for this activity

Grazier KL, Smith JE, Song J, Smiley ML. Integration of Depression and Primary Care. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 2013 Jun 3;5(1):67–73.

Mullin DJ, Hargreaves L, Auxier A, Brennhofer SA, Hitt JR, Kessler RS, et al. Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services. Health Services Research. 2019 Feb 6.

KEY ACTIVITY #12B:

Embed Evidence-Based Care Practices


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: behavioral health integration.

Overview

The activity encompasses a large group of actions composing evidence-based care practices for supporting patients with behavioral health needs. Evidence-based care practices include the following singularly or in combination:

  • Trauma-informed care practices.
  • Psychopharmacology.
  • Behavioral health services, including SUD.
  • Peer support.
  • Supporting self-management.
  • Referral to community mental health services.

This collection of practices has been adapted and modified to better meet the needs of patients and families presenting in primary care and leverage the skills of an integrated care team.

Care must be available to patients with behavioral health needs in primary care, the setting in which they are most likely to seek care.

Tailoring care delivery to the cultural, social, gender, and other sociodemographic contexts of individuals results in better patient outcomes. Behavioral health services that are clinically proven effective, equitable, and culturally appropriate have a greater potential to benefit individuals and communities. Resources for adapting evidence-based practices to different populations are provided below, and additional resources about culturally appropriate care are described in Key Activity 6: Expand Access to Integrated Care.

There is ample evidence to support a trauma-informed orientation to behavioral healthcare in primary care. Trauma-informed practices include an understanding of trauma and an awareness of the impact it can have across settings, services and populations. Trauma-informed practices involve approaching trauma through an ecological and cultural lens and recognizing the significance that context plays in how individuals perceive and process traumatic events.[68]

Relevant HIT capabilities – ideally, embedded into the EHR – to support this activity include behavioral healthcare guidelines and related clinical decision support, . The ability to develop a treatment plan that is viewable by all members of the care team provides them with the opportunity to support the planned care. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps and roles

A generic workflow for the required elements of evidence-based practices that should be embedded into your practice is described below.

1. Patient with behavioral health needs is identified through screening, presentation in primary care, or presentation in the inpatient setting.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Rooming staff, medical or BH staff, care manager or care coordinator.

Note that screening is not the same as assessment. All positive screening results should lead to additional assessments to confirm the diagnosis, determine symptom severity, and identify comorbid psychological problems.

2. Patient undergoes evaluation of mental health and unhealthy substance use, including determination of level of care needed.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: BH specialist or PCP.

Tip: Consider developing a visit type that is a level of care assessment. This is an opportunity for BH to take more time to assess the patient’s needs and preferences, integrating patient-specific information with available resources in the community mental health system. BH specialists bring expertise in self-management and patient-motivated goal setting, and their knowledge of existing community resources allows identification of the best resource or organizational match for a patient’s needs at a given time.

3. Patient and care team decide on treatment plan and goals.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: BH specialist or PCP.

The treatment plan may include one or a combination of the following:

  • Psychopharmacology.
  • Behavioral health interventions, such as problem-solving therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal counseling, behavioral activation, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), motivational interviewing, person-centered therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and stepped care (defined below).
  • Peer support.
  • Self-management.
  • Referral to a higher level of care (e.g., community mental health services or specialty substance use disorder treatment).

Given the limited resources at your facility, your team will need to identify how to best integrate these practices into existing operations and workflows. The Maryland Primary Care Program: Behavioral Health Integration provides example workflows and questions for consideration for your practice to decide this.

Stepped care is an increasingly common care delivery model utilized across a variety of settings to manage demand and aligns the least intensive and intrusive interventions to individuals with less acute needs. Through regular assessment and monitoring, individuals are “stepped up” or “stepped down” to differing levels of interventions, as needed, based on changes in symptom severity or functional impairment. Primary care teams may adapt the stepped care model to most effectively respond to the range and volume of presenting needs.

As patients need a greater level of psychiatric care than can be provided in the health center setting, practices should refer and connect them with county-level mental health plan services. See Key Activity 20: Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions.

4. Routine monitoring of patient’s BH needs at the interval previously agreed upon by the care team and patient and family.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

5. Adjust care plan based on level of acuity.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Care team.

Evidence base for this activity

M. Kwan B, B. Valeras A, Brown Levey S, E. Nease D, E. Talen M. An Evidence Roadmap for Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health under the Affordable Care Act. AIMS Public Health. 2015;2(4):691–717.

KEY ACTIVITY #12C:

Embed Develop and Implement Standing Orders


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction.

Overview

A standing order is a preapproved provider order to perform a specific intervention for any patient who meets the criteria for the order and is used when the step in the workflow specifically requires the order of a qualified provider. Like protocols or standardized workflows, standing orders can help maintain consistent and systematic practices by clearly describing what team member is best suited to perform which important clinical activities. The following section offers guidance on how to use this suite of tools – protocols, standardized workflows, and standing orders – to make behavioral health screening a reliable part of care.

Standing orders describe the action to be taken and identify who on the care team is authorized to complete the order. Standing orders are designed to enable care team members other than the primary care provider (PCP) to initiate specific clinical actions to provide timely screening and care as long as specific criteria are met.

Implementing standing orders for BH treatment could support integrated care teams to provide holistic, effective and potentially lifesaving care to every patient who experiences a behavioral health crisis. The most common mental health crises are opiate overdose and suicidal ideation.

Examples of behavioral health standing orders could include:

  • Any positive screens on BH-related screening tools, such as a patient endorsing suicidal ideation during routine screening.
  • Next steps for any patient who asks for BH services.
  • Naloxone administration to patients experiencing an opiate overdose.

While a standardized workflow around universal behavioral health screening does not necessitate a standing order, in practice the distinction between a standing order and a protocol can mean different things to different teams, so there are instances where practices find it useful to create standing orders for behavioral health screenings as a way to support the care team to provide evidence-based care.

Standing orders and other standardized workflows, in concert with other key activities, allow care team members to work to the full scope of their license and provide scaffolding to support care team members as they work to greater autonomy. They promote workflow efficiency and effectiveness by standardizing who gets what care while freeing up time for the prescribing clinician.

Standardized workflows help promote equity by ensuring that every patient who meets the criteria for an intervention under the standing order is provided with appropriate services, limiting variation that could occur in interpersonal encounters. Care team members must train and practice their response to ensure that individual biases do not prevent them from taking action when time is of the essence. Leveraging standardized workflows as an opportunity to train and practice responding to mental health crises may diminish the discomfort that many of us feel when faced with patient disclosures of sensitive topics, including suicide or drug overuse.

Most EHRs can enable the creation of order sets that can be used to create standing orders. Order sets are particularly effective for managing a group of standard adult screening orders for a population. See Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions for more details on implementing order sets in a commercial EHR. Depending upon the health center’s workflows, these order sets can be placed on the chart by providers or can be drawn down by responsible designated staff according to protocols.

Relevant HIT capabilities to support this activity include electronic access to care guidelines, registries, care gap reports, and clinical decision support. The effectiveness of standing orders can be tracked through registries and care quality reports.

Action steps and roles

The table below outlines the actions and steps required to create standing orders and is adapted from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Center for Excellence in Primary Care.[69]

1. Review and understand the latest clinical guidelines and your practice’s already established workflows.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Quality improvement lead and panel manager, data analyst or medical director or equivalent.

See the latest guidelines for depression screening here: USPSTF Depression and Suicide Risk in Adults: Screening.

Develop and implement standardized workflows for behavioral health screening. At a minimum, this includes using the PHQ-2 with a standing order for completion of the PHQ-9, based on the results and suicide risk assessment. Other appropriate screenings should be determined by the practice. Many clinics use standardized workflows for SBIRT screening and follow-up.
 

2. Translate the appropriate clinical guidelines into a standing order or workflow.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager or data analyst.

The standing order or standardized workflow will follow the relevant clinical guidelines and be updated whenever clinical guidelines are updated. It will generally allow the following:

  • Medical assistants or community health workers with proper training may initiate the agreed-upon next steps when patients meet criteria when there isn’t a concern that requires the PCP’s involvement.
  • This may include initiating a referral, leveraging needed care team members, or notifying the PCP or behavioral health staff of the need for further evaluation.

See the example workflow in this article by the American Family of Physicians for opioid-associated emergencies, which details when naloxone should be considered and given.

For a standing order to be valid and in effect, it must be approved by clinical leadership at the practice, signed by a designated valid signatory (e.g., CBHO or CMO), and dated, and it must include the effective date for the standing order. Practices should consider including an expiration date and flagging this date in their system to help ensure that the standing order or workflow is reviewed and updated regularly. As the clinical guidelines change or other components are updated, the workflow should be signed and dated again by the appropriate party with an effective date for the revision.
 

3. Train the practice’s staff on the workflow and include this training in clinical onboarding of new staff.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Medical director or equivalent.

The practice’s staff should receive training in the use of standing orders and other standardized clinical pathways. Include any additional materials related to the workflow, such as patient education or instructional materials and nuances that the care team will need to understand.

Training should be provided at least annually, retraining should be provided before the effective date of any revisions to the work, and training should be part of the orientation for all new members of the practice care team.

The process of implementing updated workflows for BH treatment are opportunities to train and educate staff in how best to respond to both potential and unexpected situations, including responding to reports of suicidal ideation and other mental health crises and identifying and responding to opioid overdose. Training creates opportunities for open dialogues around topics that are associated with taboos and fears, such as suicide and drug use.

4. Assess and institute mechanisms to ensure the effectiveness and safety of the standing order.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinical director or equivalent or their designee.

It is likely that one or more aspects of the standardized workflow will not work as planned. For example, the practice’s workflow may not fully support the standing order, the wording may be confusing to one or more staff members, or it may not be regularly followed exactly (e.g., staff are using workarounds). Look out for these and other common challenges, and revise and update the workflow as needed to ensure that it works for the practice and meets all applicable regulations and guidelines.

Implementation tips

Common pitfalls of standing orders:

  • Standing orders are not updated when screening guidelines are revised and reflect an outdated practice. The remedy is to assign the task of updating the protocols to a member of the team who is responsible for at least annual review and modification.
  • New staff are not instructed on the clinical protocols. The remedy is to include review of standing orders as a core element of orientation for all roles named in the standing order.
  • A workflow includes the signature of a clinician who is no longer with the practice. The remedy is to workflow orders at least annually as well as any time a clinician responsible for setting the standing order has changed roles.

KEY ACTIVITY #13:

Optimize Patient Engagement and Activation


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; proactive patient outreach and engagement; care coordination; behavioral health integration; address social needs.

Overview

This activity focuses on partnering with patients to foster engagement in care and health-promoting behaviors. Person-centered engagement methods are founded in the dignity of each individual to make their own decisions and the dual recognition that care goals are more likely to hold meaning when they are aligned with a person’s life goals and health outcomes are shaped by everyday behaviors. This activity includes shared decision-making, self-management support activities, and leveraging technology and other approaches to increase self-efficacy.

Patient activation supports patients to engage in behavioral healthcare and to positively shape the myriad daily behaviors that impact their health. Even with adequate and integrated capacity to care for behavioral health needs, much of the work of patient recovery happens outside of the clinic. The motivation and ability of individual patients to engage in care and make positive changes are essential to their treatment and recovery from an ongoing behavioral health condition.

Evidence increasingly supports self-management strategies for those living with mental illness.[70] As with chronic illness self-management, self-management support for mental health aims for the patient to develop skills to co-design and adhere to the action plan, regularly monitor changes in symptoms, adopt healthy life habits, communicate effectively with health professionals and their support network, and limit situations that can trigger new episodes. The underpinning of self-management support is the value of the dignity of choice, including a watchful waiting approach, making space for patients who opt out of treatment in such a way that they understand that they are welcome to reengage when they are ready.

Co-designing patient activation approaches to ensure that they are tailored to patient preferences, needs and assets can support people who had previously felt disconnected to the practice’s services to engage in care. Self-management supports for patients and their families are an essential part of a patient-first orientation to care that incorporates the realities of their lived experience.

Likewise, engaging patients of diverse communities in focus groups or patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) to co-develop messages and communication strategies can help to ensure the needs and preferences of specific communities of focus are communicated with sensitivity.

Developing workflows and clinical content within the EHR to support self-management goal setting and follow-up are foundational to this effort. In addition, the ability to develop a shared care plan affords all members of the care team the opportunity to support patient activation.

Care team communication tools, such as messaging apps, allow for engagement across the care team to support collaboration.

Action steps and roles

1. Cultivate a trusting and engaging environment where patients feel comfortable in accessing care.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Leadership with IBH team.

A variety of ongoing training and skill development will support the care team in providing a welcoming environment to all patients:

  • Everyone in the practice has a role in welcoming patients into care, so the full complement of staff needs to be trained in trauma-informed principles of care. See the resource: Trauma-Informed Population Health Management.
  • Implement cultural humility training to address biases and promote equitable care. More about this is provided in Key Activity 6: Expand Access to Integrated Care.
  • Care team staff should also have training in self-management support and motivational interviewing (see below).

Displaying posters, pamphlets and other materials in the waiting room is an effective way to provide health education,[71] elicit patient engagement with behavioral healthcare, and assure patients of nonjudgement. Additionally, staff can wear lanyard buttons or badge stickers with messages, such as We ask because we care, to normalize universal screening. Some resources to consider:

Consumer advisory boards are a wonderful resource and can be effective partners to surface potential change ideas to enhance the practice’s welcoming nature, for example, by accomplishing clinic walk-throughs designed to look for opportunities to boost the welcoming nature of the physical space and limit negative experiences. For going deeper in developing an environment for supporting patient activation, consider sponsoring peer groups and group visits to foster peer engagement and support.
 

2. Train the care team in key self-management support skills.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Leadership.

Some key self-management support techniques include the ask-tell-ask communication technique, motivational interviewing, person-centered goal-setting,[72] and the therapeutic alliance.

Resources for developing self-management support skills include:

 

3. Develop team-based approaches to foster patient engagement and self-management.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic leadership, clinical champion.

In some practices, a social worker is trained to conduct the more time-intensive initial goal setting, and senior clinicians will review progress on patient goals during the visit. In other practices, peer support specialists or upskilled community health workers or medical assistants may provide behavioral health support. Your practice may decide to focus self-management in one patient subpopulation, and this will influence who is best suited to complete the tasks.

Regardless of your design, it will be important to establish clinic visit workflows that coordinate self-management support interactions that take full advantage of the skills of all members of the care team, technology, and other resources available to patients.

Tip: Case-rounding is integral to a team-based approach for supporting patient engagement. It is a mechanism to enable the team to have a shared understanding of patients’ action plans and can support care teams to collaborate around patient care.
 

4. Employ interview techniques that support partnering with patients, including identifying self-management goals that align with their preferences and building on their coping strategies.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Integrated care team.

Below are steps for providing self-management support around a shared care plan modeled on the OARS approach common in motivational interviewing:[73]

  • Ask open-ended questions: Ask broad questions that allow patients the maximum flexibility to respond without fear of a right or wrong answer. It can be as simple as, “What's been going on with you since we last met?”
  • Offer affirmations: Celebrate patients’ accomplishments and offer empathy for their struggles.
  • Practice reflective listening: When practicing reflective listening, patients are able to express their thoughts and then that information, if shared back with them with the purpose of eliciting conversation, helps them arrive at an idea for change.
  • Summarize the conversation: Recap what the patient has said, calling attention to the salient elements of the discussion, and allow the patient to correct any misunderstandings and add anything that was missed.

 

5. Leverage technology to support and document the development of a shared care plan.

Many EHRs have a module that supports the documentation of a shared care plan template. In the absence of using this type of module, patient self-management plans can be typed into the office visit summary and shared at the end of the visit.

Create a vetted list of condition-specific online or print resources that can be shared with patients of different ages and levels of health literacy. Some resources to start with:

  • NIMH provides self-care resources around managing stress, anxiety, and when to seek professional health.
  • Resources and posters linked in step one above.

For going deeper in this area, consider how telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, wearables, and new potentially artificial intelligence (AI) tools might supplement patients’ self-management ability. Consider both the health center’s capabilities and each patient’s ease with technology as well as whether the intervention is considered an emerging, promising or evidence-based practice. One such example of the use of technology is the Los Angeles County Office of Education (LACOE) partnership with K-12 public schools and health plans to offer a free third-party mental health telehealth service for students.

KEY ACTIVITY #14:


This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: proactive patient outreach and engagement; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction; care coordination; behavioral health integration; address social needs.

Overview

This activity will help you provide care that is person-centered and coordinated across all internal and external providers involved with the patient.

Care coordination involves deliberately organizing patient care activities and sharing information among all participants concerned with a patient’s care to achieve safer processes and more effective outcomes.

Care coordination is an integral part of providing high quality population-based care in an ambulatory care clinic. In your practice, care coordination happens daily as part of standard work and includes activities, such as assisting patients with referrals, managing patient messages, and receiving incoming information from outside care partners, including pharmacies, specialists, hospitals and community partners (e.g., schools, employers, community-based organizations). Behavioral health clinicians and staff should be an integral part of care coordination activities, as their skills and expertise are an asset in providing comprehensive and effective support to patients with complex medical needs.

Managing care across multiple settings is often a source of frustration and dissatisfaction for both patients and providers. Lack of coordinated care can result in both duplication of services and a lack of completion of needed services. When care is not coordinated, decisions can be made without a complete picture of the patient’s needs and goals. Knowing roles and responsibilities and working as part of a multidisciplinary team are foundational elements of providing integrated behavioral health and are complementary to the work of care coordination.

Practices that have effective care coordination processes often employ closed loop referrals as a best practice. In a closed loop referral, a referring provider can track the status of the referral (e.g., completed or pending) as well as the outcome of the referral, including whether additional follow up is needed. When closed loop referrals are implemented, both provider and patient satisfaction are enhanced.

There are four fundamental concepts when thinking about care coordination activities within your practice:

  • Accountability: A key to successful care coordination is accountability. Clinics and systems that excel at care coordination take ownership and assume responsibility for care coordination activities. Examples of care coordination processes include development of infrastructure for care coordination, identification of staff responsibilities, and relationship building with referral partners. Together, these actions create the ability to support referrals and transitions and track them to completion.
  • Patient support: Referrals and transitions often raise questions for patients and families and can be a source of anxiety. Not only do the logistics of a referral or transition create questions, but also patients and their families can experience anxiety regarding the outcome or purpose of a referral or transition. When a practice can dedicate staff time to addressing the needs of patients and families, referrals and transitions are most likely to accomplish intended goals.
  • Relationships and supports: Referrals and transitions work best when all parties – patients, primary care providers, and consultants – agree on the purpose and importance of the referral and the roles that each will play in providing care.
  • Connectivity: Building relationships and agreements among providers, including community agencies, lead to shared expectations for communication and care. Connectivity includes developing referral relationships, accepting accountability, and creating data flow.

In order to conceptualize how practices can coordinate with community-based agencies (housing, food, income support), hospitals and ERs, and specialists, refer to the visual depiction of the care coordination model by the Center for Accelerating Care Transformation (ACT Center).

Care coordination can benefit all patients in your practice and care coordination processes, such as closed loop referrals, can be applicable to many practice activities (see example considerations in Figure 12). Common areas where care coordination can be enhanced include specialty referrals and referral to social supports, such as transportation and housing needs. Care coordination activities can also identify patients who need a higher level of support through a care management program (see Key Activity 20: Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions). Care management differs from care coordination in that a patient consents to and works directly with a care manager to create a care plan that is shared with an extended care team. While a practice can decide whether it has the resources to provide higher level care management services, care coordination is a foundational activity of effective population health management.

Care coordination for Medi-Cal patients

Patients with Medi-Cal have access to many resources that can support improved health outcomes and social needs. These Medi-Cal resources can be another opportunity to create care coordination processes in your practice; see Figure 11 for a partial list of Medi-Cal programs that involve care coordination. As of 2023, both doula care and community health worker (CHW) services are benefits of the Medi-Cal program. Doulas provide evidence-based culturally competent (racial, ethnic, linguistic) services aimed at preventing perinatal complications and improving health outcomes for birthing. The services of CHWs (also known as Promotores/Community Health Resources) can be highly effective in helping to connect patients to resources and educational materials that are community-based and aligned with a patient’s values, language and cultural needs to further health equity. The California Health Care Foundation offers an overview of the CHW program, including potential hurdles.

Medi-Cal patients with high medical, behavioral health, and/or social needs may be eligible for Enhanced Care Management and Community Supports (see Key Activity 20: Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions for more information on these programs).

There are also a number of Medi-Cal programs that provide services and support to Medi-Cal patients who qualify. Care coordination between the practice and these programs can result in more integrated care for eligible patients. Some examples include:

  • California Children’s Services (CCS): Care coordination and support for eligible children with high levels of medical needs.
  • Long-term services and supports (LTSS): These are available to support individuals in the community and include skilled nursing facility services, personal care services, self-directed personal assistance services, in-home supportive services, and home- and community-based services.

FIGURE 11: EXAMPLES OF MEDI-CAL PROGRAMS OR BENEFITS THAT INVOLVE CARE COORDINATION

  • Enhanced Care Management
  • Community Supports
  • Community Health Workers
  • Doula
  • Long term services and supports (LTSS)
  • California Children’s Services (CCS)

Effective care coordination helps your practice to better meet the broad range of patients' needs and preferences. It helps ensure that each patient's needs and preferences are known and communicated at the right time to the right people and that this information is used to guide the delivery of safe, appropriate and effective care.

Key outcomes of care coordination:

  • Greater patient participation and satisfaction.
  • Closed gaps and addressed inequalities that exist in access to care.
  • Improved quality outcomes and the potential to leverage quality financial incentives.
  • Decreased staff burnout and duplication of services (e.g., “Let the system do the work”).

Effective care coordination helps to reduce health inequities among different populations by better identifying and then working to address a broad range of patients’ needs. By identifying outside clinical supports (e.g., hospital care, specialist care) and social supports (e.g., housing assistance, transportation, food insecurity, etc.) and creating pathways for coordination, the practice promotes equity by facilitating access to these services for all patients who need them.

As part of a care coordination strategy, practices should consider the growing number of aggregator organizations (see resources section below) that partner with community-based programs and resources centered around addressing social needs, such as housing, food and community. Many of these community-based programs are tailored for specific demographic groups and can support patients in meeting their needs in a culturally competent way.

Technology can be used to streamline and enhance care coordination. Care coordination technology tools can support care coordination activities, such as registry, clinical decision support, care gap reporting, and patient inreach and outreach engagement technology. See additional considerations under “Address Connectivity” below.

Practices can use a care coordination self-assessment tool, such as those referenced in the action steps below, to determine if additional technology support is needed.

Registry and care gap reporting
Practices can use an analytics platform to identify patients and group patients who have similar needs together. Your practice can then tailor interventions to meet the needs of a population. For example, a practice can use data to identify those people who have not had a visit in the past year or those who are due for colon cancer screening. Data can come directly from the medical records or from claims data that is submitted to the payor.

Care coordination software: Clinical decision support
Many EHRs have care coordination modules, which can be used to develop assessments and care plans. Alternatively, care coordination modules can be add-ons to EHRs. Care coordination software can support assessment, referral and coordination pathways (e.g., clinical decision-making support). Using a care coordination software module, a practice can develop an assessment with questions regarding a patient’s social health needs. If answers are positive, the software can be configured to provide referral pathways and prompt care coordination activities. For example, if a patient answers “Yes” to questions on food insecurity, the assessment can prompt referral to local resources, such as food banks, meal programs and nutritional supports. The system can also prompt the staff to reassess progress at the next visit.

For more information, see Appendix D: Guidance on Technological Interventions.

Action steps and roles

The action steps and roles outlined below provide a framework for assessing current state, developing a strategy, implementing care coordination, and monitoring and learning as you progress.

1. Establish a call to action for care coordination.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Behavioral health lead.
To achieve effective care coordination, staff need consider your practice needs to see itself as a hub or center for coordination of patient care.

  • While all providers within a patient’s support network need to collaborate, your practice should view itself as accountable for care coordination for empaneled patients and patients who have been assigned to your practice by their managed care plan.
  • Identify a care coordination team who will be responsible for leading the evaluation, assessment and implementation of care coordination activities.
  • Share with the care coordination team why care coordination is important.
  • Some areas to address:
    • What is care coordination?
    • Why does care coordination benefit staff and patients?
    • Review the proposed framework (e.g., assess, develop strategy, implement, monitor) to develop the care coordination activity.
    • Identify and share some initial projects directed at enhancing care coordination.
    • Invite and engage staff and patients to provide input on how they think care coordination can be enhanced.
    • Discuss how best to incorporate feedback from patients.
  • Use feedback from this activity and incorporate it into the assessment.

 

2. Assess your practice’s current state of care coordination activities.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: IBH implementation team, panel manager, QI lead, BH lead.

Analyze existing systems and processes:

  • Review existing care coordination protocols, technologies and resources utilized by health centers
  • Explore how technology is currently being used to support care coordination. Then, explore how technology could be harnessed to streamline care coordination, improve data sharing, and/or enhance communication among providers.
  • Review existing formal and informal linkage agreements.
  • Conduct an analysis to determine patient needs not yet fully addressed by existing agreements.
  • Assess data on patient outcomes, satisfaction, and any existing quality improvement initiatives.
  • The following resources can help your practice assess its current state:

 

3. Develop and implement a care coordination improvement strategy.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Panel manager and quality improvement lead.

Develop your high-level care coordination improvement strategy.

  • The high-level strategy is based on the results and insights from your care coordination assessment and your practice’s capacity or bandwidth.
  • Establish clear objectives.
  • Define specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound, inclusive and equitable (SMARTIE) goals for enhancing care coordination.
  • Ensure that these goals align with the overall mission and values of your practice.
  • Prioritize areas for improvement. Identify a limited set of key focus areas, such as communication protocols, technology integration, staff training, or patient engagement strategies, based on the assessment’s findings and your practice’s bandwidth.

Identify resources and infrastructure.

  • As part of the strategy’s implementation, identify the resources and infrastructure needed to support care coordination at your practice.
  • In Figure 12, we have included some considerations by resource as you develop your care coordination implementation plan. Note: some of the resources may not apply to your practice.

 

FIGURE 12: CONSIDERATIONS FOR IDENTIFYING CARE COORDINATION (CC) RESOURCES


Resource

Considerations

Staff

Dedicated time for the development, training and implementation of the CC activity.
Defining ongoing staffing needs.

Internal tools

Electronic health record modifications. Data needs and technology needed to implement the CC activity.

Process

Development of workflows, training materials, communication plan, and job descriptions. Identification of what CC activities will be the responsibility of the practice staff.

Funding and finance

Explore benefits, such as Enhanced Care Management or community health workers, as well as financial resources that may be available through external partners, such as health plans or hospitals.

Clinical decision-making support

Medical staff, behavioral health, and patients as subject matter experts (SMEs).

External support and data

Information and resources required from the entity with which the clinic is coordinating (e.g., hospital, specialist, social health clinician). Data exchange requirements including the new California Data Exchange Framework (DxF) on privacy.

Develop staffing for care coordination.

  • Determine who at your practice will be involved in care coordination.
  • The PHMI Care Teams and Workforce Guide provides an overview of care coordination using a care coordinator or referral manager.
  • Based on the population of focus and the intervention, develop staffing requirements and any job description changes to embed care coordination into your practice.
  • The responsibilities of a person or people fulfilling care coordination roles should include, at a minimum:
    • Manage the referral process.
    • Assist patients with transitions, such as those to and from hospitals and other institutions.
    • Help patients resolve logistical, financial and/or other barriers to a successful referral.
    • Link patients with community resources.
    • Link patients with peer support services.
    • Follow up with patients within a few days of an emergency room visit, hospital discharge, or discharge from a treatment facility.
    • Ensure the safe transfer of patient data.
    • Track progress (e.g., referral milestones).
    • Assist patients who are having difficulties.
    • Schedule follow-up and specialty appointments for and with patients.
  • Formalize this role through a job description or position description.
  • Provide regular training and support to the care coordinator, referral coordinator or similar.

Develop or refine your policies and procedures for care coordination. At a minimum, they should include all of the following:
Identifying patients who are eligible for care coordination.

  • Defining the activities that are associated with care coordination (e.g., inreach, engagement, assessment, desired outcome).
  • Managing the referral process.
  • Ensuring the safe transfer of patient data.
  • Tracking progress through closed loop referral (see referral milestones above).
  • Identifying patients who might benefit from higher levels of care coordination, such as care management interventions. More about care management is discussed in Key Activity 20: Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions.

Develop or refine your referral protocols.

  • Develop clear guidelines for when and how to make clinical referrals.
  • Include criteria for urgent vs. nonurgent referrals.
  • For each provider your practice will be referring to:
    • Identify the information, format and process the provider requires to receive a referral.
    • Share the information you will need back from the provider when the referral has been successfully made and/or once the service or support has been provided to ensure continuity of care and nonduplication of services.
    • Formalizing this through a written agreement or compact is a good way to ensure expectations on both sides of a referral are understood.
  • In working with community agencies or organizations that provide social support, the specific information that can and should be shared will depend on the service. It is important to have a mutual understanding about that information, using a written agreement, where possible. At minimum, if the referral did not include a warm handoff, there should be an expectation that the practice hears back from the organization to let them know whether the patient followed up on the referral. Sample primary care checklist suggestions for assessing referral process.

Address connectivity. For any providers that you are exchanging patient data with, your practice should develop formal agreements and processes. Here are some considerations to facilitate information sharing among providers involved in an individual’s care:

  • Integrate documentation platforms, where possible, and standardize how documentation is included in patients’ records.
  • Ensure that behavioral health records are integrated into the overall EHR system to the extent permitted by law.
  • Enable providers to access comprehensive patient information.
  • Identify and assess participation in health information exchanges and/or social health informatione.
  • Exchange systems, where feasible, to facilitate seamless sharing of patient information. These exist in some communities and will develop over time. This explainer series from the California Health Care Foundation describes the new statewide health information exchange coming into effect in 2024.
  • Understand when patient consent is required to ensure compliance with privacy regulations, such as HIPAA. Include consent processes in the referral protocols.
  • Set expectations about the information that should be shared and develop processes for facilitating that exchange. As data that is used in a clinical setting will likely be different than information that is shared by community agencies or social support networks, it is imperative to have clear parameters around what types of information can be exchanged between your practice and your partners.

Provide care coordination to patients.

The following resources can help your practice develop your care coordination improvement strategy:

 

4. Continuous quality improvement of care coordination.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: QI lead, IBH implementation team.

  • Develop both formal and informal mechanisms to obtain feedback from providers, staff and patients on the effectiveness of your practice’s care coordination efforts and to identify areas for improvement.
  • Establish key performance indicators related to care coordination. Consider using AHRQ’s Care Coordination Quality Measures for Primary Care (CCQM-PC). Your performance indicators will vary based upon your improvement strategy and the needs of patients, but may include metrics, such as:
    • Number of assigned patients engaged in care.
    • Number of individuals with hypertension whose BP is controlled.
    • Percent of closed loop referrals by referral entity. Monitor and analyze metrics to gauge the effectiveness of your internal systems and how well each referral partner is promoting coordination and collaboration.
    • Number of patients with a high rate of emergency room visitation who have been introduced to the practice’s behavioral health staff.
  • Continue to build relationships with providers and community support agencies that are available to provide services to the practice’s patients.
  • Consider developing and using a care coordination variance report. Here is a sample patient care coordination variance report.

Implementation tips

  • An interoperable referral management system can help practices streamline the intake process, communicate with other providers and social service agencies, track the status and outcomes of referrals, and ensure that patients receive the appropriate level of care and support.
  • Leverage community health information exchanges (HIE) to gain access to admission, discharge, and transfer information. Absent being able to access an HIE, establish relationships with your local hospitals to be able to gain daily notification of your patients being discharged.

Going Deeper Key Activities

Activities that ensure your practice can achieve equitable improvement in depression screening and engage adolescents in depression screening and treatment.

KEY ACTIVITY #15:

Optimize Telehealth


 

Overview

Telehealth may be implemented in various ways, ranging from clinicians working off-site (e.g., at home) delivering care to patients in their home to clinicians in the office delivering care to patients by phone (e.g., audio-only telehealth). Telehealth is a preferred modality for many patients seeking behavioral health services, making it an important area of growth for most practices. This activity offers suggestions for enhancing the quality of telehealth services.

Why this matters

For most practices, BH services are at least partly delivered via telehealth; in 2023, BH was the type of health service most likely to be delivered via phone or video. In California, 60% of these telehealth visits are via video platform while 40% of all behavioral health visits are audio-only (e.g., phone).[74] Studies have repeatedly shown no differences in health outcomes between BH services delivered via phone, video or in-person.[75]

Telehealth BH visits are now permanently covered in California as a reimbursable service.

Implementation tips

  • Develop workflows that prioritize patient preferences for the modality of service for BH care. Ideally, patients are able to choose whether they receive services in person, on the phone, or via video. Research indicates patients prefer telehealth modalities for BH about 50% of the time.[76] Delivering services based on patient preferences lowers missed appointments, increases adherence to recommendations, and improves activation.[77]
  • Expand telehealth offerings in practices in rural areas, as distance to receive care is a barrier in rural counties; telehealth for BH services allows people to obtain care they would otherwise likely not receive.
  • Expand audio-only services to patients in geographic areas or homes with little or no internet access to receive necessary BH services.
  • Train BH staff and providers on delivering care via video and phone (e.g., audio-only). Care via video is similar to in-person visits, while delivering high-quality care via the telephone demands a different set of skills.
  • Ensure telehealth services support and enhance equity. Without intentional focus and effort, telehealth services can replicate inequities in traditional care. Make sure patient preferences are adhered to equally and anti-bias strategies are integrated into phone and video care; training for staff in other equity practices is crucial. A starting point for resources to support this are available below.
  • Offer digital navigation services for patients who prefer video visits but need assistance in accessing this. Demonstrate the telehealth option while a patient is in the clinic or dedicate a staff member to call patients ahead of appointments and walk them through the video set-up to help them overcome technical barriers. For patients needing further support, consider leveraging community health workers to offer a home visit to assist with establishing telehealth.

KEY ACTIVITY #16:

Provide Tailored Outreach, Screening and Treatment Management for Adolescent Behavioral Health


KEY ACTIVITY #16A:

Provide Proactive Inreach and Outreach to Help Adolescents Engage in Behavioral Healthcare


This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

The COVID-19 pandemic spurred rising rates of mental health disorders and distress, including a marked increase in adolescent ER visits for mental health conditions.[78] This reality heightens the need for effective inreach and outreach to adolescents for behavioral health services.

Outreach consists of identifying the behavioral healthcare (BH) needs of adolescents in the community, while inreach involves identifying the same among your practice’s patients. An initial step in both inreach and outreach is communicating with the community and your patients and their families about behavioral health conditions and the availability of BH services.

In California, a large statewide investment relevant to pediatric care is the Children and Youth Behavioral Health Initiative (CYBHI), which aims to expand access to school and community-based mental health counseling, virtual behavioral health services, and eConsults regardless of insurance coverage. See the resources below for more information about this initiative.

How are inreach and outreach different for adolescents?

Adolescence and early adulthood is a time in life when mental health problems may arise for the first time, though the age of onset varies with the particular behavioral health diagnosis.[79] While significant numbers of adolescents experience behavioral health needs, young people seeking care from mental health professionals often report that their concerns are invalidated by healthcare practitioners.[80][81] Contact with mental health and healthcare providers can threaten young people’s sense of agency, turning them away rather than towards connecting with mental health services. School-based counselors can be instrumental in providing effective outreach and inreach to adolescents.

These help-seeking patterns are complicated by the fact that many adolescents may be struggling with multiple sensitive issues, including but not limited to substance use, emerging ideas about sexual orientation and gender identity, bullying and abuse, body dissatisfaction, relationship issues, and changing physical development. Unfortunately, these are topics that not all adults feel comfortable discussing.

Implementation considerations

Rather than make singular recommendations regarding inreach and outreach to adolescents, teams should consider the combination of patient and family needs and staff capacity. Adolescence is not a single entity. The social and emotional needs of a patient at age 12 differ from that of a 17-year-old and, therefore, their relationships to family and peers change as well. Additionally, not all adolescents' developmental stages correlate with their chronological ages. Teams should consider opportunities for inreach and outreach that reflect these variations and nuances, especially when determining whether or not outreach is directed at the family unit or to the individual adolescent.

Inreach (reaching adolescents within the practice):

Outreach:

  • As suggested above, many adolescents do not seek help for behavioral health from their primary care provider. The practice may consider partnering or building on existing partnerships with organizations, such as schools, churches or community centers, to promote the availability of behavioral health services and care. Potential community partners will vary based on a clinic’s setting and should be contextually driven.
  • Practices can offer community presentations, workshops or classes directed at parents within the community to share supportive information and resources for families with adolescents.

Implementation tips

  • Engage staff who are closer in age to adolescents and can incorporate communication strategies that better reflect adolescent preferences.
  • Develop adolescent-specific treatment competencies with existing staff or consider hiring employees that come into practice with those skill sets and experience.

KEY ACTIVITY #16B:

Screen Adolescents for a Range of Behavioral Health Needs


This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This activity provides general recommendations on screening for behavioral health needs for adolescents aged 12 to 18 years. This guide uses depression as an example, as most practices begin behavioral health screening with depression. As the clinical team develops skills and familiarity with screening adolescents for depression, and staffing on teams includes individuals with expertise in treating and supporting adolescents with their mental health needs, the goal is to incorporate additional behavioral health screening strategies, such as screening for anxiety, suicide and unhealthy substance use. Patient concealment about depression, substance use and previous trauma history can be high for fear that reporting such experiences will lead to emergency response and/or reporting to protective services. Developing trust with adolescents can be effective in combating this common and understandable inclination. Additionally, as mentioned elsewhere, giving adolescents the option to engage or not in screening and a further option to answer screeners through self-report via methods such as a tablet that protects confidentiality may help.

Depression is among the leading causes of disability for all ages in the U.S. Children and adolescents who frequently experience depression have functional impairments in their school performance and in interactions with peers and family members. Depression can have long-term impacts and negatively affect children’s developmental trajectories. Children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) have higher rates of recurrent depression in adulthood, other mental disorders, and an increased risk for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide completion.[82]

Nationally, suicide is the second-leading cause of death among youth ages 10 to 19. Psychiatric disorders and previous suicide attempts increase suicide risk. Rates of suicide attempts and deaths vary by sex, age, and race and ethnicity.

Developing a process for reliably screening all adolescent children for behavioral health conditions is important because recent research reports higher rates of depression, suicide attempts and suicide rates among Black children, compared to the past.[83] Reasons for such disparities are likely multifactorial and include factors such as socioeconomic status, experiences of structural and overt racism, family structure, neighborhood effects, and childhood adversity.[84] Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been shown to influence the likelihood of adolescents experiencing mental health conditions, such as depression. Some hypothesize that lower engagement with mental health services, combined with adverse childhood experiences, result in high levels of unmet need in Black youth.[85] Mental health disorders in Native American/Alaska Native youth likely arise from similar patterns of historic trauma, adverse childhood experiences, and unhealthy substance use.[86]

Implementation considerations

Implement universal screening and follow-up for adolescents, starting with depression screening.

As with depression screening for adults, the most commonly used instrument for depression screening in adolescents is the PHQ-9. Teams often start with one depression screening questionnaire for all age groups and then, as they develop skills and internal capacity at screening and managing behavioral healthcare, they consider utilizing tools specific to different age groups or populations. The PHQ-A is an adolescent-specific version of the PHQ-9 and, therefore, a natural tool to transition to when seeking a screening tool more specific to adolescents. There are two HEDIS measures for depression screening; one is specific to a validated measure of depression and another is specific to the PHQ-9. While, in general, PHMI advocates for the use of the PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 for depression screening, there are some practices who have developed familiarity and ease with utilizing other validated tools. For a summary of additional validated tools for mental health screenings for adolescents, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) compiled this table. As with depression screening for adults, it is important to use a validated tool and adequately train staff to administer, score and interpret results.

For adolescents, screening responses can come from the patient or their caregiver but, ideally, adolescents are interviewed separately from their parents or caregivers. All positive screening results should lead to additional assessments to confirm diagnosis, determine symptom severity, assess suicide risk, and identify comorbid psychological problems.

While it is an important practice to screen for depression, not all young people at risk for suicide will endorse or experience symptoms of depression. Depression screening is best utilized alongside suicide risk screening (e.g., the PHQ-A and the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool). As mentioned above, screening for suicide alongside depression screening may be achievable as your integrated behavioral healthcare model evolves, or it may be something that your team is ready to test now.

As your team develops confidence in assessing and managing depression, expand to screen for other BH needs, such as anxiety and ADHD. Consider tools, such as the adverse childhood experiences screen for adolescents (PEARLS), the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), and/or the CRAFFT for substance use.

Implementation tips

The workflow for depression screening among adolescents is similar to that described in the Key Activity 9A: Screen Adults for Depression, Including Suicidality and includes the following:

  • Training staff in implementing adolescent-specific tools. This includes training staff to ask and score the tool and workflow considerations about identifying and implementing a different tool for patients as they age.
  • Incorporating strategies into well and sick visits that normalize and help families prepare for interviewing adolescents alone. For example, letting families know at the 11-year-old well-child visit that next year’s visit will include a portion when the adolescent is interviewed alone, including discussing what will be covered and legal rights around confidentiality.
  • Troubleshooting with staff about what to do, such as normalizing the activity, suggesting for future visits, and responding to family concerns/reservations, if families or adolescents do not agree with allowing the adolescent to be interviewed separately

Evidence base for this activity

  • Bridge JA, Horowitz LM, Fontanella CA, Sheftall AH, Greenhouse J, Kelleher KJ, et al. Age-Related Racial Disparity in Suicide Rates Among US Youths From 2001 Through 2015. JAMA Pediatrics. 2018 Jul 1;172(7):697.
  • Garcia JL. Historical Trauma and American Indian/Alaska Native Youth Mental Health Development and Delinquency. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 2020 Jan;2020(169):41–58.
  • Patra KP, Kumar R. Screening For Depression and Suicide in Children [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35015441/
  • Viswanathan M, Wallace I, Middleton JC, Kennedy SM, McKeeman J, Hudson K, et al. Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. PubMed. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36282939/
  • Zuckerbrot RA, Cheung A, Jensen PS, Stein REK, Laraque D. Guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care (GLAD-PC): Part I. practice preparation, identification, assessment, and initial management. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2018 Feb 26;141(3):1–21. Available from: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/141/3/e20174081

KEY ACTIVITY #16C:

Manage Treatment of Adolescents’ Behavioral Health Needs in Integrated Person-Centered Ways


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; behavioral health integration.

Overview

This activity provides general recommendations on the treatment of adolescents’ behavioral health needs in integrated and person-centered ways. As with adults, evidence-based care practices include the following (singularly or in combination):

  • Psychopharmacology, including referring out or leveraging same-day consults with child psychiatrists (described below), when needed.
  • Behavioral health interventions, such as motivational interviewing, acceptance and commitment therapy, problem-solving therapy for primary care (PST-PC), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), interpersonal counseling, behavioral activation, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).
  • Peer support.

For additional information regarding behavioral treatment in general, refer to Key Activity 12B: Embed Evidence-Based Care Practices. The provision of these services differs for adolescents, as it is ideally provided by clinicians who have training, experience and comfort in responding to the behavioral health needs of adolescents.

Model recommendations for treatment that resonate with youth include:

  • Involving youth as partners in project design.
  • Implementing and monitoring recommendations made by youth.
  • Considering the ways that a fundamental understanding and respect for youth can be incorporated into ongoing inreach and outreach efforts.

Confidentiality and adolescent care

Youth list concerns about confidentiality as the number one reason they might forgo medical care. For this reason, youth need assurances of privacy and confidentiality from their healthcare providers. However, many providers feel overwhelmed or in the dark about the myriad of laws governing confidentiality and their responsibilities in minor consent laws and reporting child abuse. It is beyond the scope of this activity to include all relevant details, but it is encouraged that teams take advantage of such resources as Understanding Confidentiality and Minor Consent in California: An Adolescent Provider Toolkit and Teen Health Law’s charts on California Minor Consent and Confidentiality Laws to familiarize themselves with when minors may consent and when parents may – or must – be informed. Given that parents’ rights to access adolescent medical records depend upon the health service provided, who consented or could have consented for the service, and the service provision site, in most cases, parents will have a right to access their child’s records. However, in some cases, parents cannot access records until their teen provides them with written authorization.

Teams need to consider what processes and workflows are necessary to maintain confidential records in the EHR setting. This includes training staff to know how to document in a manner that maintains adolescent confidentiality. In addition, they should provide education about parental access to medical record information to adolescents and their families. As communication, such as texting and portal communication (e.g., emailing) become more ubiquitous, teams must consider alternative mechanisms by which to communicate with adolescents about the elements of their medical record that they want to be kept confidential.

Implementation tips

As patients need a greater level of psychiatric care than can be provided in the health center setting, practices should refer and connect them with county-level services. The mental health plan (MHP) in each county is responsible for providing or arranging for the provision of specialty mental health services (SMHS) to Medi-Cal beneficiaries in their county. SMHS are meant to support a beneficiary when the impact of their condition is severe enough for them to require the services of a specialist, as opposed to a generalist, in the field of mental health. The health center team continues to provide integrated care with an emphasis on care coordination rather than treatment provision. As an individual’s severity of mental health needs wax and wane, the health center could again be the provider of behavioral health treatment and support. behavioral health treatment and support.

Many practices are not able to employ staff who have training and experience in working with adolescents. To address the dual pressures of the behavioral health workforce shortage and increasing rates of childhood mental health conditions, 37 states and the District of Columbia staff psychiatric consultation lines that offer free same-day telephone consultation with child psychiatrists.[87] In California, this resource has been offered since 2019 by the UCSF Benoit Children’s Hospital through the UCSF Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Portal (CAPP). CAPP provides telephone consultation for pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) to help them manage common mental health conditions in their patients.

In addition, CAPP offers continuing medical education (CME) for PCPs, website resources for PCPs and patients and families, and direct virtual psychological consultation for families, and it aids with care coordination for families having difficulty accessing needed mental health resources.

DHCS’s new behavioral health virtual services platform launched for public consumption in January 2024 and offers technology-enabled behavioral health tools and services focused on adolescents and young adults: BrightLife Kids for parents and caregivers, young children, and adolescents and Soluna for teens and young adults.

In addition to knowing that such a service is available, integrated teams should consider familiarizing themselves with how to access such resources (e.g., typical wait times for connecting, conditions best suited for referral, etc.). In addition, teams can consider how to incorporate consultancy notes from the psychiatric consultation lines into the clinic records, including who has visibility.

Evidence base for this activity

Zuckerbrot RA, Cheung A, Jensen PS, Stein REK, Laraque D. Guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care (GLAD-PC): Part I. practice preparation, identification, assessment, and initial management. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2018 Feb 26;141(3):1–21. Available from: https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/141/3/e20174081

KEY ACTIVITY #17:

Continue to Develop Referral Relationships and Pathways


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: operationalize clinical guidelines; pre-visit planning and care gap reduction; care coordination; address social needs.

Overview

Behavioral health integration strategies and expanding your practice’s capacity to provide BH services can be paired with continuing to expand your network of off-site BH providers. Examples include referrals from the practice to a provider, such as behavioral health and social services providers, or to a program that will support health and well-being. A referral network also includes acute and subacute facilities, such as hospitals, emergency departments and residential treatment facilities, where a patient may receive treatment and the outcome of treatment is necessary for the ongoing care of the patient in the practice.

This activity addresses common steps that your practice can take to optimize both referral pathways and outcomes. The practice of closed loop referrals in which there is a feedback mechanism to ensure that a referral made by one provider to another is completed and followed up appropriately leads to greater patient and provider satisfaction. As your practice strengthens its evidence-based referral practices, including warm handoffs and the use of motivational interviewing to assess and address readiness for referral, you can develop your referral network. This activity builds on an inventory of existing referral services outside the clinic and identifies steps that can be taken to support the systematic management of the referral process.

When a patient requires a referral to obtain needed services outside the clinic, the process is a point of vulnerability and a significant percent of specialty referrals aren’t completed, in part due to missing information, misguided referrals, and faulty communications.[88][89] If a referral is not completed, patients may not receive needed services, which can lead to decreased quality of care, decreased patient and provider satisfaction, and ultimately poorer health outcomes.[90]

A contributor to inequity in health outcomes is unequal access to specialty services and resources to help patients with their condition.[91] The heart of this activity is to empower both the care team and patients through development and maintenance of a robust process to help patients access medical, behavioral health and community resources.

Many factors can impact whether or not a patient accesses a referral, including language, culture and lack of understanding of why the referral is being requested. Lack of understanding of why a referral is being sought is often a barrier for patients to follow up with a referral.

When appropriate, referrals for social needs and to community health programs can help address barriers, including those around transportation, language, and basic needs of food and housing stability, all of which are associated with poorer health outcomes.

Electronic support for providing access to referral resources is important in the EHR (requiring continuous updating of the database) and for care managers. For care managers and coordinators, externally maintained electronic referral databases are available.

The ability to track referrals (e.g., closed loop) remains challenging for most EHRs and often requires partially manual processes in EHRs and care coordination or population management applications. These manual processes are often facilitated through the construction of a separate registry in which teams can log appointments and track the referrals and document completion. This approach requires some process for documenting and updating the status of orders in the EHR.

Population-level reports can identify resource needs and gaps and guide efforts for improving sources of services.

Action steps and roles

1. Identify types of referral partners that your practice needs and gaps in resource availability.

Work with the care teams and the IBH implementation team to identify gaps in referral resources that could enhance implementation of evidence-based care. Consider high-volume specialties, such as social service and substance use providers.

In areas where you have gaps in referral providers, Telehealth services may be an option. For further information on Telehealth services including e-consult, synchronous, asynchronous, and eVisits, contact your Managed Care Plan and/or refer to Telehealth Reimbursement Guide (pages 14-16). Referral processes and tracking are also important to establish for Telehealth as well as in-person services.

Use social health screening results that have been disaggregated by REAL and SOGI alongside patient/family feedback to identify unmet needs for which resource relationships have not been established.
 

2. Assess what tools would be beneficial for the core elements of your referral process.

Examples include (see resources below):

  • Referral request form.
    • Determine what information is required for the provider and who is receiving the referral. Information may include the requested service, timing (e.g., urgent vs. standard), and the minimum necessary information, such as the patient’s contact information, applicable demographics, and appropriate clinical and social support questions.
  • Referral tracking spreadsheet or software.
    • Information in a tracking system can include the date of referral, appointment status, and whether follow-up is needed. Reach out to your Medi-Cal managed care plans (MCPs) as you are developing referral tracking processes. The MCPs are required to show that Medi-Cal patients are being connected to the services that they are eligible for and referred to; this includes preventive services, specialty services and social services. The MCP may be a good resource for tools, such as those needed for tracking and reporting.
  • Referral workflow diagram.
    • A visual representation or workflow diagram can support staff in the referral process. Operational integration of behavioral health services means ensuring all referrals, including behavioral health referrals, are integrated in the organization’s referral structure. IHI’s Closing the Loop: A Guide to Safer Ambulatory Referrals in the EHR Era provides a visual nine-step closed loop referral process for specialty referrals as well as suggestions for improving the process.

 

3. Assess what tools would be beneficial in enhancing and tracking your referral process.

  • Referral guidelines.
    • For social services, positive responses to screening questions or tools may be the prompt for referral.
    • Other types of referrals may be optimized by having documented referral guidelines, such as information needed by specialty provider, in order to best answer referral questions.
  • Communication templates.
    • For high-volume or frequent referral types, a standardized template for communication between the clinic and referral staff can help ensure that essential information is conveyed efficiently. Examples may include referral letters, progress notes, and post-visit summaries of the plan of care.
  • Patient education materials (develop in conjunction with a referral network).
    • Educational materials and resources that explain the referral process and what to expect can enhance patients’ understanding and support referral completion. In addition, consider training medical assistants as well as any dedicated care coordination staff in evidence-based communication techniques, such as teach-back or motivational interviewing, to leverage team-based care in supporting the patient to follow through with the referral after the visit.

 

4. Develop approaches to fill resource gaps.

  • Reach out to your managed care plan (MCP) to understand what resources are available. MCPs are required to have online provider directories that include specialists, which can be a resource used by a practice to help find contracted specialists near the patient's home. In addition to comprehensive networks of over a dozen core specialty providers and information on behavioral health and substance use resources, many MCPs are building links to access community-based resources through referral platforms that act as a hub to coordinate social needs for patients.
  • Identify external providers and community resources that can serve as partners in care and use the established referral process to fill the gaps in care that they can address.
  • Meet or schedule time with high-volume providers, including community-based organizations, to develop a mutual understanding of the goals of referrals and opportunities for the development of a shared process (e.g. referral form).
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics offers a sample tool to develop a resource list.

 

5. Regularly review, assess and update the referral processes and network.

As new patient needs are identified, use that opportunity to identify potential resources and expand the referral network. If practices have trouble accessing a contracted specialist for their patient because of either overly long wait times or that they are longer accepting new patients, the MCP is required to approve an out-of-network referral to a more available specialist.
On a periodic basis, review referral tracking reports to identify referral resources that are used most frequently and use that information to reinforce the relationships and provide feedback on value.

Review referral tracking reports to identify resources for which loop closure is lacking or from whom required information is not being received on a regular basis. Reach out to these organizations to reinforce expectations or, if necessary, identify a replacement resource for the network.

Review referral patterns to identify the most common BH referrals (e.g., Enhanced Care Management, psychiatry, therapy, SUD) and completion rates. High levels of off-site referrals with low completion rates can be used as indicators of services that would be better developed inside the practice.

For going deeper in tracking quality improvement metrics, practices can develop metrics to assess the effectiveness of the referral network. This might include tracking referral completion rates, patient satisfaction, and time from referral to specialist appointment.

KEY ACTIVITY #18:

Strengthen Community Partnerships


 

This key activity involves the following elements of person-centered population-based care: proactive patient outreach and engagement; care coordination; address social needs.

Overview

Strengthening partnerships with community-based organizations that share the practice’s vision and goals for their patient population enables the practice to provide more holistic care to patients and leverage many of the strengths and resources available in the community. These partners provide various services and programs to the community, such as education, housing, food, transportation, employment and social support.

This activity provides considerations and tips for strengthening partnerships, although note that deep engagement in this work can require significant resources from your practice.

Many community-based organizations have a deep understanding of the needs and preferences of specific subpopulations and the resources and challenges that exist in the local context. They can support outreach and health literacy efforts, participate in co-design by providing insight around a particular patient population, and provide resources and support for patients.

Building and strengthening relationships with community-based partners can extend the reach and impact of practices by facilitating patient access to services that the practice is unable to provide. Through partnerships with organizations that provide housing supports, nutrition assistance, transportation, and other social health supports, practices can play an active role in helping to address the social needs of their patients. The PHMI Equity Framework and Approach should inform partnership development to ensure the work of partnership building is prioritizing community groups that experience injustice and structural violence.

Action steps and roles

1. Start by understanding the resources and partnerships available through Medi-Cal.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Clinic operations and leadership staff who will liaise with community partners.

Resources include supports that are available to all Medi-Cal patients, such as transportation to medical appointments, as well Medi-Cal Community Supports for eligible individuals with higher levels of social needs. The following is a list of social support resources that are available to Medi-Cal patients when eligibility criteria are met.

  • Transportation to medical and other Medi-Cal-covered appointments.
  • In-home supportive services: Personal home care assistance for those who qualify.
  • Community-based adult services: Day programs outside the home for individuals who need assistance with activities of daily living.

For individuals with the highest needs, the14 Medi-Cal Community Supports are:

  • Housing transition navigation services.
  • Housing deposits.
  • Housing tenancy and sustaining services.
  • Short-term post-hospitalization housing.
  • Recuperative care (medical respite).
  • Day habilitation programs.
  • Caregiver respite services.
  • Nursing facility transition or diversion to assisted living facilities.
  • Community transition services or nursing facility transition to a home.
  • Personal care and homemaker services.
  • Environmental accessibility adaptations (e.g., home modifications).
  • Medically supportive food or meals or medically tailored meals.
  • Sobering centers.
  • Asthma remediation.

For specific providers in your area, contact the provider services department of your Medi-Cal managed care plan to learn more about the providers of these services. With a list of contracted community-based organizations, your practice can start to build relationships and support ongoing social needs for your patients. The Behavioral Health Recovery Services Project supports a wide range of community investments to promote behavioral health equity. Learn about and leverage local resources as partners.

For an overview of Community Supports in the state, DHCS has provided information about the current state of Enhanced Care Management and Community Supports in the Community Supports Year 1 Summary and the Enhanced Care Management Year 1 Summary.
 

2. Complete an environmental scan to understand who your patients identify as trusted messengers and resources in your community.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Health center leadership, community health workers, care coordination staff.

This can be completed by interviewing patients and families, especially with the assistance of community health workers as adept listeners. Confirm existing partner relationships and, as noted above, leverage local resources of the Behavioral Health Recovery Services Project. After that, a stakeholder map and community profile of key current and prospective partners can be developed.

For behavioral health, key community partners include schools, homeless services providers, government, and community-based programs (e.g., youth activities).
 

3. Convene partners as a work group to develop strategies and interventions to address health-related social needs.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Health center leadership.

In some cases, your practice may serve as a convener, bringing partners together for collaboration to avoid relying on individual relationships with external organizations. Be clear on your asks and offers to ensure the relationship will be mutually beneficial.

Develop a shared aim statement with your partners as to why this work is important and your vision of what you hope to achieve. Following the aim statement, formalize your structure and system of collaboration accountability for progress in the form of ongoing pacing of meetings on a regular basis, rather than relying on transactional relationships.

To ensure the proper understanding of expectations, roles and commitments, memorandums of understanding should be developed. Of note, California has data-sharing requirements for clinics and community-based organizations that help with referrals, coordination and data-sharing. Some organizations will be required to share data through the California Data Exchange Framework (DxF) starting in January 2024.
 

4. Collaborate with your partners to co-develop and deliver on a shared set of strategies on a community approach to address health-related social needs.

Suggested team member(s) responsible: Health center leadership.

The practice should benchmark and collate approaches to identify potential interventions for addressing health-related social needs. Developing a driver diagram can help guide your efforts and set priorities. Leverage CalAIM resources as part of your intervention plans.

Use workflow mapping tools, swim lane diagrams, and checklists that clarify roles and plan initiatives. This allows for the practice to develop clear action plans that clarify leaders of intervention strategies, timetables, and measures of progress and success.

Implementation tips

  • Learn what is in place for your county through the Medi-Cal program and your managed care plans. If resources are not available, explore technologies that facilitate community referrals, such as findhelp.org and Unite Us cross-sector collaboration software.
    Health centers are very adept at developing relationships in the community but are often challenged in nurturing partnerships for a variety of practical reasons. A partnership starts with relationships, moves beyond referral for resources or support, and results in co-ownership for addressing community challenges.
  • Have an offer as well as an ask when approaching a prospective partner. Nurture the relationship and avoid becoming transactional, ensuring the partnership has value for all parties and helps others fulfill their mission.
  • Seek to understand your partner’s needs for results, data and reporting. Explore how the partnership can help your partner meet a need or pain point in their core business mission.
  • Going deeper in strengthening partnerships: Addressing community needs requires sustainable and effective partnerships over time. A future activity includes determining how your organization works with other community partners in an ongoing forum to address community needs. This often involves the health center as a backbone organization supporting a local collaboration governance structure for shared prioritization and action planning.
  • On the horizon in strengthening partnerships: A mature partnership system in a health center includes assessing the effectiveness of partnerships and finding ways to continuously ensure alignment so that partnership remains a positive force for all participants. Where possible, explore making adjustments that strengthen the partnerships (e.g., improved data sharing, pooling of resources to increase leverage in the community).

KEY ACTIVITY #19:

Strengthen a Culture of Equity


 
This activity builds off of your practice's Key Activity 11: Use a Systematic Approach to Address Inequities within the Population of Focus to provide strategies and in-depth resources that can help practices create or strengthen a culture of equity in your practice. The PHMI Equity Framework and Approach emphases that achieving long-term and sustainable improvements to health and racial equity for patients and the broader ecosystem requires a transformational shift at the organizational level.

The following strategies can help practices strengthen a culture of equity:

  • Demonstrate senior leadership’s ownership of and commitment to improving health equity.
  • Understand and address internalized, personally mediated and institutionalized racism.
    • This should include ongoing learning and development activities on the full range of health equity topics (e.g., anti-bias, structural racism, race-based algorithms).
  • Build organizational capacity to support efforts to improve health equity.
  • Establish practices and policies to promote workforce diversity and provide culturally and linguistically appropriate care.
  • Support policy efforts to eliminate inequities driven by social drivers of health.

On the Horizon Key Activities

Activities focused on improving care delivery with people with severely impacting mental illness.

KEY ACTIVITY #20:

Improve Care of People with More Severely Impacting Conditions


 

Overview

Your practice is likely already serving people with severely impacting behavioral health conditions. Depending on the capacity of the local county mental health departments, some practices’ IBH departments may see a fairly high percentage of these patients. Practices located in severe clinician shortage areas, such as the Inland Empire, Central Valley and Northern and Sierra regions, may be the primary mental health provider in the region across the continuum of severity.

Improving integrated behavioral healthcare for health center patients with more severely impacting conditions most often requires increasing skills and experience of health center staff and greater integration with resources available outside of the health center. Strategies and resources for enhancing care for patients with more severely impacting conditions include:

  • Refer and connect patients that need a greater level of psychiatric care than can be provided in the health center setting to with county-level mental health plan services.
    • DHCS provides a Transition of Care Tool to be used when an individual who is receiving mental health services from one delivery system experiences a change in their service needs and their existing services need to be added from or transitioned to the other delivery system.
    • The mental health plan (MHP) in each county is responsible for providing or arranging for the provision of specialty mental health services (SMHS) to Medi-Cal beneficiaries in their county. SMHS are meant to support a beneficiary when the impact of their condition is severe enough for them to require the services of a specialist, as opposed to a generalist in the field of mental health. The health center team continues to provide integrated care with an emphasis on care coordination rather than treatment provision. As an individual’s severity of mental health needs wax and wane, the health center could again be the provider of behavioral health treatment and support.
  • Enhance the organization’s accommodations for people with more severely impacting mental health conditions, as the practice does for patients with other disabilities. Ensure that there is a care manager supporting patients with severely impacting conditions with a co-created care plan to meet the person’s needs, build on their strengths and support their life and health goals.
    • Care management provides a higher level of support to individuals who have medical, behavioral health and/or social needs that impact their ability to access appropriate levels of care. Individuals may be receiving frequent ER and hospital care that could be avoided with care management activities and/or patients may have significant social barriers (e.g., housing, food, substance use) that prevent them from accessing preventative and wellness care. Care management services are more focused, require the development of a person-centered care plan, and are of higher intensity than care coordination services.
    • Medi-Cal beneficiaries with complex needs, including severely impacting behavioral health conditions, may be eligible for a Medi-Cal benefit known as Enhanced Care Management (ECM). Practices may have their own ECM program, in which case the care team can add an ECM care manager to the team. If the practice does not have ECM care managers, the care team can either connect to the patient’s ECM care manager or refer to a community-based organization that is providing ECM services.Practices may have their own ECM program, in which case the care team can add an ECM care manager to the team. If the practice does not have ECM care managers, the care team can either connect to the patient’s ECM care manager, or refer to a community based organization that is providing ECM services.
  • Increase the primary care provider’s knowledge, comfort and confidence in prescribing the full range of psychotropic and addiction treatment medications.[92]
  • Develop knowledge around emergency and on-going treatment options for substance use disorders.
  • Ensure access to psychiatric support either through on-site providers, co-management relationships with community psychiatric resources, or telehealth arrangements.
  • Ensure care plans follow a stepped care model for delivering and monitoring mental health treatment so that the most effective yet least resource-intensive treatment is delivered first. “Step up” to intensive or specialist services as required and depending on the level of patient’s desire, distress or need.
    • A proposed alternative to stepped care is staged care, which uses a risk-stratified approach to selecting intervention levels to provide the right care the first time.
  • Pursue recovery‐oriented care that prioritizes autonomy, empowerment and respect for the person receiving services to enhance treatment engagement. Specifically, person‐centered care, including shared decision-making, focuses on an individual's unique goals and life circumstances. These of person‐centered care in mental health treatment strategies shows promising engagement outcomes.
  • Ensure that BH staff and clinicians are confident in and comfortable treating patients across the continuum of severity.

Implementation tips

  • Practices which counter prejudice including anti-sanism, anti-bias practices, and cultural humility are important in building trust with all patients and especially so with people with severely impacting conditions due to historic and systemic marginalization, oppression and discrimination. There are a lot of resources which can support organizations in using less stigmatizing language, such as the Recovery Research Institute’s addictionary.
  • Ensure training for staff and providers in applying empathic practices, especially those addressing active psychosis and de-escalation practices, with people who experience more severely impacting mental health conditions.
  • Learn who a patient’s community mental health provider is, sign a release of information to facilitate information sharing, and learn if they have a care manager. If they do, talk with the patient about their comfort and interest in and enthusiasm for having the care manager participate in routine medical visits.
  • Patients with more severely impacting conditions can be a source of expertise in learning about community resources; they may be connected to additional community resources such as peer support through local clubhouses, vocational programs, etc.
  • Learn about the community mental health organizations that exist within your community. Begin by asking patients where they feel supported in the community. When you have identified a specific organization, explore their requirements to facilitate information sharing. Learn about their services, intake process and factors for determining access for patients.

Appendices

APPENDIX A:

Sample Idealized System Diagram


 

WEAVING YOUR MEASUREMENT STRATEGY AND LEARNING SYSTEM INTO PRACTICE OPERATIONS

The below graphic provides an example to visualize the flow of information between a practice’s measurement strategy and actions at the practice and care team levels, including how to use the information for continual learning and improvement.

Phmi Weavingyourmeasurementstrategy R2

APPENDIX B:

Theory of Change


The key activities in this guide align with the PHMI theory of change for how practices can increase engagement of integrated behavioral healthcare for the practice’s patients through three main drivers:

  • People have access to integrated behavioral healthcare.
  • People engage in care to support their behavioral health.
  • Practices have needed support to develop and implement integrated BH care.

FIGURE 13: PHMI BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DRIVER DIAGRAM

Phmi Behavioralhealthdriverdiagram

APPENDIX C:

C: Developing a Robust Measurement Strategy


 

FIGURE 14: DEVELOPING YOUR MEASUREMENT STRATEGY MILESTONES

Figure 14 illustrates the key milestones in the development of a robust measurement strategy.

Phmi Measurementstrategymilestones

FIGURE 15: DEFINITION AND EXAMPLES FOR MEASUREMENT STRATEGY MILESTONES

Figure 15 provides guidance on each of these milestones as you work to put in place a robust yet practical measurement strategy to improve outcomes for adolescents and adults with behavioral health needs.


Milestone

Definition

Example for Adults with Behavioral Health Conditions

Aim(s)

The overall goal(s) of the improvement effort. “What are we trying to accomplish?”

We often recommend sub-aims to focus your team on intermediate goals. You can develop data-informed specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound, inclusive and equitable (SMARTIE) goals focused on improving specific aspects of care for attributed patients or subpopulations of patients.

Overall aim: People who are struggling with depression receive appropriate care that fits their needs.

Example sub-aim: By December 2025, we will increase the percent of Black and Hispanic or Latino/a patients aged 12 and older who had a depression screen in the last 12 months from 59% to 95%.


Concept(s)

A general, abstract notion (e.g., approach, thought, belief, or perception) related to the aim(s) of focus.

Measures

Specific, objective ways to determine the extent to which an aim has been met or to determine if there has been improvement in the concepts of focus. Measures help us to answer the question, “How will we know that a change is an improvement?” Measures generally fall into one of three types:

  • Outcome measures: Measure the performance of the system(s) of focus and always relate directly to the aim(s). Outcome measures are focused on the end results and offer evidence that changes are actually having an impact at the system level.
  • Process measures: Pertain to the activities, steps or actions taken within the system(s) of focus that are believed to be most related to improving the outcome(s) of focus. These measures help evaluate efficiency, effectiveness and consistency. Process measures are essential for understanding how well the system is working and can be early indicators of improvement
  • Balancing measures: Look at a system from different directions or dimensions, including the effects a change may have on other parts of the system. This also includes a way of measuring unintended consequences or effects further upstream or downstream.

See below for example outcomes, process and balancing measures.

For the following examples, we will examine the percentage of people aged 12 and up who were screened for depression using a standard screening tool and, if positive, received follow-up care within 30 days.


Operational definitions

A detailed description in quantifiable terms of what to measure and the steps to follow to measure it consistently each time and over time. The operational definitions help make the measure clear and unambiguous and often contain criteria for inclusion or exclusion and numerator/denominator.

Depression screening: Percentage of people aged 12 and older who were screened for depression using a standard screening tool and, if positive, received follow-up care within 30 days. The CMS specifications of this measure are available here.


Data collection plan

A detailed set of instructions that generally includes:

  • Who (specifically) will collect the data.
  • How (specifically) the data will be collected.
  • Where and how the data will be stored.
  • When the data will be collected.
  • How often (e.g., frequency) the data will be collected.

Depression screening data collection plan:

Who:

  • Reception staff with medical assistant.

How:

  • Reception staff hands out questionnaire upon check-in; MA enters results into the EHR when rooming.

Where and how the data will be stored:

  • Within the patient record in a field where data can be pulled for an automated report.

When the data will be collected:

  • Data will be collected during patient visits (when indicated on the care gap report).
  • Follow-ups should be documented within the EHR as appropriate.

How often:

  • Reports to evaluate improvement of the practice as a whole will occur on a quarterly basis.

Data collection

The process of collecting the agreed upon measures in accordance with the relevant operational definitions and the agreed upon data collection plan.

Analysis and action

The process of analyzing the data, including instructions for the analysis and visualization of the data, disseminating the data to relevant parties, and using the data to track progress and guide improvement efforts.

Depression screening analysis and action:
During the improvement period, the QI team reviews data on a weekly basis. The care team and panel manager review the data subsequently once per quarter for ongoing monitoring.

APPENDIX D:

Guidance on Technological Interventions


EHRs were primarily designed to manage individual patients rather than groups of patients. However, over time, EHRs have increasingly added functionality for population-level quality reporting and management and some degree of care planning and care coordination, especially to support value-based care tracking and reporting. Practices should evaluate your EHR capabilities against specifically designed population management applications. While these applications require interface with the EHR, they generally offer additional functionality. While EHR solutions are integrated with EHR data, they still usually require import of data from outside sources to be optimally useful. Managed care organizations may provide care coordination and population management applications, usually only for their own enrolled patients. EHR-based solutions may also pose challenges where groups of practices using different EHR solutions are collaborating in value-based care contracts.

In value-based care arrangements, practices are responsible for attributed patients who may have never been seen. Since these patients do not have records in the EHR, practices need to consider how they can manage these patients to engage them into care at the practice in the absence, at least initially, of the patients having records within the EHR. If your practice is using freestanding applications for this, they need the capacity to handle these attributed patients who have not been registered as patients.

FIGURE 16: CORE POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONALITY REQUIREMENTS

Figure 16 includes the technical functionalities required to support population management for people with behavioral health conditions or needs. These requirements can guide the evaluation of existing solutions or guide the development of requirements in evaluating potential new applications. The table also indicates the data sources required to enable the functionality.


#

Functionality

Population Health Management Requirement Description

Data Acquisition Dependency

1

Care guidelines

Identify care gaps for all people with behavioral health conditions against care protocol.

Care guidelines may be presentable to the clinical provider or support team at the point of care through the EHR, in the visit workflow, as previsit prep or team huddle, through registries as above, and as aspirational prompts to patients or caregivers.

Commercial EHR-embedded guidelines provided by the vendor or customized by the practice.

External source guidelines.

Reference sites made available electronically.


2

Registries

The ability to produce registries (e.g., lists or cohort of patients) organized to facilitate population management for people with behavioral health conditions.

These registries should consider the inclusion of functionality to trigger automated pre-defined action(s) and/or human-initiated action(s) for all or a defined subset of patients comprising the registry.

Suggested HIT assets that can be leveraged to achieve this function include:

  • EHR: Generate a list of patients who meet the criteria for inclusion in the population of focus. Track using an external database. Consider merging patients from an external data source, such as a payor, to have a complete roster.
  • Population health management tool.

EHR: Clinical data; scheduling data for appointments; adult wellness and sick visits; preventive screening history; and screening data (see below).

External data sources, such as: reference labs, specialty care, immunization registries, or social service providers’ data.


3

Clinical decision support (CDS)

Care gaps should be displayed based on what is due with insight into previous results to support the clinician’s ability to make decisions at the point of care for the provider and care team members supporting non-point of care management.

Care guidelines may be presentable as clinical decision support to the clinical provider and support team at the point of care, in the visit workflow, as pre-visit prep or team huddle, through registries as above, and as aspirational prompts to patients or caregivers. While EHR-based prompts are usually thought of as ideal, team-based care presents an opportunity for CDS to be presented to other members of the care team through other channels.

The Five Rights Framework Clinical Decision Support: More Than Just ‘Alerts’ Tipsheet—September 2014 (cms.gov) is useful guidance to help health centers support decision-making across a wide range of the care delivery lifecycle, broader teams, and technology other than the EHR to look beyond office visits and providers. This is especially important to avoid alert fatigue and burnout.

Internal EHR data.

External source clinical data.

Claims data (clinical lag should be noted).

Electronic guideline specifications.

Patient-contributed data.


4

Care dashboards and reports

Behavioral Health Dashboard: Population view by eligible study with sorting/filtering capability, based on characteristics to be defined by the practice, with ability for care team/ case managers to document the actions completed; the ability to see care gaps at a patient level and population level according to the health center’s prioritized care guidelines. Note that, to automate these reports, it is necessary to apply standardized data collection strategies against electronically specified protocols

Same as above (e.g., EHR data and external data sources, data from other sources of care).

Claims data.


5

Quality reports

Same as above by quality measures, as opposed to care guidelines. The ability to track HEDIS as well as customized measures and UDS.

Quality measure specifications.

Same as above (e.g., EHR data and external data sources, data from other sources of care).

Claims data.


6

Risk stratification

The ability to categorize risk for patients and develop lists according to risk classification (e.g., tie to registry).

Can be imported as externally generated risk score or calculated internally according to proprietary or customized risk algorithm.

Data acquisition platform ingestion: already curated high-risk list ingested and utilized downstream in the journey.

and/or

Additional internal and external data sources to populate the defined risk model.


7

Inreach and engagement

Allow for inreach to support pre-visit planning or post-visit care needs, such as assessments.

Technology channels include population registry outputs and patient-facing applications, such as patient portal, freestanding text messaging, and self-assessment or self-management applications.

Same as above (e.g., clinical, EHR, etc.).

Claims data.


8

Care management

Allow for management of specific and unique care needs for high-risk patients. Care management requires the ability for multiple members of the care team to contribute to and rack elements of the plan. Challenges with freestanding care management applications include access to data from other sources of care, including the ability to track referrals, and workflow burden of staff utilizing multiple applications.

The ability of the care management application to draw from and write back to the EHR is desirable but difficult to achieve.

Care management protocols.

Appointment data ( internal and external).

Clinical data from external service providers.

FIGURE 17: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR RECOMMENDED SCREENING FOR KEY ACTIVITIES

This table identifies strategies for using digital tools to complete appropriate screeners as recommended by clinical guidelines. Using technology to facilitate screening may streamline the workflow and preserve patient confidentiality where necessary.


ID

Focus Area

Completion of Digital Screeners

Data Acquisition Dependency

1

Depression screening

In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.*

Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores.

2

Anxiety screening

In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.*

Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores.

3

Unhealthy substance user screening

In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.*

Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores.

4

Social needs screening

In-office tablet-based screening and/or remote patient-facing application-based self-completed screening.*

Population health and EHR integration of screener responses or, at minimum, scores.

*A workflow for identifying emergent behavioral health risks and a workflow for preserving patient confidentiality should be codified.

FIGURE 18: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR PATIENT INREACH AND PRE-VISIT PLANNING FOR KEY ACTIVITIES

This table outlines the use of technology to facilitate specific activities and potential technology solutions that can optimize the uptake and efficiency of in-office visits.


ID

Technology Focus

Patient Inreach and Pre-Visit Planning

Data Acquisition Dependency

1

Portal-based communication

  • Appointment reminders.
  • Medication reconciliation.
  • Consents.

EHR interface and integration.

2

AI-enabled chatbots

  • Appointment reminders.
  • Pre-visit education regarding routine screening, health maintenance, and anticipatory guidance.
  • Pre-visit planning and screening (e.g., social needs, development).

Identifying issues that need to be addressed before an office visit that can be converted to telehealth visits.


Population health and EHR incorporation of screening scores and responses.

3

Text messaging

Appointment reminders.

EHR interface and integration.

FIGURE 19: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCED PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND VIRTUAL CARE FOR GOING DEEPER ACTIVITIES

The table identifies technology solutions to engage patients asynchronously from office visits for a variety of use cases to enhance care and patient experience.


ID

Focus Area

Patient Engagement and Mobile Technology

Data Acquisition Dependency

1

AI-enabled Chatbots

  • Triage protocols for acute care needs.
  • Conversion from triage dialogues to telehealth Visit for use cases that require synchronous communication with a member of a care team.
  • Multimedia content sharing for patient education or diagnostic purposes (e.g., images of rashes, audio riles, video files).
  • Sharing care plans based on patient-generated inquiries regarding health questions and conditions.

HR interface and integration.

2

Remote medical devices

  • Remote diagnostic technology for otoscopic, oropharyngeal, and cardiopulmonary examination.
  • Remote blood pressure monitoring.
  • Remote blood glucose monitoring.
  • Continuous glucose monitoring.
  • Remote spirometry.

EHR and population health integration.

FIGURE 20: USE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY FOR ON THE HORIZON ACTIVITIES

The table describes technology strategies that can enhance care delivery by using artificial intelligence and advanced technology tools.


ID

Focus Area

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Innovation

Data Acquisition Dependency

1

Predictive analytics

  • Risk prediction in behavioral health risk, chronic disease risk, and ED utilization risk.
  • AI-enabled care plans with patient-specific instructions.

EHR integration, population health, and patient engagement application integration.

2

Artificial intelligence-enabled diagnostics

Advanced diagnostic tools that can use imaging, audio files, and EHR data to suggest diagnoses and care management plans.

EHR integration and population health integration

RECOMMENDED CITATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Recommended citation: Ansara E, Craig C, Baker L, Morrison E, Burgess K, Deane M, Howard P, Donald F, Rachman F, Esmond W. People with Behavioral Health Conditions Implementation Guide. In: Coleman K, Mital M, editors. Population Health Management Initiative Populations of Focus Implementation Guide Series. 1st ed. Oakland, CA: Kaiser Permanente; 2024.

Acknowledgments: We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the many staff and representatives of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), AllianceChicago, Center for Care Innovations (CCI), JSI Inc and the Center for Excellence in Primary Care at University of California, San Francisco along with Pyramid Communications and Kaiser Permanente’s Population Health Management Initiative (PHMI) team for crafting this work.

In addition, we are grateful for the partnership of the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), Community Health Center partners in PHMI, representatives from the California Primary Care Association and the Regional Associations of California (RAC) along with the many other academic, health plan and consulting partners who shared their expertise and insights freely as we co-designed the initiative and created these guides.

Special thanks to the individual reviewers of this first edition of the Populations of Focus Implementation Guide Series who significantly strengthened this work, including: Jeff Norris, Seema Shah, David Tian, Karen Mark, Palav Babaria (DHCS); Jennifer Sayles (Pop Health Learning Center); Roger Chaufournier, Christine St. Andre (IHI); Kathleen Figoni, Angela Sherwin (CCI).

Endnotes

  1. Saunders H, Mar 17 SMP, 2023. Medicaid Coverage of Behavioral Health Services in 2022: Findings from a Survey of State Medicaid Programs [Internet]. KFF. Available from: https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/medicaid-coverage-of-behavioral-health-services-in-2022-findings-from-a-survey-of-state-medicaid-programs/ 
  2. Exploring Low-Income Californians’ Needs and Preferences for Behavioral Health Care [Internet]. Blue Shield of California Foundation. 2015. Available from: https://blueshieldcafoundation.org/publications/exploring-low-income-californians-needs-and-preferences-for-behavioral-health-care 
  3. Coffman J, Bates T, Geyn I, Spetz J. California’s Current and Future Behavioral Health Workforce [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://healthforce.ucsf.edu/sites/healthforce.ucsf.edu/files/publication-pdf/California%E2%80%99s%20Current%20and%20Future%20Behavioral%20Health%20Workforce.pdf 
  4. Mental Health in California Waiting for Care [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.chcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MentalHealthAlmanac2022.pdf  
  5. American Psychological Association. Data tool: Demographics of the U.S. psychology workforce [Internet]. Apa.org. 2021. Available from: https://www.apa.org/workforce/data-tools/demographics 
  6. Babayan M, Coordinator O. SURVEY: A Snapshot of the “Typical” California MFT [Internet]. Available from: https://www.camft.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Demographic-surveys/2015_demographic_survey.pdf?ver=2019-06-23-164118-007 
  7. American Psychological Association. Data tool: Demographics of the U.S. psychology workforce [Internet]. Apa.org. 2021. Available from: https://www.apa.org/workforce/data-tools/demographics 
  8. Hodgkinson S, Godoy L, Beers LS, Lewin A. Improving Mental Health Access for Low-Income Children and Families in the Primary Care Setting. Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1):e20151175. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1175. Epub 2016 Dec 12. PMID: 27965378; PMCID: PMC5192088. 
  9. Fraser MW, Lombardi BM, Wu S, de Saxe Zerden L, Richman EL, Fraher EP. Integrated Primary Care and Social Work: A systematic review. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2018 Jun 1;9(2):175–215. doi:10.1086/697567 
  10. Martinez LS, Lundgren L, Walter AW, Sousa J, Tahoun N, Steketee G, et al. Behavioral Health, Primary Care Integration, and Social Work’s role in improving health outcomes in communities of color: A systematic review. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2019 Sept 1;10(3):441–57. doi:10.1086/704070  
  11. Health equity and Behavioral Health Integration [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 26]. Available from: https://integrationacademy.ahrq.gov/products/topic-briefs/health-equity  
  12. National Institute of Mental Health. Major Depression [Internet]. National Institute of Mental Health. 2023. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression 
  13. Jia H. National and State Trends in Anxiety and Depression Severity Scores Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report [Internet]. 2021;70(40). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7040e3.htm 
  14. Garcia ME, Hinton L, Neuhaus J, Feldman M, Livaudais-Toman J, Karliner LS. Equitability of Depression Screening After Implementation of General Adult Screening in Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227658. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27658. PMID: 35980633; PMCID: PMC9389351.  
  15. Tran LD, Ponce NA. Who Gets Needed Mental Health Care? Use of Mental Health Services among Adults with Mental Health Need in California. Calif J Health Promot. 2017;15(1):36-45. PMID: 28729814; PMCID: PMC5515380  
  16. Bussing R, Gary FA. Eliminating mental health disparities by 2020: Everyone’s actions matter. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;51(7):663–6. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.04.005  
  17. Philpot LM, Khokhar BA, DeZutter MA, Loftus CG, Stehr HI, Ramar P, Madson LP, Ebbert JO. Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep 24;3(4):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.07.004. PMID: 31993565; PMCID: PMC6978601. 
  18. Population Health Guide for undertaking a three-part data review [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/publications/population-health-guide-undertaking-three-part-data-review 
  19. APA PsycNet [Internet]. psycnet.apa.org. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-59132-000  
  20. Saunders H, Mar 17 SMP, 2023. Medicaid Coverage of Behavioral Health Services in 2022: Findings from a Survey of State Medicaid Programs [Internet]. KFF. Available from: https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/medicaid-coverage-of-behavioral-health-services-in-2022-findings-from-a-survey-of-state-medicaid-programs/  
  21. APA PsycNet [Internet]. psycnet.apa.org. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-59132-000  
  22. Saunders H, Mar 17 SMP, 2023. Medicaid Coverage of Behavioral Health Services in 2022: Findings from a Survey of State Medicaid Programs [Internet]. KFF. Available from: https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/medicaid-coverage-of-behavioral-health-services-in-2022-findings-from-a-survey-of-state-medicaid-programs/ 
  23. Faust D, Zlotnick C. Another dodo bird verdict? revisiting the comparative effectiveness of professional and paraprofessional therapists. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 1995 Oct;2(3):157–67. 
  24. Street RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: An ecological perspective. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2012 Apr;12(2):167–80. doi:10.1586/erp.12.3  
  25. Akincigil, A., Olfson, M., Siegel, M., Zurlo, K. A., Walkup, J. T., & Crystal, S. (2012). Racial and ethnic disparities in depression care in community-dwelling elderly in the United States. American journal of public health, 102(2), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300349 
  26. National Institute of Mental Health. Major Depression [Internet]. National Institute of Mental Health. 2023. Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression  
  27. Jahan N, Went TR, Sultan W, Sapkota A, Khurshid H, Qureshi IA, et al. Untreated depression during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review. Cureus [Internet]. 2021 Aug 17;13(8). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8448270/ 
  28. Enslow, M. R., Galfalvy, H. C., Sajid, S., Pember, R. S., Mann, J. J., & Grunebaum, M. F. (2023). Racial and ethnic disparities in time to first antidepressant medication or psychotherapy. Psychiatry research, 326, 115324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115324 
  29. Simpson, S. M., Krishnan, L. L., Kunik, M. E., & Ruiz, P. (2007). Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment of depression: a literature review. The Psychiatric quarterly, 78(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-006-9022-y 
  30. Garcia ME, Hinton L, Neuhaus J, Feldman M, Livaudais-Toman J, Karliner LS. Equitability of Depression Screening After Implementation of General Adult Screening in Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2227658. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27658 
  31. Califf, R. M., Wong, C., Doraiswamy, P. M., Hong, D. S., Miller, D. P., Mega, J. L., & Baseline Study Group (2022). Importance of Social Determinants in Screening for Depression. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(11), 2736–2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06957-5 
  32. Chavez, L. J., Tyson, D. P., Davenport, M. A., Kelleher, K. J., & Chisolm, D. J. (2023). Social Needs as a Risk Factor for Positive Postpartum Depression Screens in Pediatric Primary Care. Academic pediatrics, S1876-2859(23)00095-5. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2023.03.007 
  33. Ahmedani BK, Simon GE, Stewart C, Beck A, Waitzfelder BE, Rossom R, et al. Health Care Contacts in the Year Before Suicide Death. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014 Feb 25;29(6):870–7. 
  34. Preventing Suicide Requires a Comprehensive Approach [Internet]. cdc.gov. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/pdf/2023_CDC_SuicidePrevention_Infographic.pdf  
  35. Preventing Suicide Requires a Comprehensive Approach [Internet]. cdc.gov. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/pdf/2023_CDC_SuicidePrevention_Infographic.pdf  
  36. Bandelow, B., & Michaelis, S. (2015). Epidemiology of anxiety disorders in the 21st century. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 17(3), 327–335.  
  37. Samander, L. J., & Harman, J. (2022). Disparities in Offered Anxiety Treatments Among Minorities. Journal of primary care & community health, 13, 21501319211065807.  
  38. Thomeer, M. B., Moody, M. D., & Yahirun, J. (2023). Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mental Health and Mental Health Care During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 10(2), 961–976.  
  39. McLean, C. P., Asnaani, A., Litz, B. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2011). Gender differences in anxiety disorders: prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness. Journal of psychiatric research, 45(8), 1027–1035. 
  40. Allen, J., Balfour, R., Bell, R., & Marmot, M. (2014). Social determinants of mental health. International review of psychiatry, 26(4), 392–407.  
  41. O’Connor E, Henninger M, Perdue LA, Coppola EL, Thomas R, Gaynes BN. Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Adults: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 223. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. AHRQ publication 22-05295-EF-1. 
  42. Coles, S., & Vosooney, A. (2021). Evidence lacking to support universal unhealthy drug use screening. American Family Physician, 103(2), 72–73. 
  43. Roberts, S. C., & Nuru-Jeter, A. (2012). Universal screening for alcohol and drug use and racial disparities in child protective services reporting. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 39(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-011-9247-x 
  44. Manuel, J. K., Satre, D. D., Tsoh, J., Moreno-John, G., Ramos, J. S., McCance-Katz, E. F., & Satterfield, J. M. (2015). Adapting Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Alcohol and Drugs to Culturally Diverse Clinical Populations. Journal of addiction medicine, 9(5), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000150 
  45. Young, M.M., Stevens, A., Galipeau, J. et al. Effectiveness of brief interventions as part of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) model for reducing the nonmedical use of psychoactive substances: a systematic review. Syst Rev 3, 50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-50 
  46. Alegría, M., NeMoyer, A., Falgàs Bagué, I., Wang, Y., & Alvarez, K. (2018). Social Determinants of Mental Health: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Current psychiatry reports, 20(11), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0969-9 
  47. Ruiz Escobar E, Pathak S, Blanchard CM. Screening and Referral Care Delivery Services and Unmet Health-Related Social Needs: A Systematic Review. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2021 Aug 12;18. 
  48. Chavez, L. J., Tyson, D. P., Davenport, M. A., Kelleher, K. J., & Chisolm, D. J. (2023). Social Needs as a Risk Factor for Positive Postpartum Depression Screens in Pediatric Primary Care. Academic pediatrics, S1876-2859(23)00095-5. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2023.03.007 
  49. Ruiz Escobar E, Pathak S, Blanchard CM. Screening and Referral Care Delivery Services and Unmet Health-Related Social Needs: A Systematic Review. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2021 Aug 12;18. 
  50. Califf, R. M., Wong, C., Doraiswamy, P. M., Hong, D. S., Miller, D. P., Mega, J. L., & Baseline Study Group (2022). Importance of Social Determinants in Screening for Depression. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(11), 2736–2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06957-5 
  51. Corrigan PW, Morris SB, Michaels PJ, Rafacz JD, Rüsch N. Challenging the Public Stigma of Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Studies. Psychiatric services (Washington, DC) 2012;63(10):963–73. 10.1176/appi.ps.201100529. 
  52. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Academy of Medicine; Committee on the Future of Nursing 2020–2030; Flaubert JL, Le Menestrel S, Williams DR, et al., editors. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2021 May 11. 2, Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573923/ 
  53. Butler, AB ED, Morgan, MD, MSc, MSHP AU, Kangovi, MD, MS S. Screening for Unmet Social Needs: Patient Engagement or Alienation? NEJM Catalyst [Internet]. 2020 Jul 20; Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.19.1037  
  54. Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center. Screening and Interventions for Social Risk Factors: A Technical Brief to Support the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/inline-files/Social%20Risk%20Factors%20Tech%20Brief_Assembled%20for%20Web_Sep%202021_1.pdf 
  55. Rojas L, Project S. Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model Evaluation Second Evaluation Report RTI Point of Contact [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 16]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/data-and-reports/2023/ahc-second-eval-rpt 
  56. Sınger A, Coleman K, Mahmud A, Holden E, Stefanik-Guizlo K. Assessing the Feasibility of an Empathic Inquiry Approach to Social Needs Screening in 10 Federally Qualified Health Centers. The Permanente Journal. 2023 Dec 15;27(4):136–42. 
  57. Byhoff E, Gottlieb LM. When There Is Value in Asking: An Argument for Social Risk Screening in Clinical Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(8):1181-1182. doi:10.7326/M22-0147 
  58. American College of Physicians. Closing-the-Loop. Baltimore: Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative--CMS; 2015. 
  59. Simpson, S. M., Krishnan, L. L., Kunik, M. E., & Ruiz, P. (2007). Racial disparities in diagnosis and treatment of depression: a literature review. The Psychiatric quarterly, 78(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-006-9022-y  
  60. Enslow, M. R., Galfalvy, H. C., Sajid, S., Pember, R. S., Mann, J. J., & Grunebaum, M. F. (2023). Racial and ethnic disparities in time to first antidepressant medication or psychotherapy. Psychiatry research, 326, 115324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115324 
  61. Garcia JL. Historical trauma and American Indian/Alaska Native youth mental health development and delinquency. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2020;2020(169):41-58. 
  62. Viswanathan M, Wallace I, Middleton JC, et al. Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 221. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. AHRQ publication No. 22-05293-EF-1. 
  63. Koball, A. M., Rasmussen, C., Olson-Dorff, D., Klevan, J., Ramirez, L., & Domoff, S. E. (2019). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences, healthcare utilization, cost of care and medical comorbidities. Child abuse & neglect, 90, 120–126. https://doi-org.aurarialibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.01.021 
  64. Institute of Medicine. 2003. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10260  
  65. Improving Health Equity: Build Infrastructure to Support Health Equity. Guidance for Health Care Organizations. Boston, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2019. (Available at www.ihi.org)  
  66. Chadha N, Lim B, Kane M, Rowland B. Institute for Healing and Justice in Medicine; 2020. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/race-medicine 
  67. REaL Data Collection Toolbox [Internet]. KHA; 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 18]. Available from: http://www.khaquality.com/Portals/[4]/Resources/HQIC_REaL%20Data_Collection_Toolbox.pdf  
  68. Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services TIP 57 [Internet]. Available from: https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/sma14-4816.pdf  
  69. Standing Orders | Center for Excellence in Primary Care [Internet]. cepc.ucsf.edu. Available from: https://cepc.ucsf.edu/standing-orders  
  70. Houle, J., Gascon-Depatie, M., Bélanger-Dumontier, G., & Cardinal, C. (2013). Depression self-management support: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.012 
  71. Moerenhout T, Borgermans L, Schol S, Vansintejan J, Van De Vijver E, Devroey D. Patient health information materials in waiting rooms of family physicians: do patients care? Patient preference and adherence [Internet]. 2013 Jun 4;7:489–97. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3678903/  
  72. Self-Management Support | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. www.ahrq.gov. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/self-mgmt/home.html  
  73. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2002. 
  74. Canady VA. California FQHCs see increased audio‐only BH telehealth visits. Mental Health Weekly. 2023 Apr 21;33(16):5–6.  
  75. Bulkes NZ, Davis K, Kay B, Riemann BC. Comparing efficacy of telehealth to in-person mental health care in intensive-treatment-seeking adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2021 Nov;145:347–52.  
  76. Waite MR, Diab S, Adefisoye J. Virtual Behavioral Health Treatment Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Time. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022;9(3):158-165. Published 2022 Jul 18. doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1918 
  77. Smith SG, Pandit A, Rush SR, Wolf MS, Simon CJ. The Role of Patient Activation in Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Results From a National Survey of U.S. Adults. J Health Commun. 2016;21(1):67-75. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1033115. Epub 2015 Aug 27. PMID: 26313690; PMCID: PMC4706032. 
  78. Villas-Boas SB, Kaplan S, White JS, Hsia RY. Adolescent Total and Mental Health–Related Emergency Department Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(10):e2336463. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36463 
  79. Solmi, M., Radua, J., Olivola, M. et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry 27, 281–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7 
  80. Bergen, C., Bortolotti, L., Tallent, K., Broome, M., Larkin, M., Temple, R., Fadashe, C., Lee, C., Lim, M. C., & McCabe, R. (2022). Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters: Introducing the agential stance. Theory & Psychology, 32(5), 667-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221095079 
  81. Fischer, J. A., Kelly, C. M., Kitchener, B. A., & Jorm, A. F. (2013). Development of Guidelines for Adults on How to Communicate With Adolescents About Mental Health Problems and Other Sensitive Topics: A Delphi Study. SAGE Open, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013516769 
  82. Viswanathan M, Wallace I, Middleton JC, et al. Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 221. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. AHRQ publication No. 22-05293-EF-1. 
  83. Bridge JA, Horowitz LM, Fontanella CA, et al. Age-related racial disparity in suicide rates among US youths from 2001 through 2015. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(7):697-699 
  84. Garcia JL. Historical trauma and American Indian/Alaska Native youth mental health development and delinquency. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2020;2020(169):41-58. 
  85. Viswanathan M, Wallace I, Middleton JC, et al. Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 221. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. AHRQ publication No. 22-05293-EF-1.  
  86. Garcia JL. Historical trauma and American Indian/Alaska Native youth mental health development and delinquency. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2020;2020(169):41-58. 
  87. Sullivan, K, George, S. & Horowitz, K. (2021) Addressing National Workforce Shortages by Funding Child Psychiatry Access Programs. Pediatrics January 2021; 147 (1). https://e20194012. 10.1542/peds.2019-4012  
  88. Weiner M, Perkins AJ, Callahan CM. Errors in completion of referrals among older urban adults in ambulatory care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(1):76-81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01117.x 
  89. Mehrotra A, Forrest CB, Lin CY. Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States. Milbank Q. 2011;89(1):39–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x. 
  90. Mehrotra A, Forrest CB, Lin CY. Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States. Milbank Q. 2011;89(1):39–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x. 
  91. Cai C, Gaffney A, McGregor A, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, McCormick D, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in outpatient visit rates across 29 specialties. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1525. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3771  
  92. Neikrug AB, Stehli A, Xiong GL, Suo S, Le-Bucklin KV, Cant W, et al. Train New Trainers Primary Care Psychiatry Fellowship—Optimizing Delivery of Behavioral Health Care Through Training for Primary Care Providers. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2022 Apr 18;Publish Ahead of Print.